how much seamen should a captain have?
Keira was 17 in the 1st movie and 16 in Dr Zhivago when she had a sex sex scene where she was naked and 15 in The Hole where she was topless and also a scene where she went into the boys locker room and showers and several of them were full frontal nude in front of her. Thoughts?
>>217469654>Thoughts?I'm going to have a wank now
>>217469579That's gay
>>217469733
>>217469579>how much seamen should a captain have?Okay, first of all, let’s get one thing out of the way: “seamen” is a countable noun. “Seamen” can literally be counted individually, whereas something like “sand” or “water” cannot, without introducing a unit of measurement (e.g., “grains of sand” or “liters of water”). So technically, your original phrasing was a subtle grammatical anomaly—a violation of standard quantifier usage that, if we are being honest, triggers the inner pedant in anyone with a functional understanding of syntax.I cannot overstate the importance of this distinction. English quantifiers are not just whimsical suggestions—they follow strict rules. You cannot use “how much” with something that can be enumerated individually. That’s literally what “how many” exists for. So the grammatically correct formulation, preserving your intended meaning, would be: “How many seamen should a captain have?”Now, I know what you’re thinking: “But bro, it’s a joke about pirates and… you know.” Sure, and yes, there’s a homophonic pun in there, but from a strictly syntactic and semantic perspective, that pun does not magically change English grammar rules. Countable = “how many”. Uncountable = “how much”. End of story.“But it’s based!” you might retort. “Based” on what? Ignorance of the grammatical structure which gives our communication coherence? Kino cannot comport with communicative chaos.In summary: Yes, the joke is funny, but let’s not pretend English doesn’t have rules just because we’re talking pirates. “How many seamen” is the only form that is actually syntactically defensible. And as an aside, according to all known laws of aviation, there is no way a bee should be able to fly, especially if he’s a big guy.
>>217469733You can't wank to her before 2004 anon.
>>217469579These movies are the hottest she ever looked
>>217469579Why is she a slut in all movies she plays?>pirates>the one she bangs a german during ww2>spanked by freud to orgasm>love actually>domino
>brown eyes>bri'ishYou're all here getting hard over such subhumanity? Ffs.
>>217469579It's got nothing to do with the captain and everything to do with the size of the ship. Bigger ships require bigger crews to efficiently operate, if a ship is too crowded, then efficiency drops because men have to crawl over each other to reach the ropes they need to pull. Every ship has a max and min capacity.
>>217470891Someone shove this nerd inna locker.
>>217471280why did her eyes look down at their dicks?
>>217471697Because she is a slut.A very pretty slut.
>>217471816but she was only 15 when she recorded that scene
>>217472058Well, maybe she thought that these were lollipops between their legs or something like that, maybe she just love candies I don't know.
