ok what actually happens to the film industry when people are able to generate their own entertainment with ai? the tech is only going to improve here’s a shitty ai movie https://youtu.be/L1fiDe0movc?si=SiNq65Pwqu4k2SAW
>>217395794GOOD MORNING
>>217395794Maybe it means the market will be flooded with a million shitty Avatar ripoffs.
>>217395794I’ll be sold when AI can produce a convincing scene of two characters having a conversation rather than just strings of trailer imagery like this.
>>217395794SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR
End of DEI
I for eagerly await making my day dreams a reality.
AI will accelerating what has already been happening without AI. People watch a lot of shit that's not movies, especially short clips on their phones. AI will provide an endless stream of that stuff and it will continue to suck up a big % of attention. Studios will rely on recognizable IP even harder than they do now. Studios will make money and strengthen their brand not by making good movies and shows, but by being the ones that control "official" Spiderman movies or Harry Potter or whatever.>but people can make their own with AIYes but people want a coherent canon and the social element of taking about the latest release. That's going to be the main draw. The people who have the authority to bring you the next official chapter of [thing].
>>217396244I know people care about official status but I'm not so sure that's going to remain so.I'd cite Star Wars and Star Trek as counterexamples; a lot of people including myself tend to disregard the newer stuff and just don't think of it as even being related to the old.Star Trek Continues however is well worth watching and it's just a fan series.
Saturation will lead to distaste and disengagement. Entertainment changes is a red herring anyway. When you can hand wave away war crimes and incriminating footage as AI and forge credible-enough videos of people you dislike, truth goes out the window and tribalism and justification to persecute innocents increases. Besides auto weaponry and other obvious military applications, AI's real threat will be its ability to manipulate news cycles more than propaganda already does. Michael Jackson won't just be accused of pedophilia, somebody will make credible footage of him performing sex crimes, and if enough people decide that it's true, willfully ignoring the possibility that it isn't, then it's good enough and he goes to jail. But this will happen to smaller people with no defense, too. Talking about movies, games, and students submitting shitty Chatgtp essays is nothing compared to the implications it will have on perceptions of truth.
>>217395794Its gonna be the same impact as Youtube creators had, they basically start to become part of mainstream. AI content creators will become mainstream
>>217395794Good morning sir!
>>217395794Nobody is gonna watch a film that is just an 90 minutes of me but 10 feet tall and made of 900 lbs of pure muscle using my three foot long prehensile penis to murder journalists and brown "people" except meSo, since there would be no one to discuss my magnum opus with I would get pretty bored and want to watch someone else's creation so at least I could talk about the parts I liked and hear other people's point of view.
>>217395794Man, imagine if people eventually get their own cameras. That'd be fucking insane.
