>kills cinema forever
>>217339719is this the most pretensious genre?
>>217339758>american educationIt's not a genre
what did it change
>>217339787a movment?
godard is a pretentious twatbresson is a pretentious twat
>>217339989Truffaut was worse than both, all he did was poorly ripoff Catcher in the Rye
>>217339830different way of making films, broadly speakingits filmmakers had different styles though, some of them were heavy on modernist and postmodernist storytelling, others on visual and cinematographical style, montage, departing from the studio system, etc.They were inspired by some American filmmakers and Italian ones (the Neorealismo of the 40s and 50s) and influenced subsequent 'New waves' (in Britain, Japan, Czechoslovakia, and so on)>>217339831yes>>217339989different kinds of 'pretentiousness' though, and bresson predated the movement
>>217339719we need a 100 year ban on french cinema
>>217340210lel
>>217340196so hum am I wrong saying it's a prentetious movement or it really is?
>>217339719ITT pleb scum
>>217340359it was a creative movement, it had its meritssome of their works were 'pretentious' (I dislike using this adjective tbqh) but they were a vanguard for cinema
>>217340074the sequels are much better
>>217340654ok thanks
>>217340626and what do you have to say?
>>217339989Bresson is genuinely great, despite his retarded egotistical take on actors, but he wasn't from the new wave
>>217339989Bresson isn't new wave retard
>>217339989moron
For me it's Melville.
>>217339719It was rich kids dicking around
>>217339719meanwhile, in Japan
>>217341673>>217342165ya mudda
>>217342522no wonder why Delon is flirting with a nigger in le samourai
>>217339719There is only so much you can do with any medium. They just happened to be in the right place at the right time.
the lesson: rather than try to reinvent the wheel, invent new media
>>217343410James Cameron tried with those stupid 3D glasses for the first Avatar. They already had 3D glasses in the 50s...
