>Look for movie to watch>The more recent it is the more horrible it isWhy is this the case? How do we fix it? Will independent auteurs re-emerge using AI that isn't slop? Will it just be fed into our visual cortex through Neuralink? What was your favorite era? Let me know if I'm missing any.
What are the 2 lines? And what's up with the labeling of the y axis?
>>217371652>britiiically acclaimed
ayo where's my Hays Code niggas at? sheeeeitt deez new films aint shit.
>>217371652Favorite era? Now. This one. Embarrassing that you're too dumb to pick out something good to watch.
>>217371652>Late 70s to 2005 isnt the true peak of cinemaFuck off with over glorifying old shit because a handful of classics are admittingly really good
>>217371854like looking for a diamond in an outhouse
>same distance representing 40 years, then 20 years, then 30 years, then 0 yearsIs the graph AI generated?
>>217371924No shit?
>>217371882Guess that's how it would seem to someone really dumb.
>>217371856Watch picrel. >>217371759I actually lol'd. >>217371918Yes. I really just wanted to make an inverse proportion in LaTeX but I had Gemini do a not terrible job of hallucinating.>>217371924>People need AI to tell if AI is AI >>217371854Bait.
>>217371992>bro thinks he's the only one who knows about Griffith Also, you don't get to shit on AI if you use it for something as lazy as this.
>1930s >goodnot watching your boring ass black and white boomerslop
>>217371992>Bait.Nope.
>Q < (1/t)t
