Why didn’t Kate Upton have a bigger acting career?She’s basically just an oversized Sydney Sweeney
She was a model, not an actress.
>>217315490I think you answered your own question
>>217315490She's not attractive and she doesn't know how to act
>>217315490Sydney can act and has a hot body. Upton is genuinely just a pair of tits.
>>217315490Fridge body outside of her tits.
she waited too long, clearly had a shitty agent and she can't act. anna nicole smith tier.
The Layover was enjoyable, but it took a collective dozen cup sizes from the female leads to make that work
>>217315490She can't act at all and she's more popular for being a hot piece of ass. Plus she had enough capital to not have to fuck jew producers(Male or Female)to get fame and money.
She was never all that great looks-wise.
>>217315527that never stopped [insert actress here]
>>217315490she literally has no ass
>>217315490She should've been a bond girl, but because bond went woke when she came up, they never casted her.That said, she married a famous baseball player and pumped out some babies with him and just stays home while he makes millions. Can't blame her.
>>217315689This.Boobs are great but a man needs a place to rest his tongue
>>217315490Because she couldn't act. There is a minimum requirement.
>>217315535I'll defend Sweeney's popularity to my dying breath and the necessity of her career in shaping Hollywood.But she absolutely cannot act.
>>217315689No curves either. Did you see her in a bikini in the Three Stooges?
>>217315527>she doesn't know how to actAs if that matters
>>217315490She didnt pay shills on internet
>>217315696The Victoria Beckham route I guess LOL.
>>217315696>l, but because bond went woke when she came upCraig had one of the most beautiful set of Bond girls of ANY of the Bonds. Eva Green, Olga Kurylenko, Lea Seydoux, Ana de Armas, Monica Bellucci and Gemma Arterton, plus smaller roles with Ivana Milicevic, Caterina Murino, Berenice Marlohe (all models, so your claim that Kate Upton wasn't a Bond girl because she was a model makes no sense).
>>217315882It does. You have no idea what actual non-acting looks like. There's a minimum ability required and she didn't have it.
She was always very overrated, if she didn't have big tits no one would have looked at her twice. There's a reason all her big modelling shoots were very curated and edited to disguise her non-existent hips that made her look like a barrel.
>>217315995All true.But, she DOES have huge tits, so at least there’s that
>>217315995Ugly bong teeth
>>217315949She starred in several movies. How did she get those parts if she didn't have the ability to act?
>>217315943Eva Green was ok, but the rest, meh.
>>217316106What movies are those?
>>217316126Fuck off, retard.
>>217316133They're named in this thread. Don't play dumb.
>>217316106So did Ronda Rousey. When you're a big name, they will try to put you in films. But if you can't act for shit and have zero screen presence, it's not going to continue. Arnie wasn't a good "actor" but he was very charismatic on-screen, decent comic timing and he worked with a lot of good directors, not just junk roles.
>>217316060always had a fridge bod. she's like the proto sweeney but i think sweeney cleans up better. both can't act.
>>217315490Upton actually makes Margot Robbie look shapely. Kate is the fridge of fridges. Sweeney has a decent body outside of her boobs, her legs are great, ass is ok, her hips are her weak spot too but not Upton or Robbie tier.
>>217315490Sydney gets nude in her roles. Hell her best nude scene had was one where the director wasn't going to her have nude, but she demanded it.Whereas good luck finding nudes of Upton outside of leaks.
>>217316169Wow, quite the resume, she must have been real dynamite on-screen.
>>217316188Hollywood is in no way shape or form a meritocracy.
>>217316197Sweeney isn't a fridge and she's an actress first, Upton was a supermodel first and foremost.
>>217315771Why are scat fetishists so prevelant today?
>>217315490This, but Brooklyn Decker?
>>217316245>todayyou can also eat ass without scat play
>>217316230>You won't get cast if you can't act!>*Gets cast in 6 films*>Well, um... you see, they were just testing her acting skills
>>217315490she's a wierd looking brit bimbo that can't act.
>>217315689
>>217316239I didn't say it was. In fact I said they will try to put you in movies if you're a big name, even if it's just for modelling or whatever, but if you just absolutely suck, then you're just a drain on the film unless it's the most unchallenging rom com pap, which is very limiting, and negates your perceived value. They can't draw blood from a stone.
>>217315490this bitches nudes are dismal
>>217316280Brother, 6 movies in over than 10 years is pitiful for a filmography. Not like they were huge roles
>>217316280>a comedy, two rom coms, and a film without a wikipedia articlewow
>>217316294>britShe's from Michigan, her uncle was a congressman.
>>217316295Millie is very bottom heavy, I wouldn't say she's the norm as far as hips go. She's not Dafne Keen levels but they are pretty wide. Sweeney is also very slim in that picture, she's been heavier than that including in roles.
>>217316280That she ONLY appeared in a couple of junk films over the course of 13 years says it all, she was a really big name for a while, all over magazines and adverts as a supermodel, they used to do that mobile game ad campaign that was just sold on her showing loads of cleavage. Cara Delevingne appeared in far more high profile films and shows during her media push and she's crap at acting.
>>217316464>Cara Delevingne appeared in far more high profile films and shows during her media push and she's crap at actingThat's my point. Skill does not matter. Her ability to act has nothing to do with her lack of roles. She married a super rich athlete and probably didn't want to do sexual favors for disgusting hollywood producers. If she did, she would have had more movie roles.
>>217316766>That's my point. Skill does not matter.It does, because Cara faded from those big roles very quickly despite her huge media push, she became a drain on films and producers will not cast you if they think you're going to hurt their project's chances of success. You don't have to be the greatest in the world, but a minimum amount of acting ability or at least screen presence is needed. Name value alone will only carry you so far.
>>217316272She was great for a minute, but then her tits sort of deflated and disappeared.But even at her biggest, she was still smaller than Upton
>>217315490Real answer: She threw it all away to be a mom and wife and now lives happily with two kids and husband. Sweeney said she wanted to be a young mom but hasn't stopped making movies and dumped her long-time bf.
>>217315490Terrible movies can be made enjoyable with the addition of giant boobs.They really had it figured out in the 80’s
>>217315535>Sydney can actAbsolutely not. She was immersion-ruining terrible in Housemaid.
>>217316878>Hank Hill ass.
>>217315689idc that its flat as a board, get me within tonguing distance and that ass will be Ate Upton
>>217315689lmao what a sad dumpy ass
>>217315490>alright tits>mid face>fridge bodyA look that could have only survived in the mid to late 2000s. At least 90s babes were skinny to compensate for their lack of curves.
>>217316916>She threw it all awayShe made the right move.
I miss when the sex comedy flavours of the month were Amazonian Scandinavians
>>217316126lol, get the fuck outta here
