Antiwhiteism is why movies and shows all suck these days.Prove me wrong. Protip: you can't.
>>217815540Here's a tissue, snowflake.
None of this is true. Chuds live in an alternate reality.
>>217815584It's always funny seeing the insults people choose to use, because they often use insults which devastated them in the past.
>>217815540Reminder that pic related was approved by the Smithsonian.
>>217815648It is true. How else do you explain antiwhite producers White Erasing stories or historical figures by replacing Whites with nonwhites?
>>217815648media is the alternate reality, portraying whites badly in media is proof whites are the best because everything is the opposite in entertainment
>>217815662I mean the Smithsonian wasting tax money on something like this is fucking stupid, but if they didn't waste it on that they'd just give it away to ungrateful foreigners or useless brown people anyway, but besides that what is actually wrong with the image? Those all seem like good things to me. Is there one for basketball americans? It'd be hilarious to see.
>>217815662Not surprsied they used the antiwhite term "whiteness" either.
>>217815696It's not true because it doesn't apply to cinema. The majority of protagonists are still white, white villains go back to silent cinema, so where's the change? The rest is just nonsense made by people who know very little about cinema or Western culture in general.
>>217815540You can read the fucking documents from the Academy and every single major production studio that mandate race/gender quotas and progressives will still insist it doesn't happen.
>>217815722and “judeo-christian” kike nonsense
Also characters not going to church unless they are evil to show the hiopocrisy
>>217815699>but besides that what is actually wrong with the image?You'll have to ask the Smithsonian board. They're the ones who later chose to remove it and distance themselves from it after it was shared too many times online.
>>217815540>Protip: you can't.I literally can't wtf
>>217815739that ugly nigger who can’t act just happened to audition the best :^)
>>217815739Jennifer Esposito just complained on Instagram how Latino roles now mandate actual Latinos and that Italian Americans can't play Latinos, but Latinos can play Italian Americans. Apply this tenfold to black roles.
>>217815722>>217815696>>217815540This webstite doesnt namedrop the jews
>>217815722Americans are its own thing and this picture is about white culture in the United States. It's a very reductionist picture, but American identity is based on skin color rather than the culture of their ancestors.
>>217815835not really, america’s regional differences correspond to different european immigrant waves
>>217815938Yeah, but they are still closer to each other than to blacks. Or at least it was like this until relatively recently.
>>217815540Film is like an alternate reality>White people are criminals>Black people are police officers>Christians are le evil>Libtards are le good
post weight and how many girls you've kissed last year
>>217815540>Children are sexualizedNice try sneaking that in at the end, you cućk. Go watch Starfleet Academy.
>>217816089Honest to god some people live in alternate reality where>people who are sticklers for rules are evil>people who break all the rules are goodwhen it's usually the other way around, as whatever personal rules you have, they will also break those.
>>217816254>you're a cuck because you don't want children sexualized by hollywood creepsHow did that make sense in your mind?
>>217815540is this one of those "one of these does not belong" puzzles? cause the last one is the one that doesn't belong.
>>217815540>Prove me wrong. Protip: you can't.two names. Jesse plemmons and adam driver. aaaaaand you lost the argument. see you next time OP.
>>217815650"woke" is the public facing part of critical race theory, that asserts literally anything people found desirable or was beneficial to society was caused by white supremacy, and is therefore bad
>>217816254>>217816341Undermining white cultural standards and norms is antiwhite, retarded pedophiles.>>217816378"critical race theory" you mean systemic antiwhiteism."white supremacy" that's just an antiwhite slur.
>>217816311They aren't. When it comes to this this is the most puritanical era since maybe the 1950s.
>>217815823You have a low IQ, and you're probably not even White.>>217816424You must be living under a rock, or you're just a bad liar.Tell me, what is the movie "Cuties" celebrated and defended by the entire entertainment industry?Tell me, what is the movie "Sound of Freedom" condemned and hated by the entire entertainment industry?
>>217815540It's because of the domination of franchises for manchildren.
>>217816424>this is the most puritanical era since maybe the 1950s.Meanwhile, in reality:>onlyfans>more porn sites than ever>LGBTs identify as their sexual perversions>sodomite indoctrination in schools>pervert teachers exposing kids to sodomite porn in schoolsAnd that's just off the tip of my mind.
>>217815540White well peeing
>>217816414sure
>>217816523
>>217816473The movie Cuties isn't a Hollywood movie, it's a European movie. >Sound of Freedom Because it's a boring piece of shit TV flick?
>>217815648Found the jew
>>217816512>when it comes to this By 1970s you had 13 years old Jodie Foster playing a prostitute. Now Americans lose their shit over stupid crap like Cuties.
>>217815540Whites will be a minority by 2030
>>217815540So where's the chuddie Überkunst?
>>217815540I mostly agree with those points but NWG is a cult leader.
>>217816600whites have always been a minority
>White man is the villain Like in the majority of movies of every era? >Black man is the hero The majority of heroes are still white, not black. >Gay guy is the voice of reason Gays are still very rare in movies. >Woman has the balls You will find such movies going back to silent era. >Dad is an idiot Same as above, a trope from the silent eraChuds as always prove they know nothing about cinema and out culture.
>>217816552>it's boringThat explains the extremely loud kvetching over its existence.
>>217816712just because kikes have pushed it forever doesn’t mean it’s right
>>217816712See >>217815739
>>217816733Then why are you on this board about movies or television if you hate the medium so much?
>>217816806to insult you and your effeminate interests
>>217816747It's easy to pass these requirements and I think they are only about being nominated for the Oscars.
>>217816876 the main plot has to concern minority intrinsic to pass the requirements
>>217815733defenders like you never argue whether race replacement happens, you argue why you’re not allowed to care.If it were meaningless, you wouldn’t need to explain it away every time it happens.
>>217816712Category flattening. You take existence at any time in film history and pretend it’s the same thing as systematic emphasis and moral framing today. That’s the trick.point by point:>1. “White man villains always existed.”True, as individuals. What’s new isn’t villainy, it’s default moral assignment.>Then: white male villains were specific characters with motives.>Now: “white male” itself is often the explanation. The identity is the sin.That’s a shift from narrative causality ideological shorthand.>2. “Most heroes are still white.”Irrelevant. Counting protagonists misses the point.The change is who is allowed competence, authority, and moral legitimacy.>White male leads are increasingly framed as broken, outdated, compromised, or needing correction.>Nonwhite / female / queer characters are framed as axiomatically right even when poorly written.It’s about moral asymmetry, not screen percentage.>3. “Gays are rare.”Again: wrong metric.The issue isn’t quantity, it’s function.When present, gay characters are disproportionately:>conscience figures>moral arbiters>exposition-deliverers of “the lesson”They’re not just characters, they’re authorial mouthpieces. That’s new.>4. “Strong women always existed.”Yes, Ripley, Sarah Connor, etc.Difference:>Then: strength emerged through ordeal, limits, cost.>Now: strength is asserted by declaration and protected from consequence.That’s not strength; that’s status shielding.>5. “Idiot dad trope is old.”Correct, but scale matters.What was once comedic variety is now near-universal de-legitimization of paternal authority, paired with maternal or institutional replacement.Old trope ≠ dominant moral pattern.The core lie you’re telling:>“If something ever existed before, it can’t be ideological now.”That’s absurd, and obviously an attempt at gaslighting.
>>217817115Now ask AI to post multiple examples of these points.
>>217816975Because even leftists know it's wrong, but they're too cowardly to question the media
>>217817175Examples of the shift (framing, not mere existence):1. White male authority framed as inherently suspect • The Last Jedi – Luke isn’t wrong because of choices; he’s wrong because the myth itself must be retired. Authority = failure. • Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny – Indy is obsolete, sidelined, corrected, and replaced rather than challenged and surpassed.2. Competence transferred without narrative cost • Rings of Power – Galadriel is right by default; male counterparts exist to doubt her and be proven wrong, not to meaningfully contend. • Captain Marvel – Power is asserted, not earned; conflict is internal disbelief, not external limitation.3. Moral asymmetry in ensemble casts • The Witcher (Netflix) – Male characters are impulsive, childish, or cruel; female characters are consistently framed as rational and morally justified even when ruthless. • Wheel of Time – Male channelers are inherently dangerous; female authority is structurally trusted.4. Villainy abstracted into identity or “systems” • Watchmen (HBO) – White male identity is treated as a proximate cause of evil rather than individual ideology or action. • Falcon and the Winter Soldier – The antagonistic force is framed around legacy guilt rather than concrete personal motives.5. “Strong woman” without ordeal • Compare Aliens (Ripley) or Terminator 2 (Sarah Connor)vs.She-Hulk – strength is declarative, consequence-free, and meta-protected.6. Fathers consistently delegitimized • Ant-Man, Thor: Love and Thunder, The Incredibles 2, LightyearPattern: paternal authority is comedic, absent, or corrected by institutions or maternal figures.7. Gay/queer characters as moral arbiters • The Last of Us (HBO) – Queer characters framed as emotional truth-holders whose perspective is never meaningfully challenged. • Sex Education – Queer characters function as ethical compasses, not flawed participants.
>>217817247I don't watch TV shows. >Luke isn’t wrong because of choicesBut he is. >authority = failure Like Jedi in the prequels? Like Obi Wan and Yoda?
>>217817386You’re playing dumb by flattening context. Here’s the clean distinction you’re pretending not to see:>Luke wasn’t “wrong” in the OT because of choicesLuke Skywalker in Return of the Jedi:>acts decisively>risks himself to save others>wins by refusing the Dark Side without surrendering agency>authority is earned through actionFailure exists, but it produces growth and triumph.Luke in The Last Jedi is wrong by premise>pre-emptive moral collapse (“the Jedi should end”)>abandons responsibility before trying>guilt replaces action>authority is framed as inherently corruptHe doesn’t fail forward, he withdraws.>“Authority = failure” is NOT the Prequels’ thesisThe Star Wars Prequel Trilogy:>show institutions becoming complacent>criticize bureaucracy, not competence>still valorize mastery, discipline, and sacrificeObi-Wan Kenobi and Yoda don’t renounce their roles, they train, fight, and prepare the next generation.That’s accountability, not abdication.The real difference (the part you’re dodging)>OT/Prequels: failure responsibility action>TLJ: failure self-loathing withdrawalOne treats authority as a burden to carry.The other treats authority as a moral sin.Final nailIf Luke had been written in 1983 the way he’s written in 2017, the trilogy ends with:>“Sorry guys, I thought about it and being a hero is actually bad.”That’s not depth.That’s ideological sabotage wearing nostalgia.You knows this. You’re just hoping i won’t say it plainly.
>>217817386luke is pedo coded in TLJ and just sorta dies doing nothing, it’s hard to imagine a worse portrayal, like they must’ve spent weeks workshopping how to avoid giving luke a single positive moment
>3 centuries portraying women and minorities as evil, barbaric, stupid, subhuman, expendable, inferior, killable, ugly, despicable>that's fine>1 decade of portraying white males as bad (deserved)>THIS IS A TIMMY JENOCYDE !!so tiresome
>>217817599>3 centuriesYou mean over 100 years ago? Then 100 years of the latter.
>>217817628For example this is from over 100 years ago and is the white people equivalent of Sinners
>>217817599You’re arguing with a cartoon you invented.No one is mad that “white men can be villains now.” Villains existed forever.The complaint is about systematic patterning, not individual characters.You collapse centuries of unrelated media into one moral blob, then pretend a very recent, very specific industry shift is just “karma.” That’s not analysis, it’s accounting fraud.What changed isn’t that bad things happen to white male characters.What changed is:>legacy heroes get ritually inverted>failure and incompetence are demographically consistent>marketing, awards, and press openly frame this as moral correction>dissent is pathologized instead of answeredCalling every objection “genocide panic” is just a way to dodge those facts.If this were really just “stories,” you wouldn’t need HR language, quota documents, sensitivity readers, or thinkpieces warning about “who you’ll be sitting next to in theaters.”You don’t win the argument by pretending patterns don’t exist.You win it by explaining why those patterns are good, and you never do.
>>217817668Leftists are too low IQ for pattern recognition, they think whatever the media tells them to think
>>217816473Jews have always been dis-proportionally the biggest advocates for all this woke crap, it's clearly a part of their culture that should be critiqued
>>217815650Seriously. Leftists have been seething about being called snowflakes for like 15 years.
>>217817966jews critique you but critiquing them is a hate crime
>>217815699>what is actually wrong with the imageWhen they say things like "abolish Whiteness" this is the sort of thing they're talking about. Is there a single thing on that list that you want to go away?
>>217817455>That’s accountability, not abdication.>Failed I have. Into exile, I must goAnd that was before he knew about Vader's children.
>>217818052>self-reliance >"You get what you deserve"Yall will preach this while at the same time calling for White unity and seething at boomers for selling off "your" inheritance>Children should have own room, be independentEncouraged generations to buy larger houses than they could afford, then get stuck with an empty nest, then have to downsize.>Judeo-Christian traditionSay no more>Respect authorityShould say "Respect legitimate authority">Progress is always bestLord have mercy, need I say more?>Win at all costsI think this is a little Judeo creeping into our Christian values, LOL. The most celebrated moments in sport are when somebody puts the game aside and shows mercy toward a rival who is hurting. Something Whites do near exclusively, and really too much and too often in realms where actual loss and gain are at play.>Avoid conflict, intimacy>Don't show emotion>Don't discuss personal life>Be politeOf course a black's understanding of these principles will differ from our own, but we really do need to be willing to break rules and make exceptions when higher morality demands it.Yeah I can criticize it around the edges, but for all the opposite reasons that a non-White would LOL. And I agree with it overall.
>>217815650
>the the hero
kek im marathoning fallen (1998) and im almost finished. the only thing on that list it checks is black man is the hero. i guess MAYBE you could add white woman is hero but she isnt really doing much except consulting/advising black hero
>children are sexualizedHollywood has been doing this less and less since the 70s though.
>>21781802090% of the responses they throw are shit that was thrown at them. That's why they misuse so many of the terms. they think the buzzwords are just default retorts and terms don't have specific meanings.
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/527920316
