"We're All In This Together" editionPrevious: >>217410267
fuck offt. shranbae
>>217425097I recommend you don't make a bunch of "sore loser" threads. They'll only be considered spam, then you'll go on vacation. Don't do that to yourself. I say that because I care about you deeply.
Star Trek sex with Shran
>>217425222TNG "Conspiracy."
so what was wrong with the OP image?
Based janny nukes the tranny cartoon OP image. This is an acceptable compromise.>>217425239Trolling. By your own admission.
>>217425263It wasn't even remotely trolling, nor am I. I'm just trying to share my Lower Decks fandom. After several lackluster Star Trek series, they finally made one that hits.
>>217425282>I'm just trying to share my Lower Decks fandomWhen the show is so aggressively bad, pretending to like can be considered trollingIt's as if someone pretended to like Velma and /co/, except that place actually bans trolls
>>217425315You can hardly call it "aggressifvely bad" when it beats both VOY and TOS on Rotten Tomatoes.
>>217425355To be fair, an actual rotten tomato is better than VOY
>>217425355Now show the real rating
>>217425389lol
As much as I consider Elves to be superior, they aren't the only good guys in Star Trek
>>217425355>>217425389>>217425414and Star Trek Picard is better than The Original Series, The Next Generation and Deep Space Nine! I mean just look at the rotten tomato score!!!!!!!!
>>217425464We're data driven. Even if the data contradicts our veefee feefees biases.
>>217425417That doesn't look like Star Trek.
What ever happened to Valley Forge?
>>217425473I too defer to paid journalists. It's the Star Trek way. Engayge!
>>217425475Appearances can be deceiving. Lower Drecks looks like TNG but it's a generic adult animated lesbian romcom.Prodigy might look like The Clone Wars but it's the Trekkiest Star Trek has ever Trekked since 2005.
>>217425263holy fuck I love this janny
>>217425498Go back to /co/, tranny.
>>217425355Enterprise mogs Discovery so much, it's not even funny
Discovery was a mistake. Rather than making it, Paramount should have doubled the budget for Strange New Worlds.
>>217425498based>217425505cringe
>Alexander Hilary Kurtzman (born September 7, 1973) is an American filmmaker. He is best known for co-writing the scripts to Transformers (2007), Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (2009), Star Trek (2009), Star Trek Into Darkness (2013), and The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014) with his writing and producing partner Roberto Orci, and directing and co-writing The Mummy (2017). He made his directorial debut with People Like Us (2012), co-written alongside Orci and Jody Lambert.Jesus wept
>my lane: stayed in>my outcomes: visualized and manifested >my grindset: sigma hustle>my swagger: infinite>my chicken: origami
Why did she do it?She did she spy on the Japs?
>>217425593>Tik>Tok>Space>PromBRUTAL
>>217425639ORIGAMI CHICKEN JOCKEY
Anybody ever notice this stunt guy knocking himself out?
>janny deleting cartoon OPs and sanitizing the schizo's threads for usHoly based. Alright, I forgive the janny all his trespasses for this one.
>>217425690Come on down to ACK, we got>Dal from Prodigy but more obnoxious>My Mrs Incredible footfag fanfic>WALL-E Crusher the photonic wunderkind>literal draconic Malfoy>Jemima'Hadar>Nig Totoro >Pig Notaro>Operabot 2000>Gayless the Quite Forgettable >World's Worst BetazoidsAll we need now is a masked quirk chungus to be our Magic Pixie Breen Girl
>>217425489immediately banned upon using the IRC to contact the janissaries to try and get this troll dealt with
Well, I'm off to watch "Star Trek: The Motion Picture", just to remind myself why I hate it so much. Wish me luck!
State of the watchalong?
>>217426369Quite petite
>>217426369>>217426405with most exquisite
>>217426369star trek sex on de beach with da watchalong
I calculated the ROI of Star Trek movies. I took budget and box office (USD) figures from Wikipedia and used this formula:ROI = (Box Office − Budget) / BudgetGrouped by era.TOS (Original Series films)Star Trek: The Motion PictureBudget: $44MBox office: $139MROI: ~216%Profitable, but expensive for its time.Star Trek II: The Wrath of KhanBudget: $12MBox office: $97MROI: ~708%Massive hit; best ROI in the franchise.Star Trek III: The Search for SpockBudget: $16MBox office: $87MROI: ~444%Very strong return.Star Trek IV: The Voyage HomeBudget: ~$23M (midpoint of $21–25M)Box office: $133MROI: ~478%One of the most profitable Trek films.Star Trek V: The Final FrontierBudget: $33MBox office: $63MROI: ~91%Underperformed; borderline failure.Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered CountryBudget: $30MBox office: $96.8MROI: ~223%Solid comeback.TOS summary:Low budgets and huge ROI. Only Star Trek V seriously underperformed.TNG (Next Generation films)Star Trek: GenerationsBudget: $35MBox office: $118MROI: ~237%Strong financial start.Star Trek: First ContactBudget: $45MBox office: $146MROI: ~224%Financially successful and well received.Star Trek: InsurrectionBudget: $70MBox office: $118MROI: ~69%Disappointing return.Star Trek: NemesisBudget: $60MBox office: $67.3MROI: ~12%Clear flop; did not break even.TNG summary:Early success followed by sharp decline. Nemesis effectively ended the TNG movie era.
>>217426295>why I hate it so muchBecause you are low IQ
Kelvin TimelineStar Trek (2009)Budget: $150MBox office: $385.7MROI: ~157%Modest success; barely profitable by blockbuster standards.Star Trek Into DarknessBudget: ~$187.5M (midpoint of $185–190M)Box office: $467.4MROI: ~149%Essentially break-even after marketing.Star Trek BeyondBudget: $185MBox office: $343.5MROI: ~86%Financial flop.Kelvin summary:Despite high box office totals, massive budgets and marketing costs killed profitability. One modest success, one break-even film, and one flop - not sustainable as theatrical blockbusters.Overall conclusionMost profitable era: TOS films (especially Wrath of Khan and Voyage Home)Most consistent success: Early TNGBiggest failure: NemesisModern problem: Star Trek does not scale well to $180M+ budgetsThis is why the franchise ultimately shifted away from theaters toward streaming and TV.
>>217425639my moments: teachable
>>217426745Thanks chat gpt, so you are retarded, got it
