Have you guys tried asking AI for recs?Just tell them the movies and tv shows you like and ask for recs.It's good to tell the AI movies and tv shows you don't like as well.
>>217999830Do not redeem
>>217999844I really mean it.You just have to correct it, otherwise you'll say you like art movies and get A24.
>>217999830
>>217999830Ffs I’ve got a soft spot for Claude from watching the little retard try and complete Pokémon, it’s over for me bros
Why is AI so bad at specific movie dialogue? It should be extremely easy but if you ask ChatGPT something like "what is the dialog in Bad Lieutenant when he pulls over the two girls" it's always completely wrong?
>>218000187What am I looking at?
>>217999830No, because I'm not a brainless Jeet (even if you're white, relying on AI makes you an honourary Jeet). There are mountains of recommendation lists written by actual people. I mean fuck, people were making rec lists before the internet existed. Go read a fucking book.
>>217999830LLMs are trained on reddit, IMDb, etc. If you want basic bitch recs, sure go ahead. I haven't tried this on movies but tried this on music and it's fucking terrible.
>>217999830I already have one generating movie ideas
>>218000364Finding full scripts online is pretty hard. Its just googling shit for you
>>217999830Yes, it sucks a fat dick. I'm very much pro AI, but Chat gpt gives cookie-cutter answers. Or ignore sone prompts all tigetherI was interested in indian and balinesean movies with interesting visuals, because their deities are visually striking, bit AI gave me nothing.Then I asked for forgotten movies such as baroon of muchasen, movies with great visuals, yet again, just shit answers.
>have you tried talking to the Ai yet, like actually speaking to it. the movie "Her" is already here.
In a moment of weakness last night I used chatgpt to help job hunt. I've been a manager at a movie theater for 13 years but the new boss is just so fucking dreadful I can't take it anymore I can't take it anymore
>>218001829because it's trained on redditGIGO
>>218000553>Okay, how about this: Adam Sandler... starts an "Ask the AI!" company but he answers the questions... falls in love with a customer, a blonde white girl with blue eyes... but the day they suppose to meet he looks in the bathroom mirror and sees an Indian man... which means "she" got there first and found out his secret!
>>217999830No because I don't need reddit poisoned opinions in my movie recc's.
>>218002546We'll call it "Do Not Redeem"
>>218003118I don't know if it has been said before but virtual insanity is what we're livin' in
>>218003221It's all following scifi tropes and scenarios really.Eventually most of the energy will be used to facilitate virtual environments.We're going to work up to a dyson sphere just so we can goon forever.
>>218003377There's nothin' left to do but pray
>>217999830The biggest wall for most people is still resource hogging. It would have more appeal if these AIs were coded to be lightweight enough to run on old PCs
>>218003118
>>218003713AAAAAAANNND its banned
>>218003704You're not reading the situation correctly.The end game is that ALL the processing on any computing device whatsoever is going to be server side. People will just own basically gutted terminals and processing will not be local. You will pay for a subscription service to access all that, in perpetuity.To facilitate that all the resources are hogged by the providers of these services and it makes absolute sense that they want to squeeze the consumer market until you have no option but to go through them.Most "enthusiasts" and younger people are already fully onboarded and it will just continue.
>>218003704NASA wants to try and use an LLM to make navigation decisions for Mars rovers. I guess tell it points of interests and it'll make decisions. The delay between the planets gets quite large and waiting a half an hour for an update while navigating small rocks is kind of a waste... Considering the kind of hardware they use on those things it would necessarily be pretty lightweight and with the cost of an error being 1 billion+ it would be safe to assume we will see relatively lightweight AI coming along
>>218003759Not if money is to be made.Bear in mind that the porn industry didn't even get into this at all. This is all just in it's starting stages.Once all the owners of the porn companies get into this you're gonna see some real shit.
>>217999830>ask grok to rec me a show based on another show i liked.>it gives me a short list of shows.>input same question into google.>google returns a reddit thread as the first link.>the comments in said reddit thread list all of the movies grok recommended.why don't i ask ai for recommendations? because it's just like talking to a freeze frame of random redditors from the past, albeit somewhat abstracted so that you can pretend that's not what you're doing.
>>218003118>steady increase with no real exponential spikes
>>218003881>steady increaseThat is quite literally an exponential curve.
>>218003824You can extrapolate the rest of space exploration from that simply leap.Once it clicks "why do we even need humans to go there" the next logical step is to make it all automated.Why send humans to Mars AT ALL. You can simply send robots and AIs to mine and create rudimentary industry and manufacturing there with no human presence whatsoever.Maybe down the line you can create a habitat for "tourists" but that's it.And to continue with that line of reasoning exploring other stars and so on can also be done by sending automated probes with AIs on board that can possibly gestate humans out of organic matter on arrival.Sending a living crew anywhere is complicated for a number of reasons, sending inorganic stuff and robotics is comparably much, much easier.
>>218000495>There are mountains of recommendation lists written by actual people. I mean fuck, people were making rec lists before the internet existed. Go read a fucking bookThese books have been uploaded to AI.
>>217999830Nuke India
>>218000535>LLMs are trained on reddit, IMDb, etc. If you want basic bitch recs, sure go ahead. I haven't tried this on movies but tried this on music and it's fucking terribleWhat AI are you using?You can tell AI to ignore certain sites.I tell AI to get me recs from /film/ general, RYM, certain critics, blogs and so on
>>218000581>Finding full scripts online is pretty hard. Its just googling shit for youJust get the subtitles on subtitles.orgBut the real reason ChatGPT doesn't do it is copyright. It's the worst one regarding this.
>>217999830No.
>>218001829>Chat gptThat's the problem.Use Claude, Gemini or Deepseek.
>>218003985Before we get anywhere close to there we’ll realize picre is infinitely more rewarding
>>218004710the "people" that want that can have it and die in it. the rest of us are going to colonize the universe.
>>218004833>the rest of us are going to colonize the universe.you will find civilization after civilization living inside their computers.
In the future we'll have full-animated movies done by hand and supersonic commercial flight and pneumatic tube systems everywhere and airships and rockets that can propel humans beyond low earth orbit and starlite plastic
>>218005736which can only happen if those people somehow pass on their genes
>>218000490Who do you think recs you stuff when you are a loyal slopservice supporter, saar?
>>218004223The training data, not the prompt-time searches
>>217999830tried that last week with jeetpeetee.it took hours to short list just a few half decent ones I hadn't seen, and it interspersed some truly awful zero budget meme films that must have come directly from a plebbit "films that acherly deserve to be noticed" that have never seen the inside of a cinema.found it was faster just to search the archives of here for recommendations, had a far bigger list in a fraction of the time.
>>218003985I'd like to go to mars to escape from the hordes that have invaded the west
>>218004278gemini is a retard.
>>218003118This isn't even remotely trueWhy do leftists lie all of the time?Also the vast majority of data centers are not AI data centers
>>218003798>The end game is that ALL the processing on any computing device whatsoever is going to be server side. People will just own basically gutted terminals and processing will not be local. You will pay for a subscription service to access all that, in perpetuity.Kill yourself you bad faith schizophrenic retard
>>218004198Gas Luddites
>>218006365he's right and large tech companies have already made statements that this is their intended future.are you a bot or just fucking cretinous
>>218006604>he's right and large tech companies have already made statements that this is their intended futureThey haven'tImagine being this brainwashed by clickbait youtube videos that you don't actually look into these things yourself.You take one out of context quote and make an insane conspiracy about itIt would be fucking IMPOSSIBLE for them to do this due to competition anyway.Kill yourself you misinformation spreading schizophrenic retard.Stop making society retarded
>>218006680You sound like a frog being boiled alive as the temperature rises and you pretend everything is fine.>impossible due to competitionYou're so naive it's painful.
>>218000535I've tried it with retro videogames and got similarly awful results
No because presumably it just scrapes the same online forums/sites asking for recommendations to X which eventually boil down to "thing that was released around the same time frame and trust me bro person of interest is totally like burn notice bro"
>>218006851>scrapes the sameIncorrect, they scrape EVERYTHING. Some guy posted a while back that his unadvertised personal site got hit by an AI scrape bot like a thousand times so they have these scrapers go through everything online over and over and over. You just have to be more specific with your questions. If you ask broadly you'll get a rather generic answer that's for normies, the more you specify the more it'll dig through its database.
>>218006774>You sound like a frog being boiled aliveYou sound like a manchild that thinks he is in a movie.Why don't you grow up and actually investigate these things yourself instead of taking twitter/youtube/pol/ clickbait at face value?>naiveIt's literally already happening. New plants in china are ramping up production of DDR5.The big 3 ram manufacturers are also ramping up production with prices expected to fall in less than 2 years.Ram shortages have existed in the past yet the price always inevitably managed to continue to drop more and more over the past 50 years.Even if these 3 companies decided to form a cartel, that would just create a massive profit opportunity for a new company to enter the market, sell to consumers cheaply and make billions.Also the AI bubble will pop by then anyway.You're a child and you people have been wrong for 200 years
>>218003798>>218006604Don't you already own a computer?Is big tech going to magically thanos snap your computer or something?What are you even complaining about?
>>218006988Yeah you're right computers last forever. I haven't bought a new computer since 1989
>>218006927You're latching onto the flavor of the week news and ignoring macro trends, which is why you're a dimwit that deserves to be fleeced. Actually, you're the kind of person that will sign over his soul and be first in line to do so while talking shit online at the same time.
>>218006913>dig through its databaselol, lmao even
>>218007047Modern computers can already basically do anything and lady a really long fucking time.>>218007073>and ignoring macro trends,The problem is you see a temporarily spike in prices(which is purely the result of the government's money printing/malinvestment) and you think this local tens will continue forever.Read a history book.Bubbles don't last foreverAI Isn't that profitable>you're the kind of person that will sign over his soul and be first in line to do so while talking shit online at the same time.Meds now
I did for books after giving it my Goodreads listWorked pretty good
>>217999830About 15 years ago Netflix had a recommendation system that asked you a series of questions and gave you really on point recommendations. It didn't seem to last despite how good it was, the system was retired for much worse ones and I don't know if Netflix still even has a recommend system but I imagine it'll be some shitty llm if they did.
good morning sirs :)
>>218007175>tensTrend
>>218003450pray for what
>>218007218I think it's time I found a new religion
>>218000155so basically ai is still wrong about everything. thanks got it.
>>217999830>ai trained by reddit data then fagged up some more by liberals I genuinely rather ask tv for recs instead, theres a good chance the answer will come from some live at home schizo virgin but it at least has a chance of being interesting
>>217999830They're super bad for recs.
>>217999830>please feed our AI your personal tastes so we have additional data with which we can more precisely subvert youno, i don't think i will
AI makes you stupid
>>218000490trakt is great
>ask AI for recs>it's the same thing I already get from a normal search except worded like a redditor wrote it$1 trillion well spent.
>>218007186because only the back catalog would get views
>>218000364There is no such thing as AI. That's an LLM. ChatGPT predicts words in a sentence. It just makes up stuff based on the data it was trained on.ChatGPT is the worst one. If you ask what the Joker's catcphrase was in Dark Knight it will go>''Why''>what's a good word that goes after why?>''did''>what do people usually say after the word did?>"you''And it just completely makes up a fake quote. It only gets things right if it has been corrected or the LLM is just really good at predicting it.LLMs like Gemini don't do that. If you ask gemini, it pulls up all the relevant data and googles shit until it has an answer and then it has several steps that it goes through to check if the answer is right.
