You see, what we're actually trying to do here is, we're trying to get a feel for how people spend their day at work... so, if you would, would you walk us through a typical day, for you?
indians deserve jobs more than entitled whites
>>217400417I set up in the conference room and interview people about what they do at work all day.
>>217400417I have people skills. I am good at dealing with people.
>>217400506Oh, so you're a consultant too?
>>217400417>A “typical day” normally consists of focused, uninterrupted work that produces outcomes the company actually pays for. What makes today atypical is that I’m being asked to pause that work in order to narrate it, step by step, while it isn’t getting done.>Talking you through a hypothetical version of my day does not reflect how the job is performed, improve how it’s performed, or add any value to the business. It replaces execution with commentary and converts productive time into a descriptive exercise whose only tangible output is delay.>In a real day, tasks are prioritised, problems are solved, and deliverables move forward. In this version of the day, those same deliverables are stalled so we can discuss them in the abstract. From the company’s perspective, that’s a net loss of value.>If there is a specific process, bottleneck, or decision you need visibility on, I’m happy to address that directly. Otherwise, describing a “typical day” while preventing one from actually happening is not a productive use of anyone’s time.
>>217400851sounds like you're not doing any work at all desu
I follow orders from my manager
>>217400417This scene wouldn’t exist today because every office computer is bugged. My work computer logs every keystroke and mouse click. There’s spyware installed that takes a screenshot every half hour to make sure I’m only doing work related tasks. My job knows what I was doing Tuesday at 11:42 AM.
>>217401049See, here's the thing, Anon. Who's to say you aren't using your phone to watch videos, or listen to podcasts that you downloaded before coming in to work?
>>217401124But that’s against the rules.
