The Great Debate
kys shill
>>217359073Good morning saar
>>217359073Alicia Vikander
Jolie is just too pretty
>>217359073Kate Beckinsale.
>>217359073she looks more like c viper than laura
>>217359073You have to be 18 to post here, chimp.
>>217359073>5 threads about this garbageBuy an ad
Jolie nailed it really.
>>217359073From the leftLara croftmale male
Surely not the trannie on the right
>>217359073Angelina Vivek or whatever her name is was awful casting. And the movie was even worse.
why is female gaze like this?
>>217359073Yes please.
>>217359073I choose the one from all the sfm porn.
>>217359073Jolie is the only real candidate here. But it'd be easy to settle this debate once and for all.
>>217359073WHAT PIECE OF SHIT FUMBLED BELLA RAMSEY FOR THIS MOVIE???? FIRE THE WHOLE AUDITIONING DEP
>>217361535that's femscout you moron
>>217359073Jolie obviously except her tits are too small (I appreciate the fact that the tried to make them look bigger with padding though).
Angelina nailed the look but all Tomb Raider movies suck
Player 4 enter the chat
>>217359073It's Turners lower half of her face that ruins it. That's all. Her nose and mouth area. Other than that the costume looks great. It's funny how reddit zoomers on reddit expose themselves by questioning "what are those glasses" when that's literally the original fucking Lara.Makes me think trannies are jealous and its some weird move to make studios not give them accurate looks. She looks fine minus her nose and mouth lol
>>217361674>Angelina nailed the lookNah. Lara Croft is supposed to be a well bred Englishwoman. Angelina looks like a trashy American.
>>2173590731 0 1
sophie turner honestly doesn't look bad but she's such an awful actress
>>217359073All of them taking turns sitting on my face brapping up my nose.
>>217359073Angie really just obliterates anyone else. They will never be able to beat her because she was too hot while also being able to serviceably act. These days they barely get hot women in movies anymore.
there's no debate
>>217362069It's more profitable casting a 6/10 woman, the female audience enjoys it when a busted bitch gets the 10/10 guy, and the hoard of brown men will still lust after the 6/10 as if she was a 10.
>>217359073All three suck goyslop balls
>>217359073Since the new movie isn't out yet, my rating is based solely on looks.Jolie >>>> Turner >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>VikanderConsider the fact that 'Tomb Raider' IP value came from Lara Croft's triangle-cybertruck tits..... The game itself was 'mid' at best, but people kept coming back, because dual-wielding fit chick with big boobs was what 90s gamers were into.Jolie, riding off her (father's coat-tails for starters, and her) sexpot image from movies like Hackers and Gia, proved to she had the body, the tits, the CSLs and sass to pull off being Lara Croft. IIRC, her casting was strictly due to fan pressure as well.Vikander is result of wokeism, which is why she never tracked with the fan-base. We get that they tried to emulate the thematic reboot games, but even Croft's design in those games was to pander to female audiences and cut down on 'male gaze'. And the movie followed that 'trend'.Now with Turner, I think what we got is a compromised middle-ground here. She does have the look, from the waist down and shoulder's up,... but where are the iconic tits? I mean, sure, at least Turner looks like she has tits as opposed to Vikander, but again it all comes down to why Tomb Raider is popular to begin with... the 'male gaze', the BIG TITS, the fan-service, the icon.To this day, Jolie hasn't been beat in their portrayal of Croft. But it still remains to be seen what Turner can do for the character (and the IP overall). But her acting in Game of Thrones and X-men doesn't hold out hope. Her acting has always been too wooden and stale.
>>217362442>riding off her father's coat-tails she was very accurately considered the best looking woman in the world, she didn't need to ride any coat tails to get a role in videogame movie. The only woman you could argue was better looking than her was Jessica Alba.
>>2173590731 best looks2 best nothing3 best costumethats all
>>217359073What an odd choice of glasses. Are they doing a 28 years later homage?
>>217359073I genuinely think Angelina is the ugliest one of the three. Middle one is a bit "doe"-y, and that gets me going, and Sophie Turner is sex-for-sport on legs
Petra Verkaik. Then Jolie. Then all the mutts can fight it out for the scraps.
>>217362734Original design
>>217362784actual homosexual take.
>>217359073>best boobs>FUCK U NU-LAURA, U SUCK ASS!!!>best cosplay
>>217359073marry-kill-fuck
>>217361795lel, begone homo
>>217361596finger lickin good
>>217362866That ain't the same.
>>217362928Angelina's "sex symbol" status was always a marketing ploy. Angelina Jolie is the original talentless nepo baby actress (Midnight Cowboy's Jon Voight's daughter) and would've never stayed relevant if she didn't jump around cocks in Hollywood. Where the fuck has she been since her divorce with Pitt? Exactly, fucking nowhere.
>>217359073Hands down Jolie Raider. She was just perfect for that role. Her successors can try all they want, but they will never be as iconic as Angelina.>>217361696Now this one is packing some serious heat its a shame how shit he looks now that he detransitioned. A shame really.
I remember around 1999 finding some website that had "the Search for Lara Croft" and a bunch of sexy models in costume. It was very exciting to find as an 8 year old.Might actually be this onehttps://members.tripod.com/digital_danger/wannabe.html
>>217363555
>>217363506She's 50 with 10 kids, she wouldn't be anywhere even if she stayed with Brad Pitt, dumbass.
>>217361596>NuLara faceno thanks
>>217362115Women don't watch action movies
>>217363555Comfy website design
>>217362442>She does have the look,No part of her looks like Lara
>>217359073I really want to fuck a Laura Croft cosplayer
>>217359073Most women are goblins compared to prime Angelina Jolie so there is not really a debate here...
>>217363667Most actresses still work after kids. She's just a shitty retarded bogged cunt who has to hang with her chinkcel kid because nobody likes or wants to work with her. 2006 was literally 20 years ago, man. You dont have to cope with being tricked into thinking Angelina Jolie was somewhat attractive by the Hollywood apparatus anymore.
>>217363866Your seething chud hatred for her is really clouding your judgement if you can't admit to yourself that she was very good looking in the 90s and early 2000s.
>>217359073They all look like trannies
>>217363907She looked good in ONE (thats 1 followed by 0 zeros) movie, hackers. That's it, that's all. And it's not even a "chud" thing, chuds are the ones saying Sophie and the other chick look bad.
>>217359073Angie mogs both of them.>>217363966You're gay and brown.
>>217359073I actually prefer Vikander. Always thought Angelina Jolie was overrated.
>>217363972So you were tricked in to thinking she was attractive in Hackers by the Hollywood apparatus?KEK
>>217363972gay
Alicia had some unused potential. There's a scene in her film where she flirts with a man as a way to persuade him, and here Alicia reveals a sexy and naughty side that we don't see again.
>>217359073>Debate
>>217364088Poor man's Anna De Armas>>217364016That was her second "big" role, she wasn't sold as a sex symbol yet.
>>217364452More like the white man's Ana De Armas.
>>217359073They're all shit1. Jolie has the Lara body but the outfit is off and her face doesn't look like Lara2. Second is not even close3. Sophie has the closest outfit but not the body
Left and it's not even close. Not even an a-list pedophile fan that's just how I see it.
>>217361607Her body will never look anything like that
>>217359073I wish whoever owned that IP originally didn't hand it over to dumb feminists.All the adaptions in the last 20 years have been nothing but spiteful. Like there was a committee for "fixing the problematic tastes of the audience".The essence of the character was a femme fatale action hero with giant tits, skimpy outfits and a knack for gymnastics. She explores ancient temples full of spike traps, giant rolling stone balls and fights against dinosaurs and mercenaries with giant guns. They just hate everything about this character because they think it's sexist and re-enforcing harmful stereotypes. So they kept changing her to a generic flat unsexy archaeologist girl who is in over her head all the time and probably lesbian. I just don't understand why this was allowed to go on for so long.
>>217365051>I wish whoever owned that IP originally didn't hand it over to dumb feminists.>All the adaptions in the last 20 years have been nothing but spitefulCan you name a single IP where this didn't happen?
Angelina obviously
