>>217405041maybe as a light motive or a small reprisal.
Well yeahthey know you childless goyslopping millennials will soiface hard if they do
>>217405041I can not wait for this guy to die.
>>217405041>ZimmerEven deader on arrival than black Snape
>>217405041>Bleeding FingersThe fuck is that?
>>217405041>Hiring Hack Zimmer in 2026Jesus Christ, what are they thinking? Couldn't they have used Djawadi or Britell? The showrunner worked on Succession, surely he could've gotten the latter
>>217405874>DjawadiBasedhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnFdDqSDRDE
>>217405041No. They'll use rap music.
I'm sure this guy is involved in shady dealings to be so prominent in Hollywood soundtrack work. For me, it's when Zimmer somehow snatched up the scoring gig for The Simpsons movie from the guy that had dutifully done all the TV episodes score, and then all Zimmer did was a second-rate approximation of the Alf Clausen cues.
>>217405041No one cares
>>217405041They don't deserve to.
>Will they reuse the John Williams theme?
>>217405809it's a reference to how zimmer hasn't actually made anything in decades and all his work his done by is interns
>>217406067100% with you.Damn them.
>>217405041Swapping out John Williams' theme for a new Hans Zimmer theme will not allow Harry Potter to escape it's title of dullest franchise in the history of movie (and soon to include tv) franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.>a-at least the books were good though"No!"The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>>217406232Zoomer Slop spam>>217407070Classic Kino shitpost
its going to cater to frumpy auntsthe /tv/ meltdown will be entertaining, but the show wont be
