...again
>>217481300I didnt realize Amanda Seyfried was such a draw
>>217481359>this movie will totally flop>it only succeeded because of AmandaWhich goalpost will it be next tranny?
The movie is ultrawoke and Sweeney sucks in it.
>>217481300This movie is woke
>>217481443Not him but Seyfried is a big name with a big following and reasonably big tits.
if art is political now it means we are fucked. either enjoy something or don't, you don't need a reason either way.
And it'll go way past 300 with the way it's going
>>217481558Lol she is not a big name, what are you smoking
>>217481572look at those powerful warlocks
>>217481300The book sold about a billion copies, it probably would have grossed a lot more without Sydney.
It's a woke movie, how did woke lose? Op might be retarded desu
>girls watch it because it's a girl movie>Guys watch it because Sweeney's boobs are shownThis is what's called mass appeal.
>>217481300>>217481522>>217481538>>217482034>>217482300This just proves that movies today are made for women because they are the audience. They literally just buy the rights rights to whatever fembrained book is blowing up on BookTok and they make over 300 million dollars. Look at the box office for It Ends With Us. It's about a 40 year old neurosurgeon who is attracted to a 37 year old woman who looks like a homeless bum. It's literally roastie insert fantasy. Welcome to cinema.
>>217482403Maybe audience just got bored into capeshit which looked progressively worse every year
>>217481587Art is political only now?
Fuck this overrated slop watch the Korean one from 1960 legitimately more erotic and impactful
>>217482418That guy is an idiot. He doesn't realise that the Sweeney movie succeeded because it had Sweeney in it, which attacted a male demographic that otherwise wouldn't care for this kind of movie.
>>217481300based
