>He was already sad in person...why did they need photographic evidence of it?>Did he have this photograph for some other motive prior to the bike theft or was it taken in the brief time between the theft and then>this would include going to the film store, waiting for it to develop along with the other countless shenanigans you need for the meeting later with the 217 pieces of information, evidence and the mandatory invites to everyone in townif I could ask Paul Reubens one last question, it would be about this evidence!
>>217264227If I could tell Paul Rubens one thing it would be that his "friends" outed him after he died
He did nothing wrong, it's like getting in trouble for getting wet at a pool party. Total smear job! But why?
It's called double jeopardy. Basically you need two pieces of evidence for every allegation.
>>217264249Gays' excuse is he was a public figure, + dead ppl don't have privacy about their identity which isn't private life.
>>217264249It's pretty clear he worked with other gays. Like the guy who directed Twin Sitters
>>217264249He outed himself in the documentary.
>>217264227Everybody wanted his bike.
