[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1768685644355069.jpg (171 KB, 1000x1489)
171 KB
171 KB JPG
Critters 2 is far superior to Critters
Nothing you say will change my mind
>>
>>217410952
I wish the Chiodo brothers had done more, maybe a Killer Klowns 2
>>
Critt3rs mogs them both.
>>
>>217410952
You know you're wrong.

While 2 has boobs and maybe is more "funny" it lacks the wholesomeness and comfyness of 1
>>
>>217412129
I liked 2 more as well. Scott Grimes was born to be a star.
>>
Critters 1 had the farm ufo thing going on and for that I pick it over 2. I'd even go so far as to say night of the creeps is a better version of critters 2.
>>
>>217410952
>contains breast expansion scene
no shit it is
>>
File: critters_april.jpg (45 KB, 1024x576)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
>>217410952
The first Critters had the hot sister and Billy Zane getting eaten. The second one did not have this.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.