Remember how people 20 years ago would always say movies sucked because studios prioritized money instead of artists and their films never had a “message”?Now studios flush money down the toilet, hire feminist artists to helm billion dollar projects and everything has a progressive message - and all of it is unwatchable low value dogshitLiterally pic rel
Amazing insight
>>217789776This but unironically
>>217789735(((Directors))) and (((producers))) only care about profits. They may put some satanic/masonic shit here and there for lulz, but ultimately it's the audience's fault. They give us what we collectively want to consume. Even if they systematically brainwashed everybody to settle for the most low hanging fruit mediocre entertainment, it's still our fault. They just want to spend as little as possible to make the maximum amount of profits with the most minimal effort
>>217789735>t. 100 IQ
>>217789735Incredibly nuanced and wise thread
>>217789832Please tell us more, JQAnon.
>>217789776Thanks
>>217789832Again, midwit opinion>Let’s spend 1 billion dollars on a tv show that gave us 0 new subscribers!Vs>If I put propaganda in my shows I will get a huge kickback from the money pronters. And when the company goes bankrupt my political friends will hire me somewhere elseThey want personal profit not company profit
>What's that? You don't think every movie made since 1939 should've had a black lead actor? Well what if it's the subtext in a singing animal cartoon?
>>217789889They don't spend whatever they say they spend, anon. It's always fake inflated numbers with jews so retards like you believe they actually put a lot of effort in the production (they didn't)
>>217789832This theory has been obsolete for at least five years now. Yes, entertainment cycles are slow and yes, it takes time for the industry to pivot in response to consumers rejecting the status quo, but hollywood has had at least ten years of consistent failure to learn from and didn’t. If the profit maximising theory was remotely accurate, we would have seen a pivot around 2018 after high profile gender bending/race lifting failures made it obvious IP parasitism could only take a movie so far, and by 2021 we would have seen signs of course correction.Instead they doubled down until their failures were so blatantly obvious they were impacting the propaganda they were spewing. Even now we’re seeing the dregs coming out the pipeline, making it clear they’re so stubborn they’re clinging to the sunk cost fallacy in hopes there will be a miracle reversal.This anon>>217789889Is absolutely correct. This shit does not make sense if one assumes the public are the intended source of profits.
>>217790072Ok Rabbi
>>217790088Thanks for the input bot, but can you generate something better next time?
>>217790095Can you?
>>217790134If you want to larp as a guru who knows the real score, you may want to branch out from the playground when sourcing your comebacks.
>>217790197You need to go back, nigger
>>217789735>Remember how people 20 years ago would always say movies sucked because studios prioritized money instead of artistsThose were the critics and cinephiles. >Now studios flush money down the toilet, hire feminist artists to helm billion dollar projects and everything has a progressive message Yes, in movies for the masses. The masses never complained about that and just consumed dogshit franchises year after year.
>>217789735>Remember how people 20 years ago would always say movies sucked because studios prioritized money instead of artists and their films never had a “message”?I don't remember anyone saying that.
