Art can never truly be art within corporate spheres. No good film will ever be made by a non-independent studio as there will always be limitations placed on creative minds. Art will cease to exist in the latter half of the 21st century as it becomes impossible for independent thought free from the constraints of governments/lobbies/religious groups/ect to exist. The creative observer will die.
This sounds like something RedLetterMedia said
art can't be art ever because humans seek status the same way they seek capital
>frognigger with the low IQ takesSome of the greatest art in modern times literally came form advertising and not from pseudo starving artist fags.AI will replace the current system and people are tech savvy and creative will prosper and those who lack will be left behind. Shrimple as.
>>218241123People in the past have made great things on low budgets.The only limitation is your creativity and willingness to look stupid
>>218241163good morning
>>218241165It’s got nothing to do with budgets when the government execute you for making movies without corporate lisence number 30373737>>218241163Kill yourself Jeets. Only Jeets, tech(fag)bros and Kikes like ai.
>>218241163an even better point than your faggy take: the greatest art in history have been exorbitantly expensive commissions by elite patrons, not garbage churned out by cheap peasants. "some" won't cut it
>>218241192True. Retards forget all the classic pro white shit they praise literally came from the pockets of the elites and Catholic Church. We all know fake and gay films are the ones by no name people who just push out slop because of woke shit or it needs to fill airtime. But films are getting so expensive that the patrons are really backing out. Even people like Snyder and Nolan have trouble getting something produced. So we're stuck with mid level shit like Marvel movies or the latest remake steering Jack Black. Its a pain. I get that Indies sometimes make good films but it's more rare than people might want to admit and even then those small little indie films always end up having Sony or Warner or some big company distributing them.
>AI will
I don't get it.
>>218241405>chinks stealing tech IP from AI companies>AI "stealing" artists' work by scraping for data for image generation>artist "stealing" by drawing feet porn of a licensed IP without permissiondoesn't really make sense as sonic is not a public domain character, could have used robin hood or dracula or something. Maybe an attempt at irony - the asian guy is accused of stealing when ultimately the original IP came from an asian guy (Sega). Which just makes it racist since Sega is a Japanese company and the guy on the left is clearly chinese CCP. The fact that they made the asians bart simpson colored and slant eyed is more evidence of this
>>218241405painter's coat
Every time I hear about some movie where >omg the director went crazy with his own vision and ran out of money and got abandoned by the studio but it's a lost ambitious masterpieceI put it on and it's boring dogshit and all over the place with a couple of pretty cool scenes and visuals which people always post when shilling the movie because they're the only good things about it.
>>218241123>corporate spheresImagine a girlboss in a Hillary Clinton pantsuit, inflating rapidly until she becomes a massive corporate sphere.
>>218241755I liked Megalopolis
