What do you look for in a film review? A sophisticated breakdown of themes, a more mechanical look at the film as a whole (directing, writing, etc) or a simple star/directional thumb as an "unspoilered" recommendation?
idk the context of this but this woman is fucking awesome
>>217356004she's funny sometimes but I really don't get the simping
>>217356004She finally watched the new Avatar movie and was just talking about what she liked.
>>217356029she's visibly autistic and so autists all over the world will imagine she'd actually be approachable.
>>217355938Those kinds of critiques are less important than knowing that the critic's tastes align with my own. If I'm consulting a critic I want to know if a film is worth my time watching, breakdown in tone, imagery and other things are for discussions after the film. So I want a combination of mechanical and endorsement after I've vetted their taste.
>>217355938I've NEVER seen any reviewr actually use a formula. example:Elements of Film: Acting, Directing, Cinematography, Production, Writing, etc.Each element having a stated percentage value of weight(subjective) and peculiar to the genre.nope its all retards. DUURRRR ME LIKEY THIS ME NOT LIKE THAT.
report eceleb threads as off topic
>>217356029its part of disney marketing. they point at her and say "this is the female audience it totally exists guise"
>>217355938I generally don't.
how the fuck does this woman make 9 million dollars a month on patreon when she makes one 1 hour video every 400 days
>>217359175Being born a woman has its advantages
>>217359175A few months back I went down a Jenny rabbithole and she has Patreon-exclusive content she shits out every month.Mostly her rambling about things that would not warrant a release on YT.But I get people would pay for their waifu even if editing is minimal and subjects are not that interesting.Those vids have been ripped on a popular Patreon ripping site I don't remember.
>>217359175Damn, is it really $9m a month? Jenny is worth 9 figures?
>>217358778This. I don't care about whatever pseud bullshit some pretentious twat learned at university, I'm not going to critics to read a fucking dissertation, if the film is complex enough to merit it then I'll spend time thinking about its themes myself because I'm not a rom-temp IQ moron. What I want from a critic is a very basic yae or nae - the world of entertainment media is a sea of slop and shite, so based on the fact they have tastes that align broadly with mine, did X critic think the movie was a worthwhile way to waste some of our finite lifetimes or not? That's the only value critics offer.
>>217359457>I'm not a rom-temp IQ moronJesus fucking kill me now.
>>217359436It's like $4-500k tops! He was just exaggerating.
>>217359541Yeah that makes more sense. Still like multiple times my annual salary in a month.
>>217359175she's unironically a once in a generation level talent at critique
>>217359594But it's it what she deserves? We might be still be getting a deal here.
>>217355938>filters /tv/
