Kino will never be the same.
>>217468727>Authentic Motion, the world’s first creative driven motion control tool to make scenes feel more authentically cinematicwhat the fuck...
>>217468946Basically, OLED TVs have a problem with motion sometimes in movies. The pixels change so quickly, that in a slow panning shot, the image can be kind of juttery. Your eyes don't perceive it as fluid motion, but as a series of still images. TVs have motion smoothing capabilities that does fix that issue, but it makes movies look like daytime soap operas instead of actual 24fps cinema. What Dolby Vision 2 allows is for instructions to be included in the metadata of a movie to tell your TV to apply motion smoothing only to specific shots, and to leave the rest of the movie alone.
>>217468727will HDR movies actually look decent on normal TVs again or is this another bullshit paywall to get you to pay $8k for a new TV so the colors aren't washed out?
>>217469078It does require a new TV since it uses a new chip, so an older TV with Dolby Vision 1 can't just download an update. The early impressions seem promising though. On premium TVs, it will use a light sensor to adjust the levels so it looks correct in your room. It will also automatically shift the white balance to a slightly cooler color temperature if you switch to sports (when instructed by the metadata) so that the LED lights will look more like you're actually there.
>>217468727considering how long it took studios to fully onboard to Dolby Vision 1 I'm not even going to pay attention to this shit until 2030
>>217469218It's not going to be on this year's LGs anyway. Sony hasn't announced their lineup yet so we'll see. I'm not ready to replace my LG CX from 2020 yet, but in a year or two I think I'll look for one with Dolby Vision 2. Right now Peacock has said they're going to support it, but that's all so far.
Here's me with a Samsung with only HDR10+ on it. I am Betamax man.
>>217469540Are they going to give up on that eventually? Streaming services all focus on Dolby Vision. HDR10+ is an afterthought.
i have LG and they won't support it apparently
>>217469635Amazon still support it, as do AppleTV+. I don't know what percentage of TVs sold are Samsung, but I'd imagine it's still pretty high. Dunno why streaming services don't just offer both formats.
>>217469778Samsung is the bestselling TV brand, but yeah, their premium HDR is not nearly as widely used as Dolby Vision. The whole reason they use HDR10 is that it's free, and for Dolby Vision they'd have to pay Dolby a royalty. When you put it that way I wonder why other manufacturers don't support it in their TVs. >>217469717Not this year at least. I'd guess next year's models probably will.
>>217469850Knowing Dolby they likely designed Vision in such a way that there's a time-saving through line from how the studios master for real theaters that translates directly to the home theater spec
>>217469944That makes sense. DV is prevalent enough that it would pretty much stop me from considering a Samsung when I'm ready to upgrade. I do love my LG, I only have minor nitpicks, but I might look at a Sony for my next TV since they apparently have the best image processing, and their TVs are the gold standard for picture accuracy out of the box.
