>Terrible, yes, but great.
What do you mean "great", you fucking chud?
Great as in grand, not good
>>217468468ladies and gentlemen, the average american grasp of his own language
>>217468468Did Dumbledore know the guy selling wands to his students was a chud?
>>217468485Grand implies good, you absolute retard.
They changed the original title from Philopsher Stone to Sorcerer Stone because Americans were too dumb and didnt know what Philopsher meant
>>217468522>Philopsher
>>217468516>they called him "alexander the great" because he was a good guy>it's a "grand piano" because it gives to charity
I love the idea of the wand shop owner being a mega chud. We know they exist. Slitherin is basically one big junior chud league
>>217468542>much fun was had by all in the Great War
>bad, yes, but good>sucks, yes, but awesome>mid, yes, but amazingActually, it makes sense to me.
>>217468522>They changed the original title from Philopsher Stone to Sorcerer Stone because publishers assumed that Americans were too dumb and didnt know what Philopsher meantFify
>>217468468>Hitler did terrible things… terrible, but great!
>>217468589Yes
>>217468574>>bad, yes, but goodThere should be a word for that, like badgood. Or bagood. Yes, Voldemoort is bagood.
>>217468468> If it's true, what you say, that he has the Elder Wand then I'm afraid you really don't stand a chance (and that's a good thing)
>>217468516Grand implies MIGHTY. You are a dumb gorilla.
>You see people tend to misunderstand the Dark Lord, Mr. Potter. And the amount of deaths he allegedly oversaw during the The First Wizarding War has been greatly exaggerated
>>217468542>Intentionally misinterpreting the message sure will help my causeLike I said. Retard.
>>217468468Somehow I got it into my head that this dude was some kind of ancient immortal neutral party who had been making wands for centuries.Tommy Boy is just another bump in the road to him and he will continue on as usual.I was wrong though
>>217468516>>217468760Grand is literally French for 'big'.Great is literally English for 'big'.
Terrible just means it causes terror, not necessarily that it is bad.Great just means impressive or awe-inspiring, not necessarily good. This is precisely the language someone would use if they were trying to describe something they had strong feelings about yet were unable to attribute their own feelings on the subject. Ie wand shop guy is a crypto chud
>>217468620Carmella, this pork is really gabagood!
>>217468791>I w- was t- talking French all alongLike I said. Retard.
>wait, words can have more than one meaning? That shines brightly!
>>217468468I also watched Timcast last night OP
>>217468522
>>217468749>The torture of the Longbottoms? I do not believe that the dark lord had any knowledge of that. However, some of his ideas for revamping the Hogwarts education system were actually quite reasonable if you ask me
I'm watching picrel right now. It's shoddy in many ways, but I like the setting.
>>217468883>actual good goy spics and not jeets brutal
>>217468468
>>217468516American education, everyone.
>>217468516You are why the title was revised to 'the sorcerer's stone.
>6 million muggles? Merlin's beard, do you know how many cauldrons that would take...?
>Terrible, yes, but also kinda awesome
>>217468760I feel like a lot of anonymous and even non anonymous debate is>I'm being wilfully obtuse
>>217468839>Implying etymology, the origin of words, doesn't delineate intentNta but you're retarded
>>217468516Esl-kun, I...
How come John Hurt wasn't cast for any of the Harry Potter movies, he seems like he could've been a character.
>>217468586>They changed the original title from Philopsher Stone to Sorcerer Stone because publishers correctly assumed that Americans were too dumb and didnt know what Philopsher meantFify
>>217470175OP's screenshot is literally from a Harry Potter movie
>>217468468Great as in very impressive, from a strictly neutral and objective point of view of course
>>217468791Voldemort was a big guy?
