>best character in the books>worst character in the movies
>30+ year old adult male>children's media without any ironyThe programing worked
>>217783163Voldemort is objectively worse than Ron. By a lot. He kills millions
>>217783163He's an even bigger cunt in the books
>>217783511But Ron was sexist
>>217783163The books make no sense because Rowling refuses to ever describe what the characters look like beyond certain base attributes like hair color and "tall". That forces the reader to form their own headcanon about how the characters are aging and growing up. For instance, a lot of readers, mostly female, think Harry is a jock chad by Deathly Hallows, despite there being no textual basis for that.
>>217783511This, Ron isn't even in the top 7 worst people in Harry Potter. You have Voldemort, Umbridge, the Durselys, the Carrows, Fenrir Greyback, the Malfoys. OP is fucking retarded
>>217783575>Harry is a jock chad by Deathly Hallows, despite there being no textual basis for that.You mean besides being Quidditch captain, Triwizard champion, leader of the DA, and dating the hottest chick in Gryffindor
>>217783601>You mean besides being Quidditch captain, Triwizard champion, leader of the DA, and dating the hottest chick in GryffindorExactly my point. You have to infer what Harry looks like by what happens in the story and world around him. Those things imply that he is a jock chad. A better writer would just tell you.
This is why they cast blacks instead of gingers
>best character in the books >worst character in the movies
>>217783163>Yule ball in GoFI just watched this and it's like anti- fanservice.Both boys get cucked by the new older guys, Hermione cries because Ron is made jealous, they don't reconcile and he just fucks off.Honestly, that whole movie felt full of contrived drama and angst, the three are at odds the whole time.
>McGonagall buys Harry a super expensive broom even though he's super rich>Lets Ron go a full school year with a broken wand despite it being a mandatory tool for wizards and witches and Ron's family being incredibly poor
>>217783640>A better writer would just tell youIt's mentioned in the 5th or 6th book that he had a growth spurt and became pretty tall after being short previously.
>>217783640>A better writer would tell, not show"No!"
Try reading some actual literature, or listening I guess, as you're not used to the real stuff yet
>>217783832only Metamorphoses is worth reading
I've read the first book and watched two movies, I didn't notice a big difference between them.
>>217783832>What has Rowling achieved in one book, let alone seven?She entertained me, which is why I read fiction. When I want something erudite I read a history book
>>217783832I managed to read 4164 pages of Harry Potter in a week and a half without much effort
>>217783832Why did you steal that Quentin quote?
>>217783640Writers usually assume you're not stupid but maybe they're wrong idk
>>217783993WHAT THE HECK
