That one ruined castle in "the Ring Goes South" sequence always ruins my immersion with its bad CGI
>>217322047Assume I am a pleb and have a very bad eye for errors in film. What is the problem here?
>>217322178the hd footage should make it clearerhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PreffqwJQlcat 15 seconds in
Guess it's two seconds of screentime didn't warrant building a full miniature. But still it looks bad!
>>217322047same, but for me it's Gollum
>>217322462Sorry, no, it doesn't.
>>217322462>>217322554I think part of it is the composite. The edge on everything looks feathered and cuts into the silhouette too much on the bordersOther than that the textures look kind of like when you turn texture filtering down to its lowest setting in a game so something to do with texture filtering I guess, the stonework looks a bit blurry. And I think the lighting is not harsh enough for broad daylight.
Imagine the possibilities of 3D printed models with added details by hand. Combining the best of both world.
>>217322687Have sex
>>217322047The lighting of the beacons sequence is way worse
>>217322047>2001 btw with 90's techStill shits on most stuff today
>>217322047What until you get to Return of the King, where everything looks fake and or like a video game.
