The Most Autistic Edition EverPreviously, on /trek/ >>217410267
>>217432825>It's a genocide run
star trek sex with shran
I don't know what this op means and I don't care to find out.
>>217432948fuck offt. shranbae
Recently started watching TOS. Do I watch the other series in release order or is there some secret meta? How do you wish you had watched everything?
>>217432899What was Insaneway's craziest moment?I know Tuvix gets talked about a lot but for me it's either the time she tried to torture a guy from the Equinox and was only stopped by Chakotay or the time she jailed Tom Paris for trying to stop a genocide
>>217432970Are you going to seethe about this for the entire thread, as usual? Try discussing Star Trek instead.
>>217433016>Try discussing Star Trek instead.star trek sex with shran is the best subject
>>217433000Things are easiest to parse if you watch it in release order, though back in the day a lot of us just watched it as random reruns.
>>217433000put it on. leave it on.
MAJOR KIRA. WE NEED TO TALK
>>217433000Release order is fine. Just stop at Voyager. If you want the experience Treksters had when the shows were coming out, you can watch TNG, DS9 and VOY together in release order episode by episode. It doesn't really add anything.
>>217433185And if possible, turn on the RiffTrax commentary!
Should i start NG with season 3?
>>217433338The first two seasons still have some good episodes, and the bad ones you can just laugh at.
>>217433233I've heard the ones after Voyager were pretty ass. I never considered watching them episode by episode in chronological order, and as interesting as that sounds I probably won't. I feel that it would just be too confusing. Fun idea though. Thank you.
>>217433129Good point. I have seen a few scattered episodes as reruns on my own, but I do want to sit down and watch from end to end.
>>217433398Are you suggesting it's OK to laugh at some TNG episodes? I have it on good authority that means you're not a "real" fan, and should now be harassed and shunned endlessly. Don't look at me—these aren't MY rules.
>>217433398Yeah TNG seasons 1&2 being unwatchably bad is a complete meme
>>217433402You're replying to a nutrek D&C shill who is trying to lump Enterprise in with nutrek, Enterprise is kino and the last of classic Star Trek
>>217433517ENT was pandering to coomers and people traumatized by 9/11
i dont believe the star trek world would ever exist and wouldnt want it to since it would call for everyone to be eunuch who serve one purpose. i would wage war on that society to establish individual freedom of thought and living.
>>217433338Start at Season 1.
>>217432825One of my favorite gags in all of Star Trek is when Kirk wakes up in a dungeon next to a skeleton and starts to call out "Bones" but then stops himself when he sees it.
>>217433548
>>217433517Trek fans mailed the enterprise writers the contents of their kitchen garbage can.
>>217433000NO do not watch it in release order watch it in production order
>>217433517ENT crawled off to die in 165th place and crashed UPN in the process with no survivors.
SFAnatics, looked good for our series.
ent is great sometimes
>>217433338no, you retard
>>217433777correct and checked
>>217433517ENT is not good but it involves so many of the core movers and shakes of Berman Trek that you can't separate it from the other shows, so it just becomes the worst of them instead of "Not Star Trek."The core of the show and its approach to storytelling is ultimately the same.They tried to "modernize it" by sexing it up which is far less egregious than the shit you see these days.
>>217433547>pandering to coomersStar Trek always did. In fact, it's one of the many reasons nu-Trek isn't real Trek.
>>217433002The time she woke up the genocidal warrior race after 900 years of hibernation and unleashed them on the species using their old wormhole network.
>>217434001these boomer Star Trek memes are so shitThis is the kind of mistake Data would make, not Spock
>>217433338No, faggot.
haha nutrek troons pwned
"Even more so than Lower Decks’ comedic antics, (SFA) is a significant changeup that initially shares more DNA with CW teen dramas like 90210 than Kirk or Picard’s high-stakes missions. But with time, this bizarre mishmash that no one asked for turns out to be an unexpected opposites-attract situation, a deeply sincere series that successfully combines adolescent awkwardness with plenty of sci-fi circumstances: interstellar diplomacy, ethical dilemmas wrought by technology, and nightmare alien cannibals from deep space." - AVClub
>>217434042Wrong. Data wouldn't even notice the suggestive subtext.
>>217434051Wow, oldtrek geezer seethers turn on someone trying to be a TNG fan. Or is this because they aren't a "real" fan?
>>217434111>t. guy who doesn't remember when Data called Geordi a "lunkhead"
>>217434063
damning
>>217434042Data would either not know what a butt dial is at all or precisely know what it is, with no in-between.
>>217433777
>>217434252Never understood this argument because only TOS even has these differences and none of its episodes are in any way serialized so it doesn't fucking matter at all
>>217434275Yep, it's pointless nerd shit as expected from nerds.
>>217432825
>>217434307I miss when we used to argue about pointless minutiae because the soul of Trek itself was not constantly in jeopardy from profiteering pieces of shit.
>>217433338There's some essential episodes from the first two seasons but not THAT essential. I googled it and found a list of ones to watch. But don't skip the first episode for sure.
>>217434334
>>217434368People have always argued that the latest trek is not real trek and an insult to television as well. Things have not changed.
>>217434252>>217434275>>217434307>>217434368The production order was how the writing room originally intended it. The episodes were swapped around to front load the action at the beginning of the season. APOLOGISE for your retardation.
>>217432825>8 more weeks of people arguing over streaming ratings for a show they'll never watch>Until next year
>>217434470No because it does not matter in any meaningful way and just serves to confuse and turn away new viewers.
>>217434503I watched it though but I do not care about ratings
>>217434505how the fuck is things happening in chronological order going to confuse anyone you goofy fuck?
>>217434456The difference being that nobody will re-evaluate Kurtzman Trek in a positive light as time goes on.
>>217434505No grandpa it takes 10 seconds to pull up a production order list
>>217434152Sure I do, but "lunkhead" isn't a sexually-charged term. Also, it was part of Data's experiment with human "friendly jibes and insults".
I'm sick of this anti-lunk bigotry
>>217434456>>217434565Compared to where it started... they already have.
>>217434565Even the Kelvin movies have no cultural relevance. Nobody argues who played the characters better. Nobody's asking for a fourth entry. They don't make anybody's personal lists. Almost completely forgotten.
>>217434683And what sort of social interaction with peer groups are you basing that on? Online only? Anonymous only? Or something else?
>>217434683Nobody asked for the Kelvin movies.
>>217433860>Starfleet Academy is already on track to becoming one of the most popular and successful TV shows of all time.
