>Star Wars >galactic civilization with solar-system destroyers >can't cure baldness>Star Trek>galactic civilization that can change reality >can't cure ugliness>NuTrek>can't also cure obesity, blindness, paralysis Since when scifi became so dysgenic?
>>217467519>/scifi/ is deadGreat
>>217467519>Since when scifi became so dysgenic?Because current media has to reflect what we are and what we have rather than what we could be. Can't have the masses getting any ideas now, can we?
Star Trek has always sucked.But this is fucking clownshow retarded.I blame DEI writer's rooms.
>>217467598Current media since... the 1920s or even before.>>217467559Why?
>>217468626>Current media since... the 1920s or even before.No, media used to be hopeful, inspiring and uplifting up to even as recently as a mere 30 years ago. The turn of the millennium is where everything went to shit.
>>217468669Dude, in OG Star Wars, aka the 70s you can see bald dudes in the films.Even before Star Wars, you can recognise the pattern to current cyberpunk and scifi dystopias in pretty much any scifi film. That is why I wrote 1920s, because scifi in that decade, despite being cheap and silly af, was at its peak of optimism. After that is just >X new technology is created>NOOOO! Humans must kneel to G-d ("Light Side of the Force", "Galactic Federation", etc), goy! You can't become God yourself! (Hollywood forbids you try to do a Human supremacist utopia.)
