>>217362478yea, it was alright
>>217362478Yeah, it fucking owns.
>>217362478Good cinematography but ultimately limp wristed like most war movies.
>>217362478Same category of movie as Gravity for me, Video Game Carnival Ride. Fun, but no rewatch value or depth.
>>217362478First hour was good, but got boring so I switched it off around the second half
>>217362478Appreciate the effort needed to pull it off, movie is meh but longshots kick ass
>>217362979It's literally made for zoomers with poor attention spams.They turned WW1, the war about painstakingly grinding through weeks of newly-invented hells to advance just a few yards, into a dynamic and fluid action movie.
It felt like a video game with the main character wandering into setpiece after setpiece
>>217362478Would never watch.
>>217362478it was pretty good
>>217363048trenches weren't everywhere you know
>>217362478We still need a movie that actually goes into the complexities and intricacies of the trench systems. Most WW1 movies just pay it brief lip service before launching into some other BS.
>>217364563Then make a movie about the Brusilov Offensive. Brusilov. It's fun to say, but it wasn't fun. Heh that could be the movies tagline.
>>217362478What separates film from other forms of art is cinematography. This movie excels at cinematography, therefore is fucking good. I've watched it three times already because there's always a new detail in its blocking, composition and visual direction in general.
>>217362478I've watched it a few times. Overall, really good. It might be my favorite war movie as far as visuals are concerned.
>>217362478i compare it with dunkirk in my head cause they came out around the same time, dunkirk blows 1917 out of the water. i thought 1917 was pretty boring
