Are you excited for a fresh take on this classic?
>>217349652I'm sure it will meticulously avoid any even subtle fetish content. Not sure why considering you see giantess and even vore in music videos.
>>217349674I pray to god they don't satiate vorefags. I do find it hard to believe that a video like this wasn't explicitly designed to arouse.https://youtu.be/qolmz4FlnZ0?si=qmvwcirplHZOIV8M
every version of this movie has been bad
>>217349652We're in good hands boys.
>>217350156incorrect
>>217349652Are they casting Sydney Sweeney?
>>217349652>going to turn this into some stupid feminist slop instead of giantess kinoDropped
>>217350156I quite like the original
>>217349652>best poster of all time>actual movie is complete dogshit
50 ft is too small. That's nothing. The chick in the OG poster is more like 150 ft. Modern audiences demand bigger.