>>217383008I agree. It is WRONG that those tits are not in my mouth, god damn it!
>>217383008is her vadge showing
>>217383008It honestly is. Kids were watching
>>217383008I honestly think the design of this dress is incredible, when you see the thumbnail of any of these photos it looks as if her tits were clearly visible but when you enlarge the picture they're just kind of there
The amount of seethe she causes merely by existing is wonderful
>>217383008White knights here will tell you this is a degrading humiliation ritual
>>217383008>I don't like niggers, however here are my titsHow does she do it?She can't keep getting away with it
yeah she doesn't have that waist to hip ratio.
>>217383008Hi wrong, I'm daddy!
I LOVE SYDNEY SWEENEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>217383145It took 3 people to get her into that corset
>>217383145If you think most men would pick right over left you’re insane
>>217384189girl on the left be like
>>217383008I like the one where she straight up showed her butt cheeks
>>217383145>she has a masculine shoulder-to-hip ratio
>>217383008agreed. she should have been rocking a huge pube bush to show off as well.
>>217383145Tranny vs Granny
>>217383145Double chin on the right.
>>217383068It's honestly so weird.I've noticed that when women tell men which celebs they find attractive, it's usually guys like Chris Hemsworth and the like.And men will agree because they can easily see why women would like guys like that.Yet, when men tell women they like Sydney, or women like her, the women are somehow taken aback or get outright angry.For some reason, what they think men should find attractive and what men DO find attractive are vastly different things, but it's not the case with what women find attractive.
>>217383035They see worse on their smart phones every single day you bad faith shit eater.
>>217383008Will I get banned if I post Kanye's wife outfit on that board? Because it was next level compared to this.
>>217383008
>>217386006He dates cheap hookers who cares if they are naked
>>217383008It's Turd-Butt Woman.
>>217384117>I LOVE SYDNEY'S WEENEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Gay
>>217384730My baby girl is smooth as silk.
>>217384872Ehh if they say bieber or some twink it is seethe nation in the comments
>>217386088>cheap hookersAnd Sydney is not cheap anymore, is it what you're implying?
>>217386193Nobody cares if some npc whore slave gets nakedSydney occupies a goddess archetype in our culture
>>217383008if you are gay
>>217386319>Sydney occupies a goddess archetype in our culture
>>217386401Every era has a few women who function as:>a focal point for male desire>a reference model for feminine beauty>a cultural shorthand for “the ideal girl of the moment”Those figures don’t have to be the most talented or the most famous. They just have to embody the fantasy clearly and simply.Examples from earlier eras:>Marilyn Monroe>Farrah Fawcett>Pamela Anderson>Megan FoxEach of them occupied that same slot at different times: not just “attractive actress,” but symbolic woman-of-the-moment.
>>217386531Sure but if you truly believe that swiney is filling that spot, something is wrong with you. Just ask the average grandma in a big European city who Sydney Sweeney is, and she won't be able to answer correctly.
>>217386733Marilyn Monroe was not a household name to rural grandmothers in Europe in 1953 either. That didn’t stop her from being the archetypal woman of her era.Same with:>Pamela Anderson in the 90s>Megan Fox in the late 2000s>Farrah Fawcett in the 70sMost older people outside pop culture bubbles couldn’t identify them at their peak. That didn’t matter. Archetypes live inside the active demographic imagination, not in retirement homes.So the proper question isn’t:>“Does a random grandma know who she is?”It’s:>“Is she a reference point for what millions of men picture when they think ‘ideal woman right now’?”Within that zone, young and middle aged men, internet culture, mainstream entertainment, Sydney clearly occupies that slot. She generates:>intense admiration>intense hostility>endless comparison>constant media fixationThose are the exact symptoms archetypal figures always produce.
>>217386792Ok bro whatever. She's got nice tits but that's it. She may eventually become a sex symbol of she manages to get a leading role in a blockbuster, but it hasn't been the case yet.
>>217385908not all of them
>>217386902That’s backwards.Sex symbols don’t become sex symbols because they get blockbusters.They get blockbusters because they’re already sex symbols.Look at the historical pattern:>Pamela Anderson became a sex symbol before any serious film career.>Megan Fox became one from a few scenes in Transformers, not from prestige leading roles.>Marilyn Monroe was an icon long before she carried “blockbusters” by modern standards.The status comes from cultural reaction, not from studio credits.Right now Sydney already generates the exact signals that define the role:>outsized male enthusiasm>constant media fixation>polarizing discourse>instant recognizability inside the active demographicThose are the metrics that matter. Awards and tentpole franchises are secondary.Your “grandma test” and “blockbuster test” are attempts to impose criteria that conveniently exclude her after the fact. But archetypes are defined bottom-up, not top-down.
>>217383008This image is artificially enhanced. The real thing is not like that.
>>217383035Anyone who seriously holds the view that people need to live their lives walking on eggshells because parents cannot even be slightly fucking bothered to be discretionary with what their children view need to neck themselves.
>>217383008Sex is good, zoomer.
>>217384872Yeah, women are retarded, bro.
>>217383068>white>beautifulNot surprised at all, the lesser races has always coveted our characteristics. They even use harmful bleaches on their skins and hair to look like us, lmao.
>>217383008Lol why are they so saggy alreadyIsn't she only like 26?
>>217386137>BieberWhite and blondes win again, lmal
>>217383008sociopath
>>217387349They are too heavy not to no?
>>217387349That's how natural ones respond to gravity. Only porn tits stuffed with bags of saline remain perky forever. They do, however, have other attributes which make them aesthetically unpleasing.
>>217383020No, she's wearing spanx or some other shapewear.
Sweeney is the hottest actress of today but if she was around in the 90's she'd be a 5/10
>>217387755That’s simply retarded More like a 7
>>217387755I've been re-watching shows from the 00s and awestruck at how attractive the actresses are at least face-wise.
