It's over.>Netflix Co-CEO Ted Sarandos has openly acknowledged that James Gunn’s Superman did not perform as expected, and he did it during a high-profile Senate hearing.>The comments came during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing focused on Netflix and the proposed Warner Bros. Discovery deal. While answering questions about theatrical releases and streaming practices, Sarandos unexpectedly brought up Superman, the DC reboot directed by James Gunn.>The source of the moment is public record. The exchange happened during the Senate hearing and is available on YouTube, around the 1 hour, 16 minutes, and 17 seconds mark.>Superman 2025 underperformed… this is coming from Ted Sarandos himself pic.twitter.com/cHiKvji36S
They said otherwise last year, and that was when there wasn't a massive merger depending on it underperforming. Hmm.
It's finally over.
>>217785770Wasnt Gunn friends with a convicted pedo?
>>217785770No.
>>217785770Nice link faggot
>>217785876Yup, convicted pedophile. But Gunn is pretty elonesque and probably doesn't get to go to the cool pedo parties
>>217786794Both Elon and Gunn are well-known pedos
>>217786942Gunn is an admitted pedo and Elon is an attempted pedo who probably just got frustrated and grabbed a kid at some point
>>217785850>They said otherwise last year,This time it was a CEO speaking under oath before Congress rather than part of Gunn's marketing campaign. Under oath, Gunnverse is a hard flop. >>217785770 just watch the video of the flop testimony:>pic.twitter.com/cHiKvji36S
The Gunn Cucks kept insisting that Superman 2025 was not a flop. But even a Netflix CEO acknowledges that it was a huge flop. The fact that it did not make more money than a 2013 movie(Man Of Steel) or a failed movie(JOSStice League), is a sign that Gunn's Superman did not live up to expectations.
>>217785770Good morning sir.
I liked it more than the Snyder Superman movies
>>217785770maybe the supershit fags will finally see reasonSnyderbros win (again)
>>217785770Oh no not the pedo you fuckers begged Hollywood would bring back from bang bang wazoo in space with Chris Pratt & co!
>>217785876>friends withanon...
>>217787500Cavill's superman wins in every regard. Watching Cavill as Superman makes me feel inspired, but watching Gunn's movie makes me want to scroll on my phone. I miss the world of Snyder's Superman, so no doubt this is a main reason why it's a box office winner versus Gunn's garbage. Just look at this shot from Snyder’s film.
>>217785770How did Gunn not get perma-cancelled for his pedo comments? He's not even a jew, so he doesn't have special protection. He must have blackmail on some studio owners.
>>217785770Underperforming is not flopping
>>217785770Have "they" released the Epstein files starring Hollywood personalities like Pedo gunn and others yet?
>>217785876There are rumors of how gunn fucked a boy but had it expunged and the tweets were part of a cover up where it all would be considered to be a joke
>>217788107Agreed.>>217788111Because he's woke. Plus the woke cult aren't anti-pedo, especially woke Hollywood.
>>217785876>Huston Huddlestonoh for fuck's sake that's not a real name
Do americans really have senate hearings on capeshit?
>>217789489No it was just a hearing asking whether Netflix deserved to purchase WB or notIf you watch the full video the Netflix CEO was nervous because of all the grilling about how they had like 40% of cartoons on Netflix be woke and how he didn't give a good answer on whether Netflix would pay residuals to performers, and he fucked up when talking about the 45-day window
nobody watches the actual video anymore. That's not what Ted Sarandos says at all. It's two separate thoughts on theatrical release windows. He says each movie is unique, he mentions that if a movie under performs that window might be shortened. He then goes on to further explain different theatrical windows by comparing Sinners and Superman and says Superman has a shorter window. That's it. It's two separate thoughts. He never says Superman under performed, he actually calls it along with Minecraft "hits"Superman had like a 81 day theatrical window, that's pretty fucking long, longer than most movies.
Explain to me how this isn't one of the biggest bombs in cinema history>indirectly caused numerous DC movies to bomb beforehand because everyone knew Gunn had rebooted the universe>rumored to have a 360m production + 200m marketing budget, which was later on toned down by WB >massive ad and shilling campaigns all over the world and Internet>Can't put Reeves Batman 2 in production because Gunn wants Batman aswell>Movie releases to extremely forced shill narrative of muh optimistic DC >Extremely mid box office performance, can barely edge out MoS domestically not factoring in increased ticket prices and is a complete flop internationally>Even on /tv/ there are more threads on MoS than this one>all online discourse is still about the Snyder movies>Highlight of the movie is some CGI squirrel being saved because that's somehow important>WB had to fast track the digital release ahead of its original September release to make back some bucks>Supergirl looks DOAHow the fuck is this the hit shills claim it is? It has all but destroyed DC.
>>217789586>Superman had like a 81 day theatrical window, that's pretty fucking longAnd still could not outgross 2013 Man of Steel NOT adjusting for inflation KEEEK
>>217789586>He then goes on to further explain different theatrical windows by comparing Sinners and Superman and says Superman has a shorter window. That's it. It's two separate thoughts.>He never says Superman under performed, he actually calls it along with Minecraft "hits"See this is something I'm surprised nobody on the Senate panel caught, like if they wanted to grill him more why not ask him "hey you said Superman was a hit but then you claimed it had a shorter window and that under-performers have shorter windows. Which is it?". Most of the articles and shills calling Superman 2025 a flop this week, didn't catch that because they didn't watch the video fully
>>217785770i think we should probably revisit his allegations now that the epstein mail is out there
>>217789663>See this is something I'm surprised nobody on the Senate panel caught, like if they wanted to grill him more why not ask him "hey you said Superman was a hit but then you claimed it had a shorter window and that under-performers have shorter windows. Which is it?". Most of the articles and shills calling Superman 2025 a flop this week, didn't catch that because they didn't watch the video fullyBecause if you see the whole thing in context it's not confusing. He is clearly using Sinners and Superman as examples of movies with different windows, and not as an example of a movie's theatrical window being shorted because of a weak performance.There's nothing to call out because nothing contradicts him calling Superman a hit.
>>217788111He could get away with just the comments desu. The most damning thing is being a friend with a convicted pedo on top of the comments.
>>217789741All he was saying in the Congressional Hearing was that the new Gunn movies are underperforming. Further into the hearing he hints that Gunn might be replaced soon, which tracks with Gunn's contract expiring in almost exactly one year from now.
>>217785770Scnider's Superman is for gaylords.Gunn's Superman is for straight men who have regualar sex with women.That's what it all boils down to.In the whole of the Sniderverse there are 2 women who are not complete crones; Lois Lane and Wonder Woman. Wonder Woman is off the table as she is still obsessed with a man who died over half a century ago (and is played by a childkiller, whkch is a bit of a passion killer anyway) and Lois Lane is potrayed as a perimenopausal frump. Batman, who often has a hot girl as part of his cover, or gets to flirt with Catwoman or Poison Ivy, is an incel in the Sniderverse. Iris, who is used as Barry's beard in all other versions of The Flash isn't present in the Sniderverse and although he is a big black man in America, who is both inteligent and good at sportsball, cyborg isn't fucking and women with his robo-dick. The whole thing is a sausage-fest.The Gunn-verse, on the otherhand, has plenty of goodlooking and fuckable women in it. Most are played by or based on his wife, sure, but pleanty of eligible clunge is waiting for your gunge.
>>217785770>>217785770>>217785770>>217785770snyder Bros snyder Bros HOW GOOD IT FEELS to be back !!!!
>>217789741I know but given the way they were heavily grilling him in the rest of the video, I was surprised they didn't jump on that as well
>>217789788You didn't watch the video, did you.
>>217789881They should have asked what his opinion was of the Brendan Frasier and Michael Keaton Batman movie getting deleted for a tax payout.
Netflix fag CEO is using Gunn Superman box office as an excuse to put only 1 week a movie on theaters and then put on Netshit , that's all, because by the time Snidershit Superman was on theaters, it underperformed too, and by that time was not 30 streaming appsGunn Superpuss underperformed because the movie is meh , horrible costume ,a Superman getting his ass kicked the entire film , so fuck Superwoos, and fuck superbitch too, by the way, Gunn Suicide Squad flooped even harder, in part thanks to streaming
>>217787312Why do fags on the left have such a love boner for Gunn if he's an admitted pedo? Either you're incorrect or a pedo has escaped cancellation from the left and is worshiped for making a heckin wholesome superman movie.
>>217785770Gunnxixxies................... the CEO of a different company allegedly said something............... is it over?
>>217789591>Explain to me how this isn't one of the biggest bombs in cinema historyBecause it won
>>217785770>during a high-profile Senate hearing.IMAGINE MAKING SUPERMAN MOVIE SO BAD THAT SENATE SUMMONS YOU TO EXPLAIN YOURSELF HAHAHAHAHAHA
>>217789591>>rumored to have a 360m production + 200m marketing budget, which was later on toned down by WBbecause it's rumorswhy do people take budgets, reported or rumoured or leaked, with a grain of salt? This is the same industry where a 5million dollar budget movie can make 400million at the box office and lose tens of millions of dollars. Where a billion dollar franchises consistently lose money but consistently keep getting sequels and prequels and spin offs. at best budgets don't tell the whole story, at worse they're straight up bullshit. they aren't to be trusted.
>>217785770
>>217789912if you're so smart and have watched it then where is this so called congressional video on superman?
>>217790469https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=447CgcAePm4&t=3017s
>>217785770Why do these freaks use random ai images of them instead of an actual photo.
No Hollywood movie this century that made as much as $350 million domestic failed to make at least $700 million worldwide, that's catastrophically low international turnout
Snyderbros are faggots
>>217791658Only Amerifats were dumb enough to fall for the marketing. The rest of the world is tired of Marvel-like slops.
>>217791658Yeah Trump really fucked this movie's international audiences, good thing it broke even in the US alone and that was enough to BTFO three tentpole MCU movies in 2025, otherwise they wouldn't have greenlighted the fastest sequel since Iron Man 2
>>217791889Trump had nothing to do with the movie being Marvel-like trash that alienated international audiences from the very first trailer. The trackers were all saying there was no buzz at the box office for this movie well before it released and well before Trump made his tweets.
>>217791909Objectively wrong, but it also it should be noted Disney suicided their fantastic flop movie against this movie and Marvel is an extremely brown coded franchise compared to DC, so that must have hurt their sales in brown countries (didn't help F4 either, one of the biggest flops in capeshit history)
>>217791964>Objectively wrongObjectively true, Gunnjeet. All the initial trackers had the movie well below what WB expected. The initial projected numbers were awful. If anything the Trump posts probably gave this turd a slight PR boost.
>>217791987>GunnjeetGotcha, disneysaar
>>217792002I have no idea why you keep resorting to your own falseflag threads all the time. I don't care about Marvel. If anything, Superman is part of the Marvel cancer now.
>>217789591> in cinema historyit is not even the biggest Capeshit flop from 2025 >Captain America: Brave New World, yes the movie underperformed but JL was more expesive and did almost the same box offcie, and yes, people outside the US didn't like it and wanted something more adult maybe.
>>217792038>falseflagTo prove you guys are brown disneyshills seething about Superman being a hit with a super(hehe) fast sequel while the movies you were shilling were brown flops just like you>We have nothing to worry aboutLUL
>>217792094You can dump the rest of your falseflag threads if you want to. I have said what I wanted to say.
OP, you're a retard. Lol.
>>217789601MoS flopped, unlike Superman
>It's another episode of "gay snydertards are having a meltdown 10 years after flopping and being derided"YAWN
>>217789591Snydershit flopped and nobody liked itThat's why Snyder doesn't have a job
>>217785770This entire thread, like all the others like this one, is made by one single snydertard.Just imagine the magnitude of his butthurt
Reminder BvS and Justice League underperformed in the same vein when both failed to gross $1 billion in an era of yearly Marvel billies.
>>217785770Eh maybe it underperformed but it got a sequel so at least it did awright
>>217790136That variety article is retarded and doesn't take into account how much of MoS' budget was covered by product placement: https://www.imdb.com/news/ni55284309/> "Man of Steel" has a budget of about $225 million. And while Warner Bros will likely have no trouble getting that money back from ticket sales, it turns out that it has already recouped almost 3/4 of it. According to AdvertisingAge, "Man of Steel" was able to accumulate over 100 global promotional partners, which resulted in $160 million in product placement.
Epic news we just have to share and send cards and letters to Mr. Sarandos he will listen to public like us go to X right now and post #SarandosSavesSnydeverse p*do gunn deserves to be jail
>>217795533It's not the first time a flop got a sequel. Silent Hill got two sequels. Hellboy also got a sequel, although many deny it's a flop despite the budget being $66 million and only making $99 million at the box office, having to split profits with movie theaters, thus the movie loss money. Point being, flops do get sequels. No guarantees the sequel will make money.
>>217788107>converts audience goodwill into box office>poisons the well for any Superman related media for the next 20 yearsYeah Snyder was a real genius with that one
There were unironic Gunnjeets on this board who were desperate to pretend it didn't flop, they'd argue endlessly. All those unpaid hours shilling for this garbage, pretending it was a success, only for the CEO to admit it flopped anyway. So fucking funny.
>>217797085Pretty much.
>>217797085>only for the CEO to admit it flopped anywayNever happened btw
>>217791889you're right I shouldn't listen to a CEO spending billions and testifying under oath in front of the government to close the deal I should listen to a scriptbot from a Mumbai gig worker. Superman 2025 performed like Titanic on steroids
>gunn gooners btfo>snyder simps still cryingDonner boomers, we keep killing it!
>>217797143You have to wonder how low IQ someone has to be to read this headline and believe it, when the numbers make it literally impossible. Fascinating.
>>217797166>you're rightI know, thanks for your concession>>217797205>jeetcopeSuperman was a hit and got a sequel, Fantastic Flop bombed despite all your jeetshilling. That's the only things that matter
>>217797231The CEO literally said it flopped. You can try to pretend otherwise but you have been unequivocally BTFO. Nobody cares about muh sequels, it means nothing.
>>217797272>The CEO literally said it floppedHe didn't tho, he's not even the CEO of WB lmaoo>Nobody cares about muh sequels, it means nothing.Cope harder jeet
>>217797306>If I keep closing my eyes and ears it didn't happenAbsolutely embarrassing cope. At least admit defeat gracefully. Stop making a fool of yourself.
>>217785770goodhe really fucked uphad no planand just produced cringy millenial/genX humor slopanyways apologize to mr Nerdrotic, Critical Drinker, Mauler, HeelVsBabyFace, Disparu, etc
>>217797143The CEO did admit it on video in congress you dumb fuck. It also loss over $42 million.
>>217797341>>217797367But he actually, 100% didn't say it flopped and he's not even the CEO of the company that made the movie. Listen jeets, I'm sorry about Marvel getting their asses handed to them (or as we say around these parts, they got GUNN'D DOWN). But this is easy to verify
>>217797346it was zoomer lame faggot humour with a boomer dogshit throwback style, the worst of both worlds
>>217797143If you want a laugh, and an insight into the low IQ mind of a Gunnjeet, everyone should read that article. It's hilarious.https://www.slashfilm.com/1963750/superman-box-office-profits-triple-man-of-steel/That don't even understand that studios do not receive 100% of ticket sales.
>>217785876Wow just like Trump
>>217785876Everyone in Hollywood is either a pedophile or friends with one.
>>217788107You know I got worked by you chumps? TNT showed Man of Steel after wrestling so I watched as much as I could before I realized the difference between Gunn's Superman and Snyder's Superman is that Gunn likes Superman and Snyder, like his inspiration John Byrne, turned Superman into what he wanted him to be.
>>217797346>he really fucked upHe should have gone with a more conservative solo superhero mive instead of what he did, some moments are really cringe>had no planHe obviously had a plan and creative freedom to do whatever the fuck he wanted to and failed, it is not only a problem with Superman but also to focus on c listers like Peacemaker or Creature Commandos, Not being able to touch Batman because Reeves, to do a soft reboot to keep his wife's job and lots of other shits.
Wait a second I'm listening to all these senate pedophiles and Bruce Campbell, the WB guy, says they're a profitable studio and they name Superman as one of the reasons why (01:25:00 mark). I'm not hearing anything about floppingThis thread is just vantabrown disneyshill made up cope, isn't it? Because Superchad pissed all over the MCU corpse in 2025? Is that it?
>>217785770I mean it was obvious by numbers alone. I think it's hilarious that the numbers can be public record and when the director/et al. say "No trust us it's okay" people actually believe them. In spite of the numbers blatantly telling a different story. Very bizarre behaviour.
>>217797788>ROUTINELY MOVIES THAT UNDER-PERFORM, THE WINDOW MOVES A LITTLE BIT, AND SUPERMAN WAS A SHORTER WINDOWhttps://youtu.be/447CgcAePm4?t=4313Straight from the horses mouth. Gunnjeets BTFO.
>>217798092>CEO of a different company speculates about streaming release window>CEO of the company who made the movie names it as one of the reasons the studio is profitableDamn Superchad destroying F4 and raping the corpse really did you in, mousejeets. This is the most desperate attempt I've seen in months, ever since you brownies were claiming a movie named MAN OF TOMORROW wasn't going to be a Superman movie. SAD!
>>217798211Thank you for the laugh, anon. Your premium cope has made my day. Gunnjeets are never going to live it down. When Supergirl flops I think we might see mass suicides.
>>217797562No, no. Trump *is* a pedophile. A pedophile who raped children.
>>217797143How can Superman 2025's profits be 3x more than Man of Steel's when both movies cost the same to make and Superman made less at the box office?
>>217798748source: it was real in my dream
>>217798812Trump is a gay pedophile who raped children.
>>217798806Actually Superman 2025's profits were closer to 4x more than Man of Steel when you include the massive amount of sneederfaggot butthurt.
>>217798816take your meds, thanks.
>>217798841He's short circuiting because he can't keep going on about releasing the files anymore
>>217798841>>217798859Trump raped and killed children, then ate their flesh.
>>217798911That's cool, man. Now please take your medicine.
>>217798941I wonder what Trump and his gay lover Epstein did with the dead children's bodies? I mean the parts they didn't eat.
>>217788111WB was just really desperate. They needed someone to take charge of the DCU.Disney brought him back once they realized that Normalfags didn’t care about the pedo allegations.
Time has shown that Man Of Steel, Justice League, and BvS were the peak of superhero movies artistically
>>217799176Even Snyder’s villains were the most iconic of all. Steppenwolf was the most intense villain we've seen on the screen, which is something Marvel wanted to do with Thanos, but Marvel couldn't achieve the perfection that Snyder did when he brought us Steppenwolf.
>NO SAAR SUPERMAN SAAR PLEASE SAAR SAVE ME SAAR I MAKE YOU A CURRY SAAR
>>217797740Gunn turned Superman into Starlord. Never read a comic where Superman cried about mean memes and people trolling him on the internet, calling him shit.
>>217798911>killed children, then ate their flesh.But enough about Hilary
>>217785876every jew is
Gunn's Superman was made for ADHD zoomers who thinks they're too old for Marvel but wanted something edgy but hated Snyder because they're also going through their atheist phase.
