[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File deleted.
Cinema as a whole would improve if every movie, no matter the genre, included every single of the following.
>1 full titty on screen at all times. You only need 1.
>1 full frontal vaginal POV shot of a flaccid penis becoming erect.
>An old white man gets called a nigger by a black guy.
>The old white guy responds by saying he's the king of the niggas.
>2 full titties during 1 scene.
>1 ejaculation scene.
These can be random, they can all occur in the same scene, but there are in fact 0 movies which you could call worse if they had all of these scenes in them. Imagine how much more rewatachable a movie like Dog Day Afternoon would be with 1 full titty on screen in every scene. You can't.
>>
>>217805147
You have described pornography
>>
>>217805147
name one time where this has happened. I'll wait
>>
So basically everything should be a Troma film
Sounds good to me
>>
>>217805175
Modern Hollywood doesn't have the balls to make kinografie. In the 80s they'd have made me a millionaire movie man.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.