>28 Years Later>Avatar: Fire and Ash>Avatar: The Way of Water>Black Bag>BlackBerry>Caught Stealing>Dune>Dune: Part Two>Ferrari>Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga>Hamnet>Limbo (智齿)>Marty Supreme>Megalopolis>Puss in Boots: The Last Wish>Red Rooms (Les chambres rouges)>Reflection in a Dead Diamond (Reflet dans un diamant mort)>Shin Kamen Rider (シン・仮面ライダー)>Shin Ultraman (シン・ウルトラマン)>Tár>The Apprentice>The Beast (La Bête)>The Invisible Fight (Nähtamatu võitlus)>The Killer>The Northman
Now post the good movies.
>>217492884Why don't you post some (whatever decade)? Let's compare.
>>217492848The 20s are genuinely a bad decade for everything in society. Why did I have to be born as a young adult in this gay era.
Marty Supreme is kino but makes everyone on here seethe kek
>>217492848>5'9fucking tall women
>>217492901Lord of the Rings trilogy (Extended cuts)
>>217492922First one is alright. Weren't we talking good movies, though?
>>217492907>near unlimited access to media>near unlimited access to information you can use to self-teach>can comfortably work from home >can use AI to assist with redundant tasks They are what you make of them.
>>217492917>5'9>tallAm I missing something?
>>217492848Maybe 3 good movies on this list
>>217493780Make a counteroffer.
>>217493105You're underrating currency... when these great pieces of media were released, you felt like you were part of something rising to new heights... you were grateful to be alive now, and wondered what was going to come next.
>>2174929011980s>Robocop>The Terminator>Blade Runner>Predator>The Thing>Akira>Aliens>They Live>Ghostbusters>Spaceballs>Altered State>The Fly>Heavy Metal>Escape from New York>Weird Science>Cyborg>Short Circuit>Highlander>Wrath of Khan>Tron>E.T.>Back to the Future>The Road WarriorAnd that's just Science Fiction films alone. Movies have indisputably become worse over times and 2020 has been the worst so far.
>>217494306>you were grateful to be alive now, and wondered what was going to come nextStill applies. Earnest advice: Stop taking blackpilled thirtysomethings and their tirades seriously. It's not about the media for them, but where they themselves ended up in life.>>217494474Holy mid.
>>217492848>28 years laterFucking hell, genuinely stopped reading lmao.
>>217494474baby's first trip to Video Update
>>217492848Not bad, fucking terrible >dune 2I thought this post was serious at first
>>217492848Literally the only decent movie listed is the avatars and not because of the writing, story or acting either
>>217494530s-shut up
>>217494728You wouldn't know anything about decent movies.
>>217492884Fpbp OPs dilator in pieces on the floor
>>217493105Stop playing dumb on behalf of corporations moronUnless you’re paid to do it in which case kill yourself
>>217492884
>>217492848The fact that you posted an ugly woman in black-and-white with short hair, wearing a fucking leather jacket and a toothpick makes it painfully clear that you have shit taste in every sphere of existence and this post is nothing but a fucking joke same as your life
>>217492914Not really but if you need it to be that way for it to be good I understand black zoomer
>>217494867>not appreciating a good bait postJust admit OP mindfucked you and respect it
>>217492884The Killer and the Northman are good. Marty Supreme was alright. >>217493105You're Indian.
>>217492922>00s blockbuster series>>217494306>nostalgia >>217494474>manchild cartoon slop>>217494835>obsession with transsexuals>>217494846>t. wagecuck>>217494851>t. porn addict >>217494867>t. homosexualNoticing a pattern here.
>>217493105That reply is pure neoliberal cope. Every bullet confuses access with outcome.“Unlimited media” isn’t a benefit — it’s oversupply. Algorithms flatten taste, bury quality, and reward slop. Infinite content ≠ good culture.“Unlimited information” without pathways is trivia. Knowing things doesn’t convert into status, stability, or power anymore. Past eras had fewer books but clear ladders. This one has PDFs and no future.“Self-teach” to what end? Credentials are gatekept, industries cartelized, and hiring is ideological. You can master a skill and still be filtered out for optics and vibes.“Work from home” means atomization, no mentorship, no visibility, no upward mobility. Great for companies. Terrible for building a life.“AI assists with redundant tasks” doesn’t empower workers — it devalues them. Tools everyone has give no leverage. They compress wages and accelerate replacement.The line “they are what you make of them” only works if effort leads to reward, competence to advancement, contribution to meaning. That social contract is broken.People aren’t upset because they lack Netflix, Wikipedia, or AI. They’re upset because status, purpose, continuity, and future have collapsed.Earlier bad eras still had coherent culture, shared narratives, rites of passage, and trajectories. The 2020s offer convenience without direction.That’s not “what you make of it.”That’s managed decline with good UX.
>>217494530>stop having taste>fincher and mann are better than ever!You like ugly women and slop and have the worst possible attitude about it
>>217494934If it’s bait it’s not that funny it’s just pretending to like slop
>>217494943Yeah you have shit taste and need to shut your brown ass up and go jerk to butch dykes ok?
sure is midwit edgelord in here
>>217494530That’s not an argument. It’s status shaming as theory.Your “worldview” only works if:>dissatisfaction = personal failure>critique = cope>noticing decline = being “blackpilled”Which conveniently absolves the system of ever being judged.Also note the inversion:>You’re not allowed to say “things are worse” because that would imply standards existed and fell. So he reframes optimism as a moral duty: if you’re not grateful, you’re defective.Yeah you’re a slopper
>>217492848I'm with you OP. all /tv/ does these days is bitch about new movies instead of actually watching them. here is my chart just from 2025. I enjoyed all of them, and I already have a bunch of 2026 ones that I'm really looking forward to.
>>217495013>I made a bad post and now people are noticing >help me hrt!
>>217495046So I’m learning that non whites just don’t have the function of discernment
Young people don't come to 4chan anymore... how the hell are so many people chomping down on this obvious troll thread?
>>217495046This is late-stage culture defense:>”liking” things = maturity>standards = bitterness>discernment = whiningThat’s not confidence. That’s compliance fatigue coping.People in real golden ages don’t post charts to justify themselves.They argue about which masterpiece is better, not whether the era is secretly fine if you lower your expectations enough.
>>217495093Just like the 28 years later thread where people pretend woke doesn’t and never existed you have to guard your lack of taste by claiming it’s baitHow sad is that?
>>217494937>You're Indian.I am not. You calling me that asserts your own mediocrity, however. Be it the white kind or otherwise.>>217494955Just admit you aren't man enough to into potential. >>217494977Fincher is the same as always. Mann is at his peak. And the ugly woman comment beyond disqualifies you from being taken seriously.>>217495000Are you okay?>>217495045Cope.>>217495046Based.>>217495062see >>217494943
>>217492848>MegalopolisGet the fuck out of here.
>>217495148You post try hard dykes and assert things that are simply untrue I’m with the other anon now I think you’re trolling
>>217495105This. Who the hell still makes charts btw? Fucking nerds
>>217495175Go back to the club.>>217495190Is that how you cope with getting stomped? >it was just a skit, guys>the doctors will put my busted jaw and cracked skull back together no problem
>>217495105yeah sure bro, it's your standards that are high and not the fact that you come here to whine and don't watch anything. don't give methe bullshit that you watch older shit either, because outside of /film/ maybe, nobody discusses classic cinema anymore.>>217495195even as recently as 10 years ago we made 3x3 charts all the time. then tourists like you came along and most of the good posters - the "nerds" left I guess. sad.
>>217495249Present an argument as to why Megalopolis is a good film. Or are we not privy to the riches of your Emersonian mind?
>>217492914No it just hasn’t released on torrents so people here are seething they can’t watch it, not seething at the film. /tv/ will love it eventually
Black bag sucked just make a stage play if you really want to
>>217495249Yeah this is curry scented cope
>>217495305Hi jew safdieAll of your movies are the same scorsese high schooler ripoff shitGood time and uncut gems will be repeated by you until you die of tay sachs
>>217495277If you were one of the faggots still making charts past 2013 everybody was laughing at you, I don’t even think /mu/ gave a fuck about charts and /mu/core by then and their the biggest homos on the site
>>217495277if standards = whining, explain why every good era produced arguments about greatness instead of people begging critics to shut upyou don’t defend a living culture, you participate in itcharts are cope, not evidenceenjoying slop isn’t optimismit’s just low signal tolerancegreat eras don’t need mood-management posts to justify themselvesYou are a low vibration non white low test midwit moron nigger
>>217495305Cringe
>>217492848What will our nostalgia film feature?
>>217492848I haven't seen a single one of these films and I have no interest in seeing a single one of them but I will watch Crime 101 when a download is up. Thanks for asking.
>>217495105As >>217495093 correctly stated, this website is ripe with middle-aged losers. Expecting there to be an accurate assessment of reality rather than endless seethe doesn't seem wise at all. So no, of course there is no discussion about what recent masterpiece is better because all you're here to do is disguise-vent about your shitty lives.>>217495286Great Adam Driver and Shia LaBeouf performances, inventive visuals, it being centered around the union of heart and mind (story of the character of the technocrat poet).>>217495363Boring.
>>217495507when someone can’t explain why something is good, they explain why you are bad, that’s not critique, that’s ego triagemid taste always hides behind “you’re just mad”calling criticism “life venting” is what low iq people do when their bad taste can’t survive contact with standardsAlso imagine thinking your posts aren’t boring bitch at least this time you didn’t post some ugly ass Dyke in black-and-white
>>217495389https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/subject/3x3/start/2015-01-01/end/2017-01-01/order/asc/2015-2016, hundreds of threads, lots of discussion. just say you weren't there.
>>217492848
>>217495583Yeah, a bunch of socially desperate preening teenagers wearing fake taste like cultural merit badges signaling the right taste They still had better taster than you though, but to be fair, movies have gotten a lot worse, which your list proves
>>217495600Decent taste except for the final reckoning and tar and into the spider verse and Anora and beekeeper and nope and transformers one and glass onion ratings way too highHere’s my account https://letterboxd.com/gauntgauntgaunt/
>>217495583Yea and? Me and my 3 asian hooker gfs were literally laughing at you freaks flaunting your taste for hollyschlop flicks
>>217495663Based 3 Asian hookers anon
>>217492848Worst decade for everything.
>>217495673He knows which is the basis of this threads astonishing failure as he tried to deny it by posting some of the worst works of many directors filmographies
>>217495673The decade is fine, maybe even better than 2010s.
>>217495752not even close
>>217495780Why?
>>217495792What is this decade known for?
>>217495752You can’t just say 2+2 = 17 and run away like that
>>217495819SlopWokenessNiggersTranniesBad cgiBad writingBad marketingStudios becoming hostile to audiences
>>217495819All kind of movies.
>>217495792there aren’t even better action movies this decade than edge of tomorrow or fury road, all there is really is the continuation of the midwit a24 horror from 2010s
We need to go back to 2005-2010
>>217492848Pic related is unironically better than everything there, random but I was just watching the other day. Grim decade indeed
>>217495819White women hijacking old beloved franchises and crashing them to the ground with with identity politics
>>217492848gr8 b8 m8 i r8 8/8
>>217492848My favorite 2020's movies I've seen so far are "RRR", "Nope" and "Godzilla Minus One". I can't tell if I like movies less or Hollywood has gotten worse but I strongly suspect the latter given 2 of of the above are foreign films.
>>217495953It's not.
>>217496137Cope I guess
>>217494474anon, sadly you fell for the baitthis whole thread was a trap for you to post films you like/think are good, so that people can dogpile on your list and say it's all shit and you have terrible tastethis entire board has fallen victim to bots/shills whose entire purpose is cultural demoralisationso don't take it personally, you're not wrong, OPs list proves the modern movie industry is in the worst state it's ever been in by a wide margin, and your list is full of genuine classics from a time when movies actually had heart.For the record, you can tell the bots apart from their lack of nuance - imagine defending modern movies and then saying the likes of Terminator and Blade Runner are mid.Chin up
>>217496166NTA, National Treasure is just a Nick Cage meme movie. They can be entertaining, (my personal favorite is Lord of War), but I don't really think they're particularly good outside of The Great One's performances.
>>217495600>0.5 stars for Dune, Frankenstein, Weapons, Oppenheimer>5 stars for Transformers One and Spiderverse>4.5 stars for Tron:Arse, Saw X and The FlashIf this is real, which I honestly doubt, you legitimately have the worst taste I've ever seen. EVER. and I'm practically a boomer. How the fuck you're even on /tv/ without bursting into flame is beyond me.
>>2174957522010s is a pretty fucking low bar, but 20s has broken limbo records.1997 alone has more good movies than 10s and 20s combined.
>>217495921This is funny, because these movies are all terrible by the standards of the era, and yet still somehow better than most movies of the last 5 years.
>>217492884OP absolutely obliterated
>>217492884This, OP posted fucking shite or foreign crap.
>>217496345No, you're just nostalgic.>>217496362They aren't.
>>217496369>>217496380Dune1+2 were good. Not great, just good.Avatar is impressive in terms of technical achievement.That's the only good stuff I can say about OPs list.
>>217496203Good post
>>217496404I don’t think I’ve ever seen anybody get beaten this bad from all sides it would be admirable, but it’s not
>>217496471You just don't watch or care about movies outside of your childhood favorites. This is sadly the truth for most people on this board.
>>217496404>you're just nostalgicNo, you're just a zoomerHere's a test for you - 1940 had better movies than anything from the last 5 years. I was born in the 80s. Unless you care to explain to me how I can be nostalgic for a time long before I was born?And it's consistent, btw. Bar the occasional dud year, almost ANY year from 1946 onwards (war caused a slight drought) has better movies than everything from the last 5 years. I know because I've seen them, years upon years upon years of movies. Watched Ice Cold in Alex the other night, I would put that up against any movie you care to mention from the last 5 years with the possible exception of Dune.But of course, you wouldn't get it, because you probably consider any movie from before 2000 as 'old', you have absolutely no reference point for quality, you grew up in shit so shit is all you know.Get educated and/or grow the fuck up.
>>217496489You literally don’t know who I am, which means you are objectively in factually coping in this momentBut you already knew thisThis is becoming an exercise in humiliation for you
>>217496547It’s seriously offensive for somebody to come in and list a bunch of crap and act as if it’s somehow not below a previous standard when we are the ones actually going into depth about it and he just keeps saying nope nope nope nopeThis is why people are calling him a troll
>>217495600Anora is way too high, Superman is way too low. Solid list otherwise
>>217496547I'm not a zoomer, watched maybe 500 movies from 1910s-1960s.
>>217496596Both are equally worthless
>>217496602Weird how I don’t believe youExcept not really weird based on every post you’ve made in this thread
>>217496618I don't care, it's the truth.
>>217496316>you cant give animated movies with high production values 5 stars because, you just cant ok
>>217492884lol
>>21749284895% of your list is mid 7/10 flicks at best. Grim
>>217492848Bleak.
>>217492848I haven't seen any of those
>>217496618hahaha it really is just one delusional child, fucking hell
>>217496547>almost ANY year from 1946 onwards (war caused a slight drought) has better movies than everything from the last 5 years.Name all those masterpieces from 1947 that are better than, for example Tar. The only film I've seen from that year that was as good or maybe better was Black Narcissus and maybe The Lady of Shanghai.
>>217496748Did say there were a few dud years, and 47 is one of them, but to illustrate my point let's look at the years either side shall we?1946 - It's a Wonderful Life, one of the most beloved movies of all time1948 - The Treasure of the Sierra Madreboth absolutely mog Tar, just accept you're wrong, it's painfully embarrassing at this point
>>217496748>>217496831kek moved the goalposts to a single year from the 40s and still getting dunked on
>>217496651> high production valuesIt literally is a benchmark moment for lowering animation standardsGoogle any debate about stepped an animation in modern movies such as that or Puss in boots the last wish and you’ll see conversations on Reddit where people defend the lowering of quality as pro labor. They’re not even arguing it’s quality anymore. They’re saying that to go back to smooth animation would be fascistic or something which is hilariously ironic because crunch has only increased pressure on these animators has only increased. The difference is they are no longer allowed to strive for a quality or innovation into the spider verse. Serve as an excuse for every other movie to use shitty stepped animation and just say oh spider verse did it
>>217496831I wouldn't say they mog Tar, but they are fine films. And Tar is just one film. Other big films from this decade are Zone of Interest, Aftersun, Drive My Car, Anatomy of a Fall, whatever. No, I don't think it's a bad decade.
>>217496629>>217496739Nobody has any reason to believe that you have any knowledge about anythingFor all we know you’ve never seen anything outside of the shitty list you posted
>>217496966everyone is entitled to their opinion anon, art is subjective after all, but when literally everyone is laughing at you.... subjectivity has its limits, sometimes you just have really shit taste. probably better you just accept it.
>>217496966>drive my car>aftersunLmaoIt’s over
>>217496983He won’t admit it, but he will accept it
>>217496955Animators make union minimums so wouldn't increasing the detail be the pro-labor stance? Especially since there's a sea of unemployed art school grads in LA nowadays
>>217496955the animation in spiderverse was interesting in its innovation and creativity, but once you get past that, it's slop. even the animation running at around 5fps ruins the one good thing it has going for it, everything else is your typical formula of tired capeshit multiverse shenanigans with forced woke shit. The second movie has a PREGNANT spiderwoman just fighting bad guys, just awful. The soiwave of updoots on those movies is one of the worst ever - only interstellar is worse in that regard (dark knight had a bigger wave, but at least it has some merit as a movie)
>>217497036Well see that makes a lot of senseBut this debate for them isn’t about senseThey don’t want to discernIt hurts them too bad to realize that things have gotten worse
>>217497071It’s not even innovation as the technique was already used forever. They just simply used it as a full on gimmick, which is fine for one movie coming at it from that intentional angle, I have no problem with thatI have a problem with it being used as an excuse for lowering qualityI don’t even like how it was employed in the movie, I think it’s gay and obnoxiousMost people have been gaslit into accepting it as some new innovative thing when it’s literally going backwardsIt’s a middle finger to the audience
>>217496966>but they are fine films>desperately googles two movies his zoomie brain has never even heard of>drive my carthis is the funniest thread I've seen in ages
>>217497096Here's the downsides of 2D>low framerateWith the downsides of 3D>ugly and inhumanNow this is what we've been striving for
>>217497130Drive My Car is better than most American slop from any era. Wheel of Fortune and Fantasy is even better.
>>217496955I dont give a single fuck about other movies copying Spiderman like i dont give a fuck about movies copying licensed song beat drops from tarantino
>>217497096>>217497071OK, my take on why Spiderverse's "innovative" animation pisses me the fuck off:>OMG it's like a heckin' comic book brought to life, so epic!FUCKOFFFirst off you probably haven't read an actual comic book in your life, you just consume comic media through osmosisbut more to the point, you wanna see comic books brought to lifePIC FUCKING RELATEDget some damn tasteFUCK
>>217496596The extra star for anora is for the sweet tits
>>217497226uh oh, contrarian hipster faggots found the thread!oh wait no it's just OP samefagging again
>>217496966>I wouldn't say they mog TarThey do, I enjoyed Tar a lot, when it pans to the japanese cosplayers, absolute blissbut John Houston was seriously fucking with his big dong without magnum condoms when he directed The Treasure of Sierra Madre, not even in the same league as anything done this decade
>>217497318It's still just an American flick. I don't like to rate films like that, but there are plenty of 2020s movies I enjoyed as much or more than Treasure.
>>217492884fpbp
>>217497247Because Tarantino didn’t invent that, and it didn’t destroy cinemaIt’s not the same thing
>>217497318I actually prefer Rope from 1948, but I'm admittedly a massive Hitchcock fan. I love the technicality of it from back then too, the 10 minute takes, the illusion of real-time and a single location. Both are great though.
>>217497407I prefer The Red Shoes and Spring in a Small Town.
>>217497388>enjoyedsure, I enjoy some movies made this decadewould I go out of my way to claim that M3gan is better than The Diary of a Chambermaid? Of course not.
>>217497388wait a minute....>keeps referring to "American flicks">5-starred some shitty animations>actively hates anything requiring even a modicum of intelligence>5 star GodzillaYou're Korean aren't you? Wait, no, even they have better taste generally speaking....>3 star Bad Boys>3.5 for Nope.....you're African!Not just a nigger, but an actual African child, probably around 17 years old (if I'm being generous).
>>217492917Yes, I will
>>217497469what, over Rope and Madre??
>>217492848I've seen 19 of these, heres the ones I liked>BlackBerry>Limbo>Red Rooms>Reflection in a Dead Diamond>The BeastI hope Marty Supreme is great
>>217497549Yes, but I also enjoyed Treasure and Rope.
>>217497604Will admit I've not seen Red Shoes (the ballerina subject matter put me off) and not even heard of Spring in a Small Town. Care to share your views on them? Curious what they have to offer that puts them above two greats like Madre and Rope for you.
>>217495580>explain why something is goodI did.
