[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1758403691692852.png (1.36 MB, 1080x1555)
1.36 MB
1.36 MB PNG
That's about 800M LESS than Way of Water and 1.2 BILLION LESS than Avatar 1
Cameron is losing his audience (Chinese people) FAST.
>>
File: 1672943844714531.webm (1.01 MB, 498x372)
1.01 MB
1.01 MB WEBM
It will re-release before Avatar 4
>>
>>217444623
avaturds really were dreaming of 3 billy lmao
>>
>>217444623
Cameron on suicide watch lmao, couldn't even beat Zootopia 2. Furchads won.
>>
>only 1.5 BILLION
what a flop lmao
>>
>>217444655
This. Avatar 4 doesn't supposedly release for like 3 years. A year and half from now they'll just release 3 again. Every movie will have the trailer before it with that deep voiced trailer guy

>*sweeping heyahoya music*
>ONE LAST CHANCE TO EXPERIENCE THE MAJESTY OF FIRE AND ASH, AS IT WAS MEANT TO BE SEEN...ON THE BIG SCREEN
>>
File: Varang cute.jpg (85 KB, 1028x953)
85 KB
85 KB JPG
>>217444623
Avatar 4 and 5 confirmed!
>>
There will be an Avatar 4 but it'll heavily use AI slop. But don't worry, you won't notice the difference since the film already looks like fake vomit.
>>
>>217444623
Maybe he shouldn’t have made the same movie 2 times in a row.
>introduce potentially new interesting antagonists
>finale is another boring RDA battle on sea
>Quaritch jobs again
>>
>>217444623
everyone laugh at avatarfags
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
LOL
>>
>>217444623
Avatar is garbage. it feels like a Disney committee of weirdos and commies make these Avatar movies. It's unrecognizable as James Cameron films. I wish he'd just go away, but Hollywood needs him because his name is still a selling point for retarded normies.
>>
>>217444623
The novelty has worn off, any studio would still kill for movies that can make $1.5 billion in this day and age. Avatar 3 will still make half a billion in pure profit even with the bloated production costs
>>
>>217444623
Cameron needs to give up on this and do something original and fresh. This shit is so boring
>>
>>217444623
>>217444750
>>217445296
>>217445314
>>217445919
>>217445920
I calculated Avatar ROI
Formula ROI = (Box Office − Budget) / Budget

Avatar
Budget: ~$237M
Box office: ~$2.92B
ROI: ~1,132%

Once-in-a-generation phenomenon. One of the most profitable films ever made.

Avatar: The Way of Water
Budget: ~$350–400M (assume ~$375M midpoint)
Box office: ~$2.32B
ROI: ~519%

Still massively profitable, but ROI dropped by more than half compared to Avatar (2009).

Avatar 3 (assumed)
Budget: ~$350M (likely similar to Avatar 2)
Box office: ~$1.5B (assumption)
ROI: ~329%

Very successful in absolute terms, but continuing decline in return .


Avatar’s box office remains massive, but each sequel earns less profit per dollar as budgets rise, showing clear diminishing returns. This mirrors the Star Wars sequel trilogy and Jurassic World, where every film still crossed $1B but delivered weaker ROI and declining enthusiasm.
>>
>>217444623
This one Is better than the way of peepoo, maybe people are tired
>>
Does that mean we won't see the Navi slant eye clan led by Michelle Yeoh?
>>
>>217446136
3 was very similar to 2. I think a new setting and a cliffhanger for the finale will make 4+5 finish strong
>>
I don't know a single person that has seen the second or third film or even talks about Avatar on any day basis
>>
File: Real life vs subhumans.jpg (112 KB, 1080x1080)
112 KB
112 KB JPG
>>217446208
>>
>217446233
I can tell you're Indian
>>
>>217446104
The reality is, these movies are falling into major hollywood accounting issues. The actual cost of production for 3 was lower than 2. Except the cast got a much bigger pay day. Worthington, Saldaña, Weaver, Lang and so on. We're talking 10m or more for each. That's about 40m-50m for the leads alone. There's no way they take a pay for for 4 and 5.
>>
File: w.jpg (60 KB, 600x691)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
217446258
>>
>>217446104
So how come we get endless Jurassic World movies but Avatar gets cancelled?
>>
>>217446483
I don't think Avatar 4 is cancelled, but this anon is right >>217446377
The cast won't receive as many millions no more
>>
>>217446483
Jurassic World movies are made for less than half the cost of avatar. $150m vs. $400m
>>
nobody seems particularly enthusiast about Avatar 3, not even hardcore fans.
there's a serious risk that the next Avatar film will lose a ton of money, because there's no way that Cameron will make one for cheap. He has said that he's finding ways to make these films less expensive, but unless he starts using AI, I can't imagine how.
The only sensible option is to cancel 4 and 5 and make a single final Avatar movie and market it as the ending of the saga.
>>
>>217444623
Still good
>>
>>217444623
China won
>>
>people don't want to watch the same movie five times

OHNONONONONO CAMORONBROS HOW COULD THIS BE HAPPENING
>>
>>217445067
>but it'll heavily use AI slop
where does this idea even come from. neither ILM nor weta use 'ai slop'.
>>
File: 28-Years-Later[1].jpg (25 KB, 350x438)
25 KB
25 KB JPG
>>217446978
>people don't want to watch films that go in new directions either

oh well more minecraft and mario films I guess
>>
>>217447224
minecraft was the best movie last year so i am ok with that



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.