Hollywood is so cooked. How will primitive art ever compete with the digital gods that are AI prompt engineers?
>>217268180Hollywood just hires the prompt engineers, retard. Hollywood doesn't hate AI, randos on Twitter do, and you are too retarded to tell the difference. Adrian Brody won an Oscar for a performance that was modified by AI.
>>217268180>How will white people compete with Indians By cutting off H1B visas
>>217268180saar, do the needful please open penAIs basterd bitch
>>217268180Go back to /a/
>>217268180Is this Epstein as Yubaba?
Release the Ghibli files.
>>217268180damn, John Cena looks like that??
>Hollywood is so cooked. How will primitive art ever compete with the digital gods that are AI prompt engineers?
>>217268242Then the jobs simply get outsourced to India
>>217268180looks like an old john cena >>217268340kek
>>217268340unrealistic, he's not propelled by a jetstream of shit.
>>217268384That's what tariffs are for.
AND HIS NAME IS JOHN ANIME!!!!
>>217268180HOLLYWOOD? MORE LIKE SMELLYWOOD
>>217268530>implying Tariffs have worked
i fucking hate those stupid miazaki faces and monsters, evrytiem i see them i want to punch my monitor
>>217268643If they don't work then why does China, Europe, and the rest of the world use them?
>>217270637Because the U.S. is a net importer of goods and thus the only person that benefits from tariffs are American companies, not consumers.
>>217268817I'm pretty sure only children should be bothered by the grotesque characters in fucking spirited away lmao
>>217270708I wasn't talking about the US, I'm talking about everyone else. Why use them?
i'm gonna proompt
but why john cena?
>>217270708The American worker benefits by an increase in the aggregate demand for domestic labor and this benefit exceeds the increased cost of goodsFree flow of goods and labor is a Koch brothers policy and has led to the destruction of the American union, and workers bargaining - economically and socially, the supply side of domestic labor benefits from tariffs
>>217271134Sounds like communism. Commies get thrown into the woodchipper
>>217268180That looks like shit, anon.
>>217271134Tariffs do not raise aggregate demand for domestic labor in net terms. They reshuffle demand within the economy while shrinking it overall. Higher input costs hit downstream industries, reduce output, suppress investment, and kill jobs that vastly outnumber the protected ones. You’re trading a small, visible group of protected workers for a larger, invisible group of laid-off or never-hired workers. Tariffs are a regressive tax. Workers pay more for food, cars, clothes, housing materials, everything. Real wages fall. Any wage “gain” in protected sectors is swamped by higher living costs and job losses elsewhere. A worker with a slightly higher nominal wage but higher rent, higher grocery bills, and fewer job options is not better off.Tariffs strengthen employers, not workers. By reducing competition, tariffs increase pricing power for domestic firms. That weakens worker leverage. Employers with captive markets have less incentive to share gains and more room to suppress wages. Worker bargaining improves when labor markets are tight and competitive, not when firms are insulated.
>>217268180
>>217268340toilet witch, run saars!!
>>217268180Why are jeets so tacky?
Bros.... how....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5QM4w1U5DU
>>217268213Hungarian editor used his own pronunciation to correct 1 sound. The rest of the character's soul + personality are the actors creation. A bland narcissistic regime puppet 's shills won't get it.
>>217271324Yeah definitely has nothing to do with the fact Indians are smelly subhumans. Nice try Sandeep.
>>217268180Is that Epstein as the witch?
>>217271369Correct, incel, it has nothing to do with that.Learn to code.
>>217271206>aggregate >netDrop the Perdue talking points and look at what you’re saying. Your hypothetical workers which are laid off or never hired already occur and at an even greater rate due to the offshoring of labor. Labor, when maximizing value, flows to the locations with least workers rights and lowest wages. The consumer would experience the lowest possible prices if every industry was exported to Chinese factories and Indian tech companies and that’s exactly what’s happened, to the detriment of American workers and to the profit of stockholders. In your last paragraph you try to equate domestic industry with monopolistic industry. It is only in domestic industry where the state, and the citizens acting through the state, are able to legislate solutions to ‘insulated’ local markets. If your goal is maximize market efficiency, open borders and a race to the bottom in terms of working conditions is also optimal.
>>217271458You’re blaming trade for failures of domestic governance and asking workers to pay higher prices to cover for it.First: offshoring ≠ tariffs fixing labor markets. Offshoring happened because capital is mobile and labor law is weak, not because trade exists. Tariffs don’t stop capital from chasing low wages; they just raise prices at home while firms automate, consolidate, or offshore anyway. If tariffs actually restored labor demand, we’d see durable wage growth in protected sectors. We don’t. We see temporary protection followed by layoffs, mergers, and rent extraction.Second: “those workers were already laid off” is not a rebuttal. It’s an admission that tariffs don’t solve the problem you’re complaining about. You’re not reversing offshoring—you’re taxing the entire working class to subsidize a narrow slice of firms that already have every incentive to suppress wages.Third: domestic industry is not magically accountable to the state. That’s fantasy. US history is full of tariff-protected industries crushing unions, colluding on prices, and capturing regulators. Protection increases firm power first; labor only benefits if strong labor law forces redistribution. Without that, “insulation” just means higher margins and weaker worker leverage.
>>217268180The bottom one looks like an old John Cena
>>217270637It works for certain products/commodities depending on their supply and demand and when used strategically Using it willy nilly doesnt do jack shit and pretty much ends up backfiring
>>217271543> First: offshoring ≠ tariffs fixing labor markets. Offshoring happened because capital is mobile and labor law is weak, not because trade exists. Already addressed. International labor law doesn’t exist and labor laws are domestic policies. I never claim that capital isn’t mobile and the tariff policy is based on the assumption that it is. >1b. while firms automateHigher labor costs incentivize automation but the discussion of speculative technological developments is beyond the scope of your other claims. > Second: “those workers were already laid off” is not a rebuttal. It’s an admission that tariffs don’t solve the problem you’re complaining about. They were laid off following the Uni-party’s commitment to free trade. Clinton was the end of any Labour Party in the US and the GOP was already committed to its ‘free trade leads to freer people’ strategy of foreign affairs, although this was often largely just cover for the real profit incentive. The workers were already laid off as a result of free trade policies and is evidence of the negative impact of free trade on domestic labor. We can find an equilibrium with global labor but the average global wage is roughly 1,083$ a month. As long as minimum wage laws exist, and you don’t want to experience a significant decline in living standards, protectionist policies remain in the favor of American labor. > Third: domestic industry is not magically accountable to the state. That’s fantasy. That’s the law, and I focus on domestic policy because domestic laws are the only enforceable ones. If you’d like to claim that domestic firms can operate outside of the authority of the state, I’d say you’ve identified illicit organizations. Using terms like ‘magically’ to try to minimize the statement is a sign that your actual rebuttal is very weak.
>>217271436
>>217272172>words words wordsthe right can't meme
>>217272201You're even more retarded than I thought, impressive.
>>217271324>smells bettercome on
>>217268180love me human-made art. simple as.
>>217268643>>217270708>>217271963Reminder, US tariffs were originally there to fund the government. The goal of them was to limit government spending.>>217268384Good, Bollywood needs to up their global game.
>>217268301Is that Tommy Lee Jones? lol
>>217272172Possible with the word jeet
>>217271324>smells better>doesn't harass womenlol lmao even
>>217268643They did, pedocrat in denial
>>217270708We're a net importer because we're losing our jobs.
>>217268180They have you guys shouting about Indians while they take your jobs away with their AI.
>>217268180AI made her a man. Stunning and brave.
