what went so incredibly wrong with this one? The director made the good first part and then called it quits after this one because everyone hated this.
Gunn reshot the entire movie himself and ruined it, under Snyder it wouldve been amazing
>>217476586You joke, but the director complained about interference and then joked that since he was paid, there was no hard feelings.
covid era wokeslop, many such cases
>>217476556Better question is why hasn't Ms. Currey graced us with more kino since?
>>217476556Why are they all wearing the Gatorade logo??
>>217476556>director made the good first partIt was fucking awful. Why get a horror director to make the ultimate wishfulfilment capeshit?Why didn't they lean into making it a Christmas movie?>>217476708This is the real question thoughever.
>>217476745shazam 1 was good thoughbeit
>>217476758It was derivative and uninspiring, completely forgettable movie with zero cultural relevance (and outdated bc flossing).Plus it's not like it's appropriate for young kids either because of needlessly edgy shit like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwJA04-zpvQ&t=88
>>217476880thats not edgy at all, it's cartoon violence on par with bugs bunny, you are incredibly--just incredibly--retarded
>>217477259I'll send $100 to a charity of your choice if you find me 1 (one) Bugs Bunny cartoon where a room full of people are slaughtered
>>217476880the movie is pg-13, buddy boi, it's not that bad
They decided to go some weird original direction since the obvious thread of "Shazam vs Black Adam" was not possible. Also, the disconnect between the Billy and Shazam actors felt MUCH more pronounced, he was nearly an adult and every time he switched to Shazam Levi is immediately mugging for the camera and acting like a four year old.
>>217476556Is it true that there's an R-rated cut of this locked away in the Warner Bros vaults?
>>217477454PG13 used to mean one or two swear words, this would've gotten a 15 rating just 5-10 years earlier.I personally think it's bad for young kids that everyone has a pottymouth and I think it's a fucked up tone shift for a lighthearted superhero movie to feature demons biting the heads off of people.
>>217476556Much like Wonder Woman 1984 and Aquaman 2, it was an uninspired sequel that even the directors that made the first movies couldn't follow-up on.>>217476586Gunn became head of DC well after it was filmed.
>>217477284https://youtu.be/Z2yITNSWPLs?si=d8CI748ggptc77DcTokyo explodes in this one
>>217477680Wonder Woman's sequel issues were less that it was uninspired and more that it was retarded and weird. And way overlong.
>>217476556Because its shazam, why is the movie about a bunch of gay ass kids no one gives a fuck about? Its billy batson, the stupid power splitting thing shouldve just been a one-off for the end of the first movie
>>217477776All the praise from the first movie got into her head and made her go full retard
>>217476708My man.
The real answer is because the villain was 3 ugly ass old ladies. No one wants to see that
>>217476556Mary Marvel
>>217477680>Gunn became head of DC well after it was filmed.But he was still a producer during the post-production phase of the movie, where he demanded rewritings and reshoots. Including adding his wife as a cameo.
>>217477623>>217477635>>217477943>>217478017i buy shazam 4k bluray for she
>>217478137Never happened.
>>217476556>what went so incredibly wrong with this one?Academy Award winner Michelle Yeoh
>>217478178Sure, Gunn fanboy.
>>217478137>where he demanded rewritings and reshootsYou just completely made that up.
if gunn doesn't cast >>217478017 in the dcu he's a genuine fucking idiot. she would be a good wonder woman and a great starfire or even zatanna
>>217476556I didn't mind it. The villains were weak and the story was not as good as the first.But I had some fun with it.
