[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
02/24/26(Tue)22:28:16 No.218196012
File: file.png (452 KB, 2257x1311)
452 KB
452 KB PNG
Anonymous 02/24/26(Tue)22:28:16 No.218196012 Archived
Despite coming out 10 years after the second installment, Now you see me 3 did very well at the box office, with a revenue split skewing more international than most other movies with similar levels of success.

My question is why? Why did this movie not flop like 99% of other cash grab legacy sequels. The first two didn't really have a cult status or much enduring power. I suppose they are rewatchable at least.

Is it literally just because of Jeets thinking shitty "magic is cool"?
>>
Anonymous
02/24/26(Tue)22:32:11 No.218196071
Anonymous 02/24/26(Tue)22:32:11 No.218196071
>>218196012
The Chinese fucking loved it
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.