Was it woke?
You like black girls?
>>217333245I love them.
>>217333239>Hey Crabman!
>>217333239Is woke anti-White (((goyslop)))?
>>217333239Absolutely wild that such a shit movie came from the same guy that made amazing films semi-recently like There Will Be Blood and The Master, even Phantom Thread feels like a much more respectable and smart film than this despite being boring.This movie was so fucking dumb and cheesy compared to everything else PTA has made. Feels like a legit sell-out type move.Need to rewatch There Will Be Blood to get the taste of it out of my mouth.
>>217333239Yes (and that's good, actually)
>>217333245I like Filipino women.
It's satire. My names Jungle Pussy.
It's antisemitic. The "Christmas Adventure Club" is a direct reference to Epstein's network and secret Jewish groups holding power and control.
I am not at all a /pol/ incel and I really wanted to like this but something about it still felt wrong to me. People claim its a "both sides" movie but the fact that hardcore woke journalists circlejerk over it should tell you that's bullshit.
its in that disco elysium zone where it agrees with woke but portrays them as so pathetic that you can interpret it as an insult
>>217334148It's a no sides movie.
>>217334150>It agrees with woke What does that even mean?
It seeks to impress upon its audience the idea that there's shadowy cabals of white supremacists scattered across the US. So yes.
Most Ebinlauta thread right now
>>217333239Why can't PTA make people watch his movie?
>>217334161I really don't think so. It portrays the right wing as evil facist racists (which is true) but its only criticism of the left is basically that they're cringe and annoying. It almost had something but it felt like they were too pussy to go all the way with it. Eddington was unironically a better satire on the same subject and that's proven by it pissing everyone off.
>>2173341982kino
>>217334161Disingenuous. It's significantly more negative about some demographics than others. Unsurprisingly, one demo in particular doesn't feature at all - despite common attributes of this demographic being crudely assigned to another.
>>217334221This is pretty commonLike a lot of things written by left-wing idealogues that wish to present as being "unbiased" tend to do this, they absolutely pull their punches when "criticising" their side and go all-out on the opposing side, but act as if it is equal.Disco Elysium really is a perfect example, as >>217334150 saysThe criticism of left-wing is always "oh well yeah I guess they're a bit pushy or cringy but still sincere and honest and trying to change things" whereas the right-wing depiction is always "yup absolutely evil without exception". I'm no genius but to me those two things don't seem equal in fucking slightest.
>>217334221>it portrays the right wing It portrays Lockjaw as a corrupt Colonel using his power to try to hide a secret. I hate you people projecting whole values onto characters in art.
>>217334275like trump covering up a beautiful secret huh
>>217334221>but its only criticism of the left is basically that they're cringe and annoyingIt literally shows the French 75 to be terrorists.
>>217334181I hate these white supremacists. Inviting only their white supremacist friends into business. Giving their white supremacist friends 0% loans at the bank. Systemically occupying more and more positions of power and white supremacist influence. Buying media and news outlets to spread white supremacist propaganda. Creating laws to prevent people from boycotting white supremacist products and companies. Creating more laws and a special word to stop white supremacist hate. Lobbying government for white supremacist interests and sending taxpayer money back home to white supremacist land. There's a real problem here and OBAA tackles it head on.
>>217334251you're the kind of person that would get filtered by Starship Troopers
>>217334112lol troll
>>217334224stfu
>>217334345How so?Starship Troopers is a funny example of the filmmakers intending it to portray one side poorly (e.g., "fascist" militaristic right-wingers) and yet it unintentionally portrayed them in a way that most people liked and agreed with, which is hilarious.What did you intend by this comparison?I guarantee I am more intelligent than you but I am willing to hear out your explanation on this.
>>217333260Hey Earl
>>217334324terrorists who are ultimately still the good guys and get a happy ending?
>>217334405Who got a happy ending besides Bob?
>>217334371Oh wow you're legitimately broken minded.
>>217334405>the good guysThey're the protagonists. I don't think there's any suggestion that they're good.
