[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: ape33.png (3.97 MB, 2200x1178)
3.97 MB
3.97 MB PNG
soul vs soulless
>>
I always liked the tim burton planet of the apes movie, I was looking forward to the sequel we never got, I could never understand why people hated, and yes I love the original 1960s movie too, I hate the new cgi stuff though, the new cgi apes look so fake
>>
>>217263505
It looks more real but the CGI one can do more fighting and looks better fighting.
>>
>>217264012
>it's le fight scenes that make a movie good
I swear this board is made up of literal retards. The lack of movement in older movies meant more actual meaningful scenes. It's the new hope light saber fight vs 10 minutes of jumping around faggot slop.
>>
>>217264241
You have a point on that but you can't make a action blockbuster today and having some little fight in your movie. It has to be spectacular.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.