[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


The most kino of all those pointless "legacy sequels" and its a shame no one saw it
>>
>>217804813
Yeah, it is a pretty good movie. But it's still totally pointless. Unless we treat ruining the ending of the first movie as the point, in which case it still kinda sucks.
>>
>>217804813
Since when does kino mean “5/10 unnecessary sequel to a movie that gets mogged by requiem?”
>>
File: EfXCE01UYAA8csO.jpg (41 KB, 798x644)
41 KB
41 KB JPG
>>217804926
>movie that gets mogged by requiem



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.