>2026>The only good King Arthur adaptations are Excalibur from the 80s and Merlin from the 90sHow?
>>218217351Because that's when soul still existed
>he hasnt watched the camelot musical from the 60s
When a story is so old and iconic it's kind of seeped into the cultural osmosis and doing a straight adaption is a bit boring. Saint George and the Dragon for example. A hero knight goes and saves the princess and slays the dragon. It's a super old mythological story, probably derived from Greco-Roman myths and re-used by Christians. Would a straight adaption be interesting? We've seen it time and time again. Guess what Super Mario is at its core? It's a retelling of Saint George. You have to do something unique or interesting. King Arthur? There's a bit of that in Star Wars with the Jedi and light sabers and such. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_George_and_the_Dragon
>>218217351Read Jack Whytes Pendragon series.
but pic related is good and from the 60s
>>218217351>How?Because the world is so brown now that nobody even has a frame of reference for Arthurian legends or knows what they are