[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1760305851581603.jpg (356 KB, 1336x925)
356 KB
356 KB JPG
Why don't any movie franchises retell the same story over and over again like how the Zelda games used to? I don't think kids would ever get bored of them retelling like say, the Spider-Man origin story every couple years but with different actors, aesthetics, tone, gimmicks, etc. If they kept trying to make them better, always using new technology and techniques, the magic would never go away. Yeah I know the reason now is because such a thing would require effort, but why was this never a thing back in the day when movie makers actually cared? I think another good example of something this would work for is jurassic park. Nowadays they're so afraid of doing the same thing as the original that the new movies have literally no aspects of the original story. So why is it still called jurassic park? But just look at jurassic park 1 and world 1. Same story, but kids loved both.
>>
are these zeldda games even good
>>
Bond movies basically do this
>>
>>217239756
Yes
>>
Zelda games kerp having to reinvent the gameplay completely every few years. No one really cares about the story. Over the years they've accumulated enough story for one movie's worth.
>>
>>217239756
They are some of the best games in the adventure genre ever made. One of the puzzles in Breath of the Wild was triangulating the positions photos on a smart phone were taken from.
>>
>>217239756
Ocarina of Time probably wont impress anyone who plays modern games, but a lot of shit in it was new at the time. It's still a good game though. Never played Breath of the Wild or whatever the fuck.
If you mean like all of them, and not just the ones in the OP, a lot of them are. I don't feel like going over it.
>>
but that's exactly what you've described in your very example. they make a new spider man movie every couple years and there are a dozen TV shows which always have some new twist. Spectacular is the best btw.
>>
>>217239756
Yep. I've been playing them since before I could ride a bike and I still love them to this day. Though pic related was kind of a bad example because they did change the legend in 2017 which is the game the blue one is from, and they will probably keep retelling it that way for quite a while. But the point is growing up every game was basically just a remake of Ocarina of Time and I never got bored. In fact Zelda was by far the most exciting series.
>>217239757
I did not know that. I suppose I'll give them a try.
>>
>>217239784
Bullshit. Every game after Zelda 2 but before Breath of the Wild was always either just Link to the Past or Ocarina. And Ocarina was just Link to the Past in 3D. They never reinvented shit for decades. They only added slight gimmicks like giving you a boat instead of a horse or letting you turn into a wolf. And in those sections it still played the exact same way.
>>
>>217239927
No. I've played so many early Zelda games. Minish Cap is very different to LttP. Link Between the Worlds is a sequel of sorts to LttP and is actually similar to it. The DS games are their own grouping and feel alike, btw these are the worst main Zelda game. The GameBoy ones feel different too since the screen is constricted, they're their own grouping with 3 in total and are actually more fun than the DS ones, especially Link's Awakening which got remade without the small screen sharding.
>>
>>217239825
They literally only retold his story one time in the movies. Or two if you count the Miles one which I don't because the themes were quite different. Spiderverse 1 was missing the essential part of his selfishness causing the death of his uncle. In spiderverse his uncle died because he was trying to be a hero but wasn't strong enough yet, which completely destroys the whole point of the story. I know they tried to do some bullshit by saying "ermm ackshually Miles WAS selfish because he didn't want to take advantage of the opportunities he was given by his elite prep school in order to prove that blacks can be smart and successful too and everytime someone is racist from now on it's his fault for not acting like coach carter" but first of all that's retarded, and second of all they never ever show any repercussions for his actions. I guess they did show what could have happened to him if he kept on the path he was on by killing Aaron but at this point it's just a different fucking story. It wasn't Miles's fault Aaron died in any way, and idk why they try to act like it was. The writers were too pussy to let their new urban mary sue spider-man actually do anything wrong and they thought they could just have the characters say he did and it would be the same story somehow. It's bullshit.

As for the shows I have never seen them. I just assumed they skipped the origin and did their own thing like the Tom Holland movies.
>>
Kevin Spacey is...Bombing the Dodongos.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.