What are some examples from Television & Film of government propaganda backfiring hilariously?
>>217461321What I love about this character is that only a few years ago she would have been depicted as a tramp with tattoos and piercings but I guess that's too problematic for woketards now so she's just made out to be wholesome.
>>217461370The character design is fascinating. The only explanations I can come up with for why they didn’t make the nationalist character an ugly white guy are:1. Someone involved in this project was secretly based2. The characters were designed by a younger cohort who grew up in the diversity era to the point that they feel purple-haired female representation is necessary even for the bad guysMy guess is the second option is more likely, but I truly don’t know.
>>217461321DONALD TRUMP AND ICE ARE MURDERING AMERICANS AND YOU ARE MAKING RACIST MEMESFUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU
>>2174614883rd option. They intended the evil to be enticing, as in regardless of how good she looks and safe she seems these bad ideas can come from anywhere and you have to be vigilant (don't judge a book by it's beautiful and free spirited cover), and just naturally chose their style as a base model for it.
>>217461596That is basically option #2.
>>217461522I can’t even tell if this is bait these days.
>>2174614883. It was made with AI and this is what it came up with after searching for words like "hateful" and "narrow-minded".
>>217461596Closed borders isn't evil. It's literally the whole point of having separate nations.
>>217461488They wanted to make the average white woman feel like she was bad for wanting a secure and homogenous society. They figure if they get the women then they'll nag on the men. They have always targeted women first
>>217461596>shitlibs create succubus out of the first principlesWhat a time to be alive!
>>217461731There is a 0% chance any AI would generate a teenage white girl with purple hair and a choker from inputs like “hateful” and “narrow-minded.”
>>217461370chokers are disgusting
>>217461961>implyingThey are the cutest safe edgy accessory. Way better than piercings or tattoos.
>>217462012just because they're not piercing/tattoo tier doesn't mean they're not gross
>>217461722it's definitely bait
>>217461961
The white race is saved
>>217462023Eh, the dyed hair is worse than the choker IMO but we are getting into puritan territory at this point.
>>217461961How the fuck did chokers got a bad reputation? Historicaly they were a classy piece of attire as late as the 40s.
>>217462091>Historicaly they were a classy piece of attire as late as the 40s.Nobody calls it the Chaplin mustache
>>217462091They have a great reputation. They are worn by submissive girls with daddy issues.
>>217462121Yeah, because there is a guy we assiciate with it more. Was there some kind of gigawhore in the 50s with a choker that ruined it?
>>217462091>How the fuck did chokers got a bad reputation?When I was in HS in the U.S (late 2010s) they were strongly associated with slutty girls that liked to give head. It was sort of a signal that a girl liked to suck cock and was down.
>>217462046she isn't wrong
>>217462048For all the young whippersnappers out there. Back in the day blue/purple hair was asociated with old conservative women.
>>217462170When the British Empire was still around?
>>217462214It was a thing as late as the 80s.
>>217462140>Was there some kind of gigawhore in the 50s with a choker that ruined it?No it's much more recent. And not focused on one particular person. But maybe the last 5-10 years. I'd say most things you would have associated with punk, wild, independent, fun girl got co-opted by basically hardcore feminists or controlling judgemental prudes, however you want to look at it. It's weird as fuck to me when I try and think about it. but the women I see or hear most complaining about sexual morality, or men's behavior have unnatural colored hair, random tattoos, nose piercing, and yes, chokers. Also glasses. It's the standard modern annoying cunt look.
>>217462170Damn I haven't thought about Are you being served in awhile.
>>217462046this retarded bitch got ratioed hard by someone calling out leftwing women protecting third world rapists
>>217462170>>217462214>>217462239
>>217462272>got ratioedI still don't know what this means.
>>217461522Funny thing is whenever this shitlibs asked to shelter these illegals they immediately repulsed by the thought of it and always frothing "it's da guvment job to shelter them". If they're loving these illegals so much why don't they took care of them en masse in their home?
>>217462287It refers to the ratio of upvotes to comments. It's relevant on websites where downvotes or 5-star ratings have been removed by the friendly corporate overlords, like twitter or youtube.
>>217461722then you probably have the same IQ as most blacks
