[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_8558.jpg (60 KB, 670x1000)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
>sequels better than the original
>>
>>218229248
point of the bait?
>>
File: ghostbusters2016.jpg (153 KB, 932x481)
153 KB
153 KB JPG
>>218229248
>>
File: s-l1200.jpg (266 KB, 776x1200)
266 KB
266 KB JPG
It's crazy how shit this is
I went in with an open mind since I often like "bad" sequels and it was directed by Boorman who made arguably one of the best movies of all time so I thought I'd find something at least halfway decent

No
It's really really fucking bad
>>
>>218229248
who are you quoting?
>>
>>218229577
He also directed Zardoz while on a metric ton of drugs.
>>
>>218229577
It's crazy how much of a brainlet you are
>>
>>218229248
It's deffo weigh overhated, but butter? No, mang idaind.
>>
It's definitely better in one way.
>>
>bait threads better than the original
>>
File: 1766629736637902m.jpg (58 KB, 1024x579)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
>>218229279
It's not bait. Plenty of critics agree the sequel to Exorcist is superior. Friedkin BTFO



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.