[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: ourguy.jpg (138 KB, 854x728)
138 KB
138 KB JPG
>David: I fell in love with digital video and, uh, now I love digital video. I’m through with film.
>Interviewer: You’re moving to digital video?
>David: Yeah.
>Interviewer: Why?
>David: A huge amount of reasons. Even though I love film, it’s a dinosaur. Everything about it is a dinosaur, and it’s soon to be gone—pretty much forever. It happened in sound first: tape, analog—it’s so gone you can’t even get a roll of tape hardly anymore. Everything’s digital. Same thing’s happening with images.
>Interviewer: The photochemical process…
>David: Dinosaur. A dinosaur. Dead. Completely ridiculous.
>Interviewer: Ridiculous?
>David: Yeah. It scratches, it breaks, it’s dirty—nothing but dirt on it. Um, and no two prints are the same. It’s a nightmare. You can hear the projectors chattering… It’s just—it’s a nightmare. (laughs)

Your thoughts?

source (2006 interview):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6koYFk6jlA

miss him so much, btw.
>>
>>217467587
As someone who has actually worked with film before I completely understand him. It's torture.
>>
>>217467587
Film seems kinda pointless when you can just replicate the effect on digital
>>
>>217467587
filmcels btfo
nobody can tell the difference between modern digital and film, let alone the difference between how many milimeters the film is or whatever.
>>
>>217467774
>>217467792
only an accomplished filmmaker can trash film like that. you both are a pair of clueless tools, you dont know shit about what youre talking about
>yeah, exactly my thoughts, film sucks!
LOL
>>
People who spend a lot of time with something can become technologyminded.
Same with people who produce music. All they can talk about anymore is how it sounds and how it's produced, not if it's actually good.
Sure, Disney Whore #69 has bombastic production value. I still prefer some 70s oi band's bootleg recorded through a radiator.
>>
>career dies after switching to digital
No pain no gain.
Notice how there's no kino shot in digital?
The effort you have to put in film weeds out the mediocre.
>>
File: images (27).jpg (24 KB, 727x422)
24 KB
24 KB JPG
>>217467792
>nobody can tell the difference between modern digital and film

Maybe you can't, zoom zoom del filtero.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.