Are you excited for Tim Burton's remake of this beloved classic?
>>217361778stealth size threads usually last longer on /v/, try some shameless subject like 'Game adaptation when?'.You've tried /tv/ like 3 times and the threads died after 50 replies max
size threads on /tv/ are shit because it's just cringy collages of 3DPD actresses
>>217361778Attack of the Blueberry
>>217361778Not if she's Jenna Ortega.
>>217361778They can save money on special effects and just cast Debicki.
>>217361778A little. Like this much
>>217361953CUTE!
>>217361778I'm curious how they're going to handle Nancy Archer's characterization here. In the original movie, she's more or less a mindless zombie when giant (seriously, it felt like the script called for her to be a hideous mutant or something but the budget wasn't there so they just went with her as a giantess), but if the movie has her mind intact and responding "realistically" to turning giant out of nowhere then this is just going to be Monsters vs. Aliens but worse.
>>217361778Sure, why not. I've masturbated A LOT to the 90s remake, even though it sucks and is mostly boring
