Brutal mogging
>>217368860
>>217368860It’s fucking OVER!!!!
>All new series have no viewers but they keep getting made anywaysI thought the free market was supposed to fix this
>>217368899>Guys, I still don’t grasp the concept of Blackrock and their insistence on pushing The Message!!!!
>>217368925Maybe these shows just make money.
>>217368860>watching paramount+ via youtubeno one does this
>>217368964>Maybe these shows just make money.
>>217368899>>217368964>>217369108The point of this show is to inflate the value of the company and make line go up. They know nobody cares
>>217368860turned off SA halfway through watch the new RLM review of DS9, and after i'm going to start a new marathon of DS9 again. bye bye ST:ACK!
>>217369108>>217369210So they make money.
>>217368865It’s up to 40,000 views last I checked. Maybe once part of the public realizes that the lead actress has the initials HH, and us called “The Chancellor”, views will pick up.
>>217368899Investors say "give us safe, tested concepts" but the only methods we have to test an idea are focus groups and surveys and those are susceptible to well known human biases and lead to films that people will SAY are good but never go out of their way to watch. It was a problem in the 80s, it's still a problem now.
Cool, now review 28 Years Later you HACK FRAUDS
>>217369238They steal money from ignorant investors, yes.
100+ billionaires don't buy media companies because they want to make a quick buck or think it's a safe investment, they buy them to play god and brainwash the plebeians
>>217369604Class brackets have entirely different mindsets.While 90% of the Earth's population would murder each other for 10 million dollars, the elite don't even blink at it. Power is about control.
>>217368964They do. ...But think about what it means for a streaming show to "make money"They don't make money from syndication, or ads, or DVD sales - they make money by being a "profitable" and "known" "IP" that will fool investors into shoveling a little bit more money into your furnace. The figures they accidentally leaked a few months ago showed that many times more people are watching the old Treks than all of the new ones combined.In the streaming business you no longer need anyone to watch - you only need convincing "product"
>>217369446It's not a problem now - go and read that incredible expose on the cunts who lost billions for Amazon Prime.Their focus groups and surveys showed definitively that absolutely no one wanted to watch anything that they were planning on producing - so a sheboon wrote a memo saying... And I am not making this up... That "Statistics always favour white men"So they decided to ignore all the figures and just squirt out their relentless cunkgunk anyway. Subsequent testing revealed that no one wanted any of the things that they determined that no one wanted, and Bezos eventually got tired of the humiliation and put a white man quietly in charge. With cunts, the dumbest version of the story is always the true one.
>>217369604
>invest a bit in company>just enough to start influencing things>make them make really retarded shit>stock value tanks>swoop in a few years later to buy out the company for the IPs>stupid fucking gwilos
