Was this shot really necessary?
>>217437813You’re not attracted to a fox, are you?
Only someone with a brain wiped smooth by the most degenerate furry porn would find this provocative in any way
>>217437813It should have been Judy
Did the fox get to do anything in the movie? I get the impression that he was sidelined.
>>217438239he was the eye candy
I guess The Bad Guys 2 was for straight furries and Zootopia 2 was for the gay ones.
>>217438312so I guess you went to see Zootopia 2 opening day then? hahaha just kidding anon, just wanted to make a goof ;)
>>217437813Was this shot really necessary?
>>217438312Bad guys was incredibly gay...snake and wolf get cucked by lesbians. There is no money in straight furries, they dont exist.
>>217438143but producers of this much magnitude all know what they're doing. they do not have to do that AT ALL. they have full control in every way possible.btw canine paws are bony and ugly.
>>217438312>implying