>mostly negative review>6/10
>extremely positive review, zero flaws mentioned>not 10/10 because "nothing is perfect"
>10/10>it’s okay - IGN
well you don't want to be mean.
>mostly positive review>6.6/10
>>2177827266/10 = 1/57/10 = 2/58/10 = 3/59/10 = 4/510/10 = 5/5You would never rate something a 0/5 or a negative 3/5 so 5/10 and below is only if you're angry about the movie for irrational reasons, like you felt "betrayed" by a decent or above average film sequel/prequel that failed to live up to it's predecessors and is therefore literally the worst thing ever made.
>>217783359This makes no sense, 6/10 is a good movie.
>>217783516>This makes no sense, 6/10 is a good movie.It is, if you're dogfucker. Normal people know that a 6/10 is vastly inferior to a 3/5.A 60% rottentomatoe score is just eww.
>>217782836>Jaws>4/10>"Too much water"
>>21778364460% is not equivalent to 6/10
>>217783760>60% is not equivalent to 6/10What is it equivalent to?
>>21778381460/100
For movies I rate 6/10 (60) for stuff I would consider rewatching. 69 for guilty pleasures, and 99 is my highest rating awarded (no movie is perfect)
