>Hmmm I want to rewatch that old film, I think I'm gonna buy the latest Criterion release, surely I won't go wrong with it
Why do they do it?
>>217407108top - original bluray releasebottom - criterion release
>>217407108>purchase a bluray>upset when it's blueIt's in the fucking name
This is why I only watch black and white movies these days.
>>217407132It's just the blue on the blu-ray disc seeping into the image over time
>>217407212Don't Criterion fuck those up too nowadays?
>>217407215no wonder bluray is dead and streaming is the future
>>217407108how does someone do this to a film and then sleep soundly at night
>>217407331The same way they would chop them down into 4:3 30 years ago. Very few people actually care about replicating the exact experience.
>>217407383The 4:3 chop was something of a technical necessity.This was uncalled for violence.
>>217407383that actually makes sense retardthey did that because of tvs it doesn't make fucking sense to put blue filters in movies
Why do they do this? I know in some circumstances it's supposed to replicate the "look" of film projection but more often than not it's just a blue filter
>>217407108bottom is more accurate, full spectrum lighting was pretty expensive and rare in the 70s and 80s. it was always either yellow or blue. it was a plot point in joe vs the volcano, but color grading erased it, so tom hanks is complaining about what looks like "normal" lights being soul sucking.
>>217407426>>217407446Fucking kill yourselves. You're probably the same kind of fags that like the HD Seinfeld release where they chop the show up to make it 16:9. Star Trek TNG's Blu Ray got it right by preserving the original aspect ratio.
>>217407461because you believe everything that some faggot posts on siamese airbed construction forums on internet
pissfilters ruined movies
>>217407744Ridleyslop makes me miss piss filters
>>217407587I'm not defending it retardI'm saying it makes sense why they did itit makes no sense to put blue filters
>>217407811reminder that the grey and brown colorgrading in ancient history films was invented by ridley
>>217407552no it's not mann you fucking blue filter retard
>>217407832Blue filter is the trend so they're chasing the trend with no thought of why
>>217407811Ridleyslop movies are nothing but pissfilters
>>217408004
the predator blu-ray is the worst thing everi think they used blurring or something like a photoshop filter to get rid of the film grain
>>217408092I hope they never release a piss filtered Waterloo movieImagine looking at this and thinking it needs color grading.
Where do you ACTUALLY go to learn what the best release of a film is and what quality it was released in?
>>217407446what does the gibberish on the bottom mean? It looks identical to the middle one
>>217407331it's what happens when you restore without the film negativesthey try to compensate the color loss by adding it in digitally and offsetting the temperatureand since blue degrades faster than the other two colors in old film all of these restorations end up with either a blue or greenish tint
>>217408198this is color graded retard
>>217408092what is this upscaled garbage
>>217408245https://caps-a-holic.com/ you can compare releases with this
>>217407768I really wish someone would add the colour back to all those harry potter movies. Even askaban
>>217408619thank you kindly
>>217407205> called blu-ray> ray is actually red and not blue at allBlatant false advertising.
I don't know where you can watch it online, but the HD re-release of Oldboy is actually a rare example of color grading being better in a later release.
>>217407108I have never been in a room with lighting and coloring like the bottom in my entire life.This just doesnt exist in real life.
>>217407768I like the comfy 6th movie.
