>>218206388
>A strange game. The only winning move is to blow everything to shit.
>How about a nice game of chess?

>>218206388
Maybe you should remove Israel from these simulations?

>>218206388
It has one example of nukes being used in a war, and they worked.

>>218206388
LLMs aren't intelligent and have ant-like thinking patterns disguised under human-like mimicked prose.

>>218206388
Let them play tic-tac-toe

>>218206388
Nuclear weapons are doctrinally just the natural conclusion of strategic destruction like the carpet bombing of ww2. In a leer war between world powers it’s the natural conclusion. That’s why there hasn’t been a peer war between great powers though as it has been thus far correctly assessed as not worth it since it’s virtually impossible to escape mutual destruction.

It’s actually why missile interception technology is far more dangerous than nukes themselves because it could give a government the idea it could be worth while to strike themselves first believing rightfully or wrongfully they could escape retaliation.

But regardless, from the perspective of “a war is happening” the ai is logical in using nukes because it’s not being asked if a war is worth fighting, it’s asking how to win, no matter the cost, and if that’s the case, you are at a disadvantage not using them.

>>218206388
You'll never guess how many times humans used nuclear weapons in all those RAND corp war games and scenarios