the chudcel smirk

That’s actually a pretty common thing throughout history

Manosphere shite doesn’t fuck around, my nephew and cousin were normal kids in middle school and now pretty much legitimate racists

>>218274192
fair. (verification not required)

Why does 4chan insist boys end up this way because the left told them things when it's really the right telling them the left is telling them things.

>>218274369
No it seems to be a common consensus, im not watching it simply because I’m not interested in a story about a school shooter or whatever this is

Who gets to decide whats right and wrong? Society? Please.

File: elliot.jpg (7 KB, 296x170)

7 KB JPG

>>218274192
Gee, where have I heard this unlikely premise before?

>>218274280
idk how that relates to manosphere it’s just kind of natural once you start actually interacting with different races and notice the stereotypes were accurate

>>218274369
>>218274391
I live in bongland but wasnt born here, and the only people interested in this are older fat women with a victim complex, and probably gay niggers. I had to explain to my mothers friend ( who has mixed race kids, told me that whites should pay restitution for slavery despite her black crack smoking husband who is a second gen immigrant ands not a slave descendent, who she pushed out of their house then he just died of a heart attack a few months later, and the mixed race kids are so xanaxed out of their minds they are labeled as autistic instead of just drug fucked ) that this shit is just crappy propaganda akin to war shows from the 90's meant to emotionally push you into a certain thought pattern. Anyways I'm just done with this gay shit, we have decades of old media to consume. Neglect all this garbage and let it rot and fester. Schizo out

>>218274192
me own horse a computer with tourettes

>>218274192
>i am upset at this fake scenario made up in a tv show involving no real human persons
Funny how there was a story of a negro child stabbing little girls to death at their ballerina class to be actually mad at, but that's not as interesting as this fake incel kid we made up on TV for money

>>218274502
With the amount of mudslimes specifically targeting children at parks and playgrounds when they have gone on a tirade of stabbing sprees these past few years alone. The '''producers''' know full well what they are doing and any attention off their backs is good

>>218274192
Adolescence is satanic panic catnip for the mumsnet crowd in the UK who are a huge voting block, and is obviously being pushed for an agenda of censorship.
That being said I think kids shouldn't have access to smartphones, period. Make it a purchase that requires ID. Not because the internet is turning young men into murdering incels, but because it's turning every kid into unsocialised/radicalised ADHD fuckwad. Or just ban smartphone social media entirely. Access to the internet should be through a desktop 95% of the time desu.

I just skipped right to murder lol

>>218274747
Agreed, dumb phones for those under the age of 21. And perhaps something akin to a drivers test so less whores and annoyances in general have quick and easy access to the web

File: 1768676887172024.jpg (197 KB, 832x1248)

197 KB JPG

Only one girl can save us now.

>>218274192
Good, if i can't have them just kill them

>>218274192
This is based on a true story and in reality, the kid was black

>>218274811
Not allowing cameras built into cellphones would organically curtail a lot of behaviors over time

>>218274868
Photos only, no videos. And a system ( like film from old cameras ) that requires some kind of financial sacrifice ( some kind of disposable memory card ) so that if they want to take photos of their fucking food and vacations just to flex, they have to pay again and again for little to no attention outside of their schools and family.

>>218274192
>gets rejected by a girl once
It's just getting rejected once; it's growing up in a feminised system that demonises, belittles, and has no understanding of men.

>>218274935
If you want to take photos buy an actual camera howbout. Compulsively saving every moment made moments less special

>>218274747
Agreed. Same thing we do with alcohol.
Some parents will still give their children smartphones, but it is what it is.
This is a much better idea than trying to age-verify the entire internet.
The only reason they are approaching it from this angle is that they want citizens to dox themselves so they can crack down on free speech.

>>218274990
Hence the reason I suggested the idea of disposable one use memory cards. Read what's written on the fucking screen...

>>218275086
Having a separate device is actually important

>>218275104
Explain your reasoning

>>218275177
Economy of space. Inventory management. Single task focus. Etc. Important things. If you can just switch to a camera at any time on your phone it doesn’t change anything. People will be willing to incur financial burden to mindlessly snap photos of things they should be experiencing. Not having the option because you simply didn’t bring your camera with you is a good thing.

>>218275228
No, seeing as people didn't didn't have this problem with disposable film that needs developing 30 years ago. Also the fact that minors tend not to have money.... did you not think about this anon? I care about annoying faggots shitting up the internet with their garbage, not the spiritual wellness of minimalism. You a Shinto priest perchance?

>>218274192
Me own son. Me own bloddy son. Me own flesh and blodd like, roight? Me and the missus made the lad wivv a roight ‘ol batch ‘a shagging, yeh? A good few gos at the ol’ rumpy pumpy. I can’t remember which toime I spaffed it made him, cos truff be told, we were goin’ at it all weekend like, tryen’ fer a new wee baby. Gosh that were a hell of a weekend. We had to change the sheets when we were dun.

BUTT. I didn’t make the little shite fer him ter be a FOCKING ray-ess-ist! I seen him watching podcast of the BLODDY LOTUS EATERS after school on his BLODDY LAPTOP! Wivv bloddy Carl wots-his-name, you know, Sargon of Akkad! That absolute maniac doesn’t want equal racial representation in video games! IT MAKES ME BLODD BOIL!

I asked him iffen he would ever want to play as a black woman in one of his bloody play station comp-utah games. Butt he said nah, and he showed me his minecraft character. White as a FOKKING GHOST! Said he liked pretending it were actually IM in the minecraft! SICKO STUFF, DON’T E KNOW OR KIND DON’T BELONG NO-BLODDY-WHERE?

I wuz gonna get him something traditionally English to eat fer dinner as a treat. You know. Maybe a chippy or a chinese. BUTT, now I know he don’t deserve it, the smirking little gobshite!

So no officers, he can’t have stabbed that girl (she was white though, so I wish e’ did). Because I ‘ave ‘im strapped to me ol’ torture rack, down in the bloddy basement.

>>218274369
4chan is full of incels exactly like him.

>>218275593
and you are one of them

>>218275683
You're projecting.

File: welsh.png (278 KB, 381x825)

278 KB PNG

>>218274192
majority of cases the boy has a ex girlfriend, and usually shades of black or brown

>>218275593
its based on a true story.....about a nonwhite
thats why they race swapped it, so you can be allowed to go against it
in real life the brits suppressed all protest and went "dats dey culcha, innit?"

>>218275701
By stating a fact? You said 4chan is full of incels and you are on 4chan, therefor you are one of them.

>>218274280
> Manosphere shite doesn’t fuck around, my nephew and cousin were normal kids in middle school and now pretty much legitimate racists
Good. Might keep them from being knifed by some school diversity as they learn not to relax.
>>218274306
>when it's really the right telling them the left is telling them things
Who do you think you can fool, honestly? We swim in this fucking propaganda all day and once you see it you can't unsee it.

>>218274747
in a corrupt, Epsteinite system, everything the government does ultimately serves malicious ends.

Yes, you should control what kids are exposed to on the internet but zog-Western governments are obviously just using this as an excuse to get their foot in the door to take away even more political rights from their adult citizens in the future. If they had any genuine concern for children, first and foremost, they wouldn't be importing populations from cultures where child brides are common or that commit sexual assault at 40 times the rate of the native inhabitants.

why is murder such serious business now?

i know that sounds ridiculous but looks at Murder, She Wrote compared to these GRITTY, PSYCHO DRAMAS.

teenagers kill each other. there are crimes of passion. someone on your street has killed or been killed.

>>218275758
I didn't say every user is an incel, illiterate-kun.

>>218275794
Are you actually retarded? British TV is full of normal comfy murder dramas. It is a staple of TV.

>>218274192
Incels are indeed dangerous and should be neutered at a very young age.

>>218274192
This is how we do things in Poland, but instead of the girl, we take it on our defenseless grandma instead.

>>218275593
Maybe on /r9k/. The rest is normalfaggot central. More than half of the posters here are offsite redditors with wives/gfs.

>>218274192
well the actual crime it was based on was perpetrated by mudslime, so it tracks. They didn't put that part in the show though.

File: 1770482932606377.webm (4 MB, 1280x532)

4 MB WEBM

>gets thrown into jail for non-violent crimes once
>immediately resorts to fucking murder and butt-smugling drugs
huh?

>>218275818
what's left? the only one i know is still going is Silent Witness (which was already annoying and modern, all the horrible blue tinting and 'snappy' editing).

>>218274817
>me fookin' son...jerkin' his sausage to guberment propaganda cartoons???

>>218275844
I'm not even talking about /r9k/. It's the whole site.

>>218275794
>>218275818
Mores change over time. You had a lot of gritty psychodrama in noir, but moral policing made the movies tone it down and kept it off TV. By the 80s you could have a show like Mike Hammer be successful on TV (based on the Spillane noir novels thought to be brutish and glorifying violence). The 90s started to have serious psychological shows like Cracker which tried to take a realistic look at murderers and their psychology.
If anything the CSI crime boom led the other direction toward more spectacle and nonsense. Overall there's much more gore than you could ever have put on TV before, Bones in particular had gruesome shit every other episode. Hannibal had to censor buttcheeks on primetime by adding more gore.
> Murder, She Wrote compared to these
Comfy murder shows never really went away. Like other anon said the brits have been squeezing these out regularly for half a century. But even the US makes some, that Poker Face show is like a revival of Columbo tropes. The big problem has been that they're not as successful in the US so that kind of explains the whole problem. UK audience loves comfy murders. US wants gore and melodrama. Scandinavians have realistic and depressing murder drama with alcoholic police people that are divorcing.

>>218275875
>what's left?
For comfy murder dramas?
>Midsomer Murders
>Death in Paradise
>Father Brown
>Sister Boniface Mysteries
Stuff like that. On Netflix you had Thursday Murder Club which seemed more comfy murder drama.

>Silent Witness
That always presented itself as more gritty and I thought the issue anon was having was that everything is TOO gritty and not comfy like Murder She Wrote.

>>218275884
>UK audience loves comfy murders. US wants gore and melodrama. Scandinavians have realistic and depressing murder drama with alcoholic police people that are divorcing.
The UK has plenty of comfy murder shows. But then the UK has plenty of more gritty down to earth ones. But then some UK shows inspired some of the Scandi dramas which in turn inspired some of the more modern UK shows too like Broadchurch.

>>218274502
I was going to refute this but y’know what? You won’t listen to me. People have been pointing out this shit for years and somehow it’s failed to penetrate Baizuo skulls. Have fun in the world you’ve created, I hope you get H1B’d.

>>218275884
Poker face in columbo WITHOUT the comfy stuff, it has the girl on the run from murderers the entire time.

>>218274502
People on social media create this rumour that originally the show was about a black boy but changed to white because:
>Netflix
The situation you're talking about was never the basis of this show. But then this Netflix meme/joke got wrapped up in boomer Facebook slop, people like Elon Musk commented about it and it became:
>OMG Netflix changed it from a black boy to a white boy and it was based on that specific case!
It was never based on the Southport attack.

>>218276080
Does it matter? I don’t think anyone would be shocked to hear the British love portraying little white boys as evil.

>>218276080
Then why do British libtards literally call the miniseries a documentary? They thought this shit perfectly reflected real life.

>>218276080
retard.
the actor playing the dad mentioned that very case of the nigger stabbing the girl in london during an interview saying it was one of the reasons they made the show.
fucking spastics in here.

>>218275826
Without incels we’d all still be amoeba

>>218276095
>Does it matter?
It is completely wrong and used to push an agenda.

>>218276098
>documentary
>They thought this shit perfectly reflected real life.
Certain parts of the show (like him being processed in the police station, or stuff like the situation in the school) quite accurately portrayed real life because of the research that went into the writing so some people said it was quasi documentary like. But then the PM and some others talking about it accidentally called it a documentary, making a pretty simple error, which led to people on the internet doing an "actuallllly" gotcha thinking they were being retarded and not making a simple error in wording.

>>218276124
> Graham is setting the record straight. “They’ve completely got it wrong,” he tells THR about Musk’s butting in. “Because if they were to look at their facts, they would see that the horrific thing that happened in Southport happened after we finished our [show]. It just doesn’t make sense. So they’re using this to pursue their own agenda. I understand the whole concept of freedom of speech, I get it, and I see what they’re saying. But I think there’s a fine line between freedom of speech and hate.”
You're completely wrong, he said the opposite.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-features/adolescence-interview-stephen-graham-owen-cooper-netflix-1236182905/

>>218276124
>>218276098
Baizuo dominate Western debate because they live in a totally unique world where everything they believe is right and everything you believe is wrong.

>>218276159
>It is completely wrong and used to push an agenda
The fact you can say this with a straight face invalidates everything else you said. You don’t even see the agenda everyone else here does.

>>218276192
Anon, the show is absolutely pushing an agenda, I am simply saying that the narrative around the Southport attack was factually incorrect and pushing a different agenda. There is a difference. Simply pointing out that one thing is wrong seems to confuse you too much. It is not my fault you can't follow things and that you jump to conclusions.

>>218275800
You're in denial.

>>218276260
Alright then, show me something I've said that would make me an incel.

>>218276254
its not based on the southport attack you stupid fucking bong, its based off of some nigger murdering a girl for rejecting his flowers.

>>218276378
>Alright then, show me something I've said that would make me an incel.
>4chan is full of incels
Anything else?

>>218276254
This is pilpul

>>218274369
I also don't really want to watch it. In my expirience, whenever they try to take an internet phenomenon into a tv show/movie, they always get it wrong.
Incels are not a cult or a secret society, they're a social phenomenon of idiots that don't get laid because they can't (usually because of a lack of social skills)

>>218276399
Where in that post is it said or implied that I'm one of them?

>>218274192
Uhh Based?

File: h.jpg (47 KB, 1611x906)

47 KB JPG

>>218276378
>its not based on the southport attack you stupid fucking bong,
That was my literal point you fucking retard.
>its based off of some nigger murdering a girl for rejecting his flowers.
It is based off of MULTIPLE cases you nonce.

>Graham describes his and Thorne’s collaboration as a Frankenstein-esque task. “I had a skeleton, he gave it a spirit and a body. Then everybody else injected the soul.” This early version skeleton for Graham was inspired by the stabbings of two young girls in the U.K., one of them in his hometown of Liverpool. “They hurt my heart,” he says. “I thought, ‘What’s happening today with young boys?’ Because they are boys. These are not men who are committing these kinds of acts.”
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-features/adolescence-interview-stephen-graham-owen-cooper-netflix-1236182905/

The main murder it was based on happened in Liverpool and was Ava White:
>Ava White: Boy who killed girl, 12, in Snapchat row gets life
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-62119537

>Teen who killed Ava White named for first time
>Harry Gilbertson
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdx5v9y9ryko
Pic related.

>>218276441
Do you not understand the meaning of the word full?

>>218276483
No, its based off of the nigger murdering another nigger who rejected his flowers. Return to reddit faggot :)

>>218276484
"Full" does not mean "literally everyone, including me." You are projecting because you are an incel. When I made that post you immediately thought I must be talking about you.

Maybe he should have looksmaxxed ?

>>218276507
That case didn't happen in Liverpool, you absolute retarded faggot. You can't read. You're behaving like a nigger.

>>218276536
Get back to me when you understand the meaning of the word full, incel. Until then, ease up on the projecting and... you're concession is accepted. :)

>>218276552
I do understand, incel. Stop projecting your problems onto others.

>>218276544
Yet thats what it is based on, pipe down bong nigger and know your place before you get another verbal back hand ya baby head lookin bitch ass nigga.

>>218276565
>Stop projecting your problems onto others.
>4chan is full of incels exactly like him.
I already accepted you're concession. :)

>>218276585
There was no concession and you have given no evidence that I'm an incel, whereas I have given evidence that you are one.

>>218276602
And what evidence would that be, person whos concession I accepted posts ago.

>>218276566
>trying this hard
Embarassing

>>218276665
You thought I was talking about you, even though I wasn't referring to anyone in particular.

>>218275762
We swim in it only because you people post it to push peoples' buttons.

>>218276695
>You thought I was talking about you
By pointing out your blatant hypocrisy? Perhaps english is your second language, but I think the meaning of the word full is something you might have trouble grasping. You're concession is still very much accepted. :)

>>218276721
Regardless your still a tool, just like the people you are against. Same coin, different side.

>>218276777
There was no hypocrisy, and unlike you I understand how to use "full." You got tilted because you thought I was talking about you. There was no concession and you can't prove there was.

>>218276159
>But then the PM and some others talking about it accidentally called it a documentary, making a pretty simple error, which led to people on the internet doing an "actuallllly" gotcha thinking they were being retarded and not making a simple error in wording.
They used this series as a justification for policy plans. Seems like more than just a "simple error in wording". Seems more like a blatant misunderstanding, one accurately reflected by the words they chose to use.

>>218276802
>You got tilted
Projection
The proof is in you seething in denial about being an incel. Concession accepted S. tier edition. ;)

>>218276885
No, you're the one projecting. You scrambled to defend yourself even though nobody was talking to you. You have zero proof that I'm an incel or that I conceded the argument.

>>218276842
>They used this series as a justification for policy plans.
They CLAIMED they would, it became one of those media buzz things.
>Seems like more than just a "simple error in wording".
I specifically mean the word documentary was used in error, which it was.
>Seems more like a blatant misunderstanding, one accurately reflected by the words they chose to use.
Two things can happen at once, firstly it did become a silly flash in the pan moment of people in politics and the media saying "we've got to learn the lessons of this drama" as well as people who hadn't watched it talking about it and not using correct language or making mistakes.

File: meownson.png (3.04 MB, 1830x1876)

3.04 MB PNG

>Me own son, a chud.

>>218276922
>zero proof
Ironic.
The proof is in how hard you are seething about the mere thought of being a 4chan incel.
>nobody was talking to you.
And you debate like a women. XD
Concession is still in acceptance.

>>218276973
It's not ironic. I have proof that you're an incel, you have no proof for your claims.

>The proof is in how hard you are seething about the mere thought of being a 4chan incel.
You started seething because I made a remark about incels that wasn't directed at you in any way. I'm merely defending myself against unwarranted aggression and false accusations.

>And you debate like a women.
No I don't. The fact that nobody was talking to you is a relevant fact.

>Concession is still in acceptance.
You can't show any proof that this happened.

>>218276931
I don't understand you point. It wasn't a misspeak. What they were saying regarding the movie only makes sense if they genuinely believed it was a documentary or at least reflected some sort of real phenomena. There hasn't been a single instance of murder in the whole recorded history of the UK that fits the profile presented in the show. There's not an epidemic of boys radicalized into committing violence by the manosphere. The fact it was even floated as an idea that e.g. boys in school should be shown this series in anti-missoginy classes is insanely misandrist. Imagine if in the US some film makers made up a show of a black boy killing a while person, and now the US law-makers were saying that black boys should have anti-white racism classes in school where they are shown that series. It would be rightfully seen as insane and racist. But because it's the UK, one of the most gynocentric countries in the world, and it's propagating misandry, one of the least acknowledged or cared about forms of bigotry, nobody gives a fuck. It made me sick.

>>218275794
A lot of it is how the media maniulates perceptions, specifically of what a "murderer" looks like. That's easier to control than controlling how the public feels about murder. Deciding which mugshots to publicise is the simplest form of it. This case is particularly eyebrow raising because one of the mugshots of all time is intended to be overshadowed by a smirking white child from a fictional tv show.

How people feel about murder varies from bracket to bracket, because of varying degrees of awareness and narrative conditioning changes their perception of it as a phenomenon in the society in which they live.
A separate question with more interesting avenues to explore is what has changed with the perception of value of human life. It could be attributed to metaphysical attitudes, but also people having fewer children later and expecting to live reliably to old age.

>>218277001
>you have no proof for your claims.
>illiterate-kun.
> I made a remark about incels that wasn't directed at you in any way
I Pointed out the irony of
>4chan is full of incels exactly like him.
>No I don't. The fact that nobody was talking to you is a relevant fact.
and
>I'm merely defending myself against unwarranted aggression and false accusations.
Yes, you do debate like a women.
>You can't show any proof that this happened.
Refer to the first quote here, incel-kun.

>>218277001
>>218277034
>>218277065
is this the samefag?

>>218277113
no?

>>218277095
>illiterate-kun.
What about it?

>I Pointed out the irony of
What irony?

>Yes, you do debate like a women.
I debate like any rational person would.

>Refer to the first quote here, incel-kun.
You are the incel here. You are projecting. You can't take responsibility for your problems so you try to force them onto others.

>>218277113
No.

>>218277113
Last one isn't part of this argument. IDK the timeline but the discourse after the release aggregates all of certain kinds of violence (an "epidemic"...) into this imagery and narrative, regardless of how true to life it may or may not be with regards to particular instances which may or may not have been direct inspirations.

>>218277135
>What about it?
Typing like a weeb = incel
>What irony?
Claiming that 4chan is full of incels, whilst posting on 4chan. You do understand the meaning of the word irony, dont you person whos concession was accepted a while ago.
>You are the incel here. You are projecting. You can't take responsibility
Once again, ironic

>>218277135
>>218277175
post screen cap and prove it

>>218277215
>Typing like a weeb = incel
I didn't type like a weeb, and even if I did it wouldn't make me an incel.

>Claiming that 4chan is full of incels, whilst posting on 4chan.
I never said every single person on 4cha is an incel, as I already told you.

>You do understand the meaning of the word irony, dont you person whos concession was accepted a while ago.
You can't show any evidence that any concession occured.

>Once again, ironic
No it isn't.

>>218277034
>I don't understand you point. It wasn't a misspeak
The misspeak I was talking about was specifically the PM Keir Starmer. Now him misspeaking did get rolled into the general argument that the reaction to Adolescence was hysterical. I absolutely believe the reaction to the show was hysterical media posturing. I am simply saying in that instance, it was a misspeak. Some OTHER people called it documentary-like because of the single shot approach and the strength of some of the moments (like the police processing) and how this was accurate to real life. I'm sure some retards on Reddit acted as though it was like a documentary because of the hysteria or whatever. I was simply trying to say there is a difference between these different people and groups.
>The fact it was even floated as an idea that e.g. boys in school should be shown this series in anti-missoginy classes is insanely misandrist.
People watch various things in school to teach them different things. I don't think it is that bad. I think the real problem with the hysteria was people acted as though there was an epidemic of violence when stabbing mostly effects men as both victims and perpetrators.

>>218277281
>I didn't type like a weeb
Kun at the end of a sentence = typing like a weeb, and yes it makes you an incel.
>I never said every single person on 4cha is an incel, as I already told you.
You struggle with the meaning of the word " full " still?
>No it isn't.
Yes, it is when an incel cant take responsibility for not understanding the meaning of the word full. Do you not own a dictionary or are you illiterate?

>>218276159
>>218276483
>>218276931
>>218277135
samefag

>>218277358
That doesn't make me a weeb, and being a weeb doesn't make someone an incel.

>You struggle with the meaning of the word " full " still?
That would be you. Saying that something is full of something doesn't necessarily mean literally everything. When James says in Silent Hill 2 that "this town is full of monsters" he is not referring to himself and every other human in the town.

>Yes, it is when an incel cant take responsibility for not understanding the meaning of the word full. Do you not own a dictionary or are you illiterate?
You are projecting again, incel.

>>218277378
Take your pills.

>>218274192

>pussy (or the lack of it) causes man to do crazy things

Many such cases

>>218277331
>People watch various things in school to teach them different things.
What are they supposed to learn from this purely fictional show? That engaging with the Andrew Tates of the world can push them into misogynistic violence? But that's a lie, is it not? There's no precedent for it. It's a purely manufactured narrative that has no reflection in the real world. The idea boys should be forced into dehumanizing anti-misogyny classes just because of something that's completely fake is insane to me. Is there not enough messaging in the western world targeting boys to force it into their heads that they're evil? This messaging wouldn't fly, if it was any other group being targeted with such vile hatred by the fucking government.

>>218277393
>being a weeb doesn't make someone an incel.
Holy cope, yes you are a weeb incel XD
>Saying that something is full of something doesn't necessarily mean literally everything
When in actuality, it does. Why don't you quote the meaning of the word full then and prove me wrong?
>You are projecting again, incel.
Ironic seeing as you dodge responsibility for misuses of grammar.
Post a photo of you having any kind of sexual intercourse, and prove me wrong incel. You're Concession is accepted. :-)

>>218277393
work on not having reddit lengths of text incel

File: dance_bobby.gif (469 KB, 350x500)

469 KB GIF

>>218275701
>4chan is friggin full of heckin incels
>like you?
>UHHHH I DONT COUNT, OKAY??? I JUST POST HERE SOMETIMES SO I DON'T ACTUALLY COUNT AS ONE OF THEM, OKAY????

>>218274502
the show was already deep in production when the lil nog stabbed the girl
there's just no way it could have influenced it considering when the show was aired
like, you may have had a point if netflix had delayed it 6-12 months but the timeline just doesn't add up

>>218277458
I'm not a weeb or an incel, and even if I were a weeb it wouldn't make me an incel.

>When in actuality, it does.
No it doesn't. Again, in Silet Hill 2 James is not referring to himself or the other humans in the town. That's a completetely normal usage of the word. If someone says "this town is full of drug dealers" he doesn't mean literally everyone in the town is a drug dealer.

>Ironic seeing as you dodge responsibility for misuses of grammar.
I didn't misuse grammar, you did. And you're the one refusing to take responsibility for being an incel, instead attempting to force the problem on someone else.

>Post a photo of you having any kind of sexual intercourse, and prove me wrong incel.
This is a completely absurd standard of evidence, and since you're the one making the accusation the burden of proof is obviously on you. Also, such a photo wouldn't even prove that someone is not an incel.

>You're Concession is accepted. :-)
You've yet to provide any evidence that a concession ever occured.

>>218277478
Work on having a brain capable of processing more than a few words at a time. Do you think reddit also invented books?

>>218277503
I never said or implied anywhere that I'm an incel. He's the one who started defending himself when I was just speaking about incels in general, without saying anything about him in particular.

>>218275701
>>218276274
>>218277001
>>218277393
see
>>218277503

>>218277576
See >>218277567

>>218276690
Getting proven wrong hurts, doesn't it?

>>218274280
It's always been a thing where kids become racist in junior high or high school. Manosphere just deprograms them from the liberal cope brainwashing. IE muh slavery, muh socieconomic factors, muh systemic racism. If they weren't retarded they'd come to the same conclusions on their own.

>>218274606
Muslims throw acid on women's faces when they get rejected thoughbeit.

>>218277591
Anon, you've posted zero proof and constant bait m8.

>>218277411
How is it dehumanising? It is simply an exploration of themes. It isn't saying people are evil, it is saying that certain attitudes are wrong. There is a precedent for domestic violence in the country. And certain attitudes can lead to that. You're being too sensitive and acting like it is violence and not just something to have a conversation about in a show.

>What are they supposed to learn from this purely fictional show?
Better ban all English literature class because it is all fiction ain't it. Can't learn nothing from it.

>>218277567
>even if I were a weeb it wouldn't make me an incel.
You are and it does.
> I didn't misuse grammar, you did.
Another chance to prove me wrong, where did i misuse grammar?
> instead attempting to force the problem on someone else.
like with saying
>4chan is full of incels exactly like him.
and
>I'm not even talking about /r9k/. It's the whole site.
You in fact claim its the whole site, therefor you mean everyone.
> This is a completely absurd standard of evidence, and since you're the one making the accusation the burden of proof is obviously on you. Also, such a photo wouldn't even prove that someone is not an incel.
So you are in fact, an incel. You refuse to provide evidence proving you are not one. This isnt court, burden of proof lies on the first retards baseless claims. The retard being you, incel.
>You've yet to provide any evidence that a concession ever occured.
I think this anon >>218277503
is proof enough that people have found holes in your women like logic, hence the reason why you concession was accepted over an hour ago, incel.
>I never said or implied anywhere that I'm an incel.
You did, by claiming the site is full of incels. And seeing as you are part of that fullness, you would therefor also be an incel.
>started defending himself
I merely pointed out the irony in your statement, and am enjoying the spastic retorts. Incel weeb-kun

>>218277668
>>218277640
>>218277567
samefaggot

>>218277706
I'm not and it doesn't. Burden of proof is on you to prove otherwise.

>Another chance to prove me wrong, where did i misuse grammar?
You don't understand how to use "full."

>like with saying
No, because I'm not an incel. You are, though.

>You in fact claim its the whole site, therefor you mean everyone.
No I don't. If someone says "his room was full of Star Wars merchandise," do they mean literally the entire room, from floor to ceiling, was absolutely filled with Star Wars merchandise? No.

When I said it's not /r9k/ but the whole site, I obviously meant the problem is not isolated to /r9k/ but encompasses the site as a whole. Even /r9k/ is not 100% incels.

>So you are in fact, an incel. You refuse to provide evidence proving you are not one.
Burden of proof is on you to prove I am one.

>This isnt court, burden of proof lies on the first retards baseless claims.
You accused me of being an incel first.

>I think this anon >>218277503
>is proof enough that people have found holes in your women like logic
I easily refuted his post, and I'm simply arguing like any rational person would.

>hence the reason why you concession was accepted over an hour ago, incel.
There was no concession anywhere, incel. You have no proof to the contrary.

>You did, by claiming the site is full of incels. And seeing as you are part of that fullness, you would therefor also be an incel.
That's not what I meant by full, incel. Also, since this is your stance, you are necessarily calling yourself an incel. Since, according to you, LITERALLY EVERYONE here is an incel, then you must be one too.

>I merely pointed out the irony in your statement, and am enjoying the spastic retorts. Incel weeb-kun
There was no irony and I'm neither a weeb nor an incel.

>>218277721
Take your pills.

>me own son
>a discord gooner

>>218277668
>How is it dehumanising?
It's dehumanzing, because for the past decades feminists have been forcing this view on men, particularly boys, that they are inherently evil and must overcome that evilness by groveling and being permissive to women. To step down, diminish their own place, and forego their own needs and desires in the society in order to make space for women and their interests. So when you have large movements pushing back against this idea in order for men to be proud of who they are and to be able to advocate for their own interests and desires, it's suddenly identified by the fucking government as a pathology that needs to be rooted out via indoctrination. They say: no, boys. You must have anti-misogyny classes, because you just can't be trusted to be a good person, as you're just so inherently evil, and those movements that exist to push back against that notion will lead you to murder women! This completely fictional show you are now forced to watch says so! I just don't understand how you can look at that and not see that as insane. Let me ask you this, would you be in favor of black children (and only black children) being shown completely fictional shows in anti-racism classes of made up scenarios of black children murdering white people? Judging by what you said, making a fuss about that would be unreasonable and claiming it's dehumanizing would be crazy and oversensitive, right? I want to see if you're consistent on this. Or maybe there's something against discrimination against men that makes it okay in your book.

>>218277763
>I'm not and it doesn't. Burden of proof is on you to prove otherwise.
Yet you claim not to be an incel, and a " no you " type response when a proposal to post actual proof comes into play, you deflect. Thus insuring you are indeed a weeb incel.
>No, because I'm not an incel. You are, though.
Yet I didn't claim the site is filled with incels, you did.
> No I don't. If someone says "his room was full of Star Wars merchandise," do they mean literally the entire room, from floor to ceiling, was absolutely filled with Star Wars merchandise? No.
Post the meaning of the word full, and prove me wrong. You can't because you know you are in fact wrong, and an incel.
> Burden of proof is on you to prove I am one.
If you are an incel and have never had any kind of sexual interaction, then that burden is on you. You cant prove it with any kind of image or video, because there are none. And likely never will be any :'(
> You accused me of being an incel first
No, I pointed out the ironic hypocrisy in your claims and have enjoyed you spazzing out for well over an hour now.
> I easily refuted his post, and I'm simply arguing like any rational person would.
No, he simply pointed out the logical fallacy you had when you claimed the site is filled with incels, excluding you of course. XD
> There was no concession anywhere, incel. You have no proof to the contrary.
Then post evidence of you having a sexual encounter with a women and prove me wrong, incel.
>That's not what I meant by full, incel. Also, since this is your stance, you are necessarily calling yourself an incel. Since, according to you, LITERALLY EVERYONE here is an incel, then you must be one too.
Pure irony, Im willing to prove im not with a simple phot. After you of course, little incel.
>There was no irony and I'm neither a weeb nor an incel.
Do you not understand the irony behind saying the site is filled with incels, then claiming not to be one?
>nta but are you also on medication? That would make sense.

>>218274192
It's true....

>>218278018
Burden of proof is on you to prove your claim that I'm a incel. So far you've provided no proof. I'm also not a weeb.

>Yet I didn't claim the site is filled with incels, you did.
What about it? How does that prove I'm an incel?

>Post the meaning of the word full, and prove me wrong. You can't because you know you are in fact wrong, and an incel.
I'm not wrong, incel. I'm accurately describing how the word is normally used in conversation.

>If you are an incel and have never had any kind of sexual interaction, then that burden is on you.
No, the burden will always be on you. You accused me of being an incel. You have to prove it.

>No, I pointed out the ironic hypocrisy in your claims and have enjoyed you spazzing out for well over an hour now.
You accused me of being an incel. I still haven't committed any hypocrisy. You're the one who's been spazzing out.

>No, he simply pointed out the logical fallacy you had when you claimed the site is filled with incels, excluding you of course. XD
There was no fallacy.

>Then post evidence of you having a sexual encounter with a women and prove me wrong, incel.
Burden of proof is on you, incel. You're also demonstrating right now that you don't even know what incel means. Hint: it's not a synonym for virgin.

>Pure irony, Im willing to prove im not with a simple phot. After you of course, little incel.
Burden of proof is on you, and by your own logic you are an incel. If you say that isn't your logic, then you're conceding that I didn't use "full" the way you claim I did.

>Do you not understand the irony behind saying the site is filled with incels, then claiming not to be one?
There is no irony, as already explained.

>>218274437
I had my soon to be 12 year old Niece living with me for a bit and holy fuck, they hate they hate rainbow bullshit being stuffed down their throat from teachers. Some kids embrace it, some rebel same as always but at least in her school (mostly white) more were calling it out which really frazzled the millenial teachers.

>>218277953
Schools already show a range of stuff on various topics to discuss things. You're making a mountain out of a molehill and taking it as a personal insult whilst being really sensitive over it. It isn't discrimination to teach people about various topics. Your advocating for men doesn't seem to be about actually encouraging men to do things and improving their lives, your advocating involves you feeling personally offended by everything and you're acting as though other people, particularly women, have it all, when they really don't. The stupid thing about modern society is the problems caused by accelerationism (changing face of society, technology, economics) have fucked up everyones lives to a massive degree. But rather than face these topics and challenge them, you go, wahhh we're being discriminated against, women bad, because someone wants to talk about the themes of a show? Do you complain about other fictional works being taught at school since you clearly feel they have no value? Better not teach them the works of Shakespeare, that has men murdering people too. What a misandrist he was.

>>218278099
> Burden of proof is on you to prove your claim that I'm a incel. So far you've provided no proof. I'm also not a weeb.
You are both a weeb and an incel, post proof or concession accepted.
> What about it? How does that prove I'm an incel?
Because you are using the site also, hence the irony you retard. Are you a bot?
>Post the meaning of the word full, and prove me wrong. You can't because you know you are in fact wrong, and an incel.
Goalpost shifting, and this isnt a conversation its a debate. Post the meaning of the word, or concession accepted.
>No, the burden will always be on you. You accused me of being an incel. You have to prove it.
After you, incel.
>You accused me of being an incel. I still haven't committed any hypocrisy. You're the one who's been spazzing out.
Except for the hypocrisy of claiming the site is full of incels except for you. Weeb-kun incel spaz parrot.
>There was no fallacy.
yes, there is by claiming the site is full of incels and excluding yourself. Look up the meaning of the word irony, incel.
>Burden of proof is on you, incel. You're also demonstrating right now that you don't even know what incel means. Hint: it's not a synonym for virgin.
Yet you're both a virgin and an incel, ironically enough.
>Burden of proof is on you, and by your own logic you are an incel. If you say that isn't your logic, then you're conceding that I didn't use "full" the way you claim I did.
Still waiting on that proof, incel.
>There is no irony, as already explained.
Are you genuinely retarded or just a bot, weeb-kun incel.

>>218278147
You completely dodged my question about forcing black children to take anti-racism classes and being shown fictional shows about black children murdering white people. I will ask you for the second time: would that be okay in your book? Judging by what you said, you must be, right? And people claiming it's dehumanizing would just be oversensitive, correct? You are engaging in obscurantism by not engaging with what was actually being proposed by the UK government: actual anti-misoginy classes where school boys would be shown this fictional show about a completely made up scenario of a boy being radicalized by the manosphere to murder a girl. An anti-misoginy class isn't an English class where the students just analyze texts like the ones by Shakespeare. It's a specific class made to teach boys to not be misogynist. It's not a case of schools "just teaching different things". My specific point is that what they wanted to teach was morally reprehensible and indefensible. I need you to acknowledge and engage with that instead of trying to be slippery.

>>218278188
Burden of proof is on you.

>Because you are using the site also
So?

>Goalpost shifting, and this isnt a conversation its a debate. Post the meaning of the word, or concession accepted.
No goalposts were shifted. You can look it up yourself in a dictionary. Feel free to provide evidence that the usage examples I've provided so far are invalid.

>After you, incel.
Burden of proof is on you, incel.

>Except for the hypocrisy of claiming the site is full of incels except for you. Weeb-kun incel spaz parrot.
There was no hypocrisy. I'm not a weeb or incel and burden of proof is on you to prove otherwise.

>yes, there is by claiming the site is full of incels and excluding yourself.
There is nothing fallacious about that.

>Look up the meaning of the word irony, incel.
This is actually ironic because you yourself don't grasp the meaning of words, incel.

>Yet you're both a virgin and an incel, ironically enough.
Burden of proof is on you.

>Still waiting on that proof, incel.
Burden of proof is on you.

>Are you genuinely retarded or just a bot, weeb-kun incel.
I'm not any of those things. Burden of proof remains on you regardless of what you post here or how long you spend doing it. This is how things work in white societies.

>>218278261
> Burden of proof is on you.
This isnt court, you are a weeb incel.
> So?
The post you made is ironic.
> No goalposts were shifted. You can look it up yourself in a dictionary. Feel free to provide evidence that the usage examples I've provided so far are invalid.
Yet another " no you "
> There was no hypocrisy. I'm not a weeb or incel and burden of proof is on you to prove otherwise.
There is, and you are.
> There is nothing fallacious about that.
But there is irony in the statement
>This is actually ironic because you yourself don't grasp the meaning of words, incel.
Yet you exclude yourself, incel. Ironic
>Burden of proof is on you.
Concession accepted
>Burden of proof is on you.
Concession accepted
>I'm not any of those things. Burden of proof remains on you regardless of what you post here or how long you spend doing it. This is how things work in white societies.
For someone who isn't white that's ironic.... wait, is that why you don't want to post a video that doesn't exist? I might find out your actually a nigger?
Your concession is accepted, incel-kun

>>218278336
Burden of proof is on you, and you have no proof for any of your accusations.

>The post you made is ironic.
How?

>Yet another " no you "
No it wasn't.

>There is, and you are.
Again, you have no proof for any of your accusations.

>But there is irony in the statement
How?

>Yet you exclude yourself, incel. Ironic
What is ironic about excluding myself from a statement? Do you think any statement made about other people, or people in general, necessarily must apply to the speaker? And are you holding yourself to that same standard, or are you perhaps... excluding yourself?

>Concession accepted
That's not a concession, that's me pointing out the fact that the burden of proof is on you.

>For someone who isn't white that's ironic....
I am white, though. But I can see that you are not, since you immediately moved to accusing me of not being white. That's projection again.

>Your concession is accepted, incel-kun
There was no concession, incel.

>>218278422
>are you holding yourself to that same standard
Ironic.
> since you immediately moved to accusing me of not being white. That's projection again.
Burden of proof is on you to prove im not white

Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun

>>218278460
What is ironic? That I'm asking you if you're holding yourself to that standard? How is that ironic? Could it be that you don't know what irony is? We actually have a word for that.

>Burden of proof is on you to prove im not white
I just did.

>Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun
I never made any concession and you have no proof to the contrary. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218278507
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun

>>218278543
There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

By the way the word I was referring to is "ironic." It's ironic that you don't know what ironic means.

>>218278564
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. Have sex

File: 1746767316525394.png (113 KB, 396x385)

113 KB PNG

Crazy how believing in milquetoast manosphere rhetoric makes society seethe so much. They've been ramping up the anti-incel rhetoric to distract from the failures of feminism and the establishment

>>218278662
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. Have sex ( but not with your dads husband this time )

>>218278774
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218274192
If you don't want to get murdered then don't lead a guy on. Pretty simple stuff.

>>218278804
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218278830
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218278895
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218278895
Member when I said you argue like a women and you denied it XD

I havent watched this since it came out, but from what i remember this whole show seemed to be more about how social media is turning everyone into a nasty rotten piece of shit. All the kids in this were phone addicted brats

>>218278907
There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218278917
I denied it because it's not true in any capacity. I argue like any rational person would. Maybe you're just irrational. On an unrelated note, women are often stereotyped as irrational.

>>218278934
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. And women love to get the last say, like you. And no, you got humiliated and multiple other anons picked up on it like>>218277503

>>218279024
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218279047
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218279073
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218279104
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218279124
There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218279124
>>218279104
>>218279086
>>218279073
>>218279052
anon did you just make this thread and are spamming it yourself now

>>218279133
No.

>>218279131
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218274280
>legitimate racists
Are they actually racist or are they just White kids who make racist jokes sometimes and don't actively hate themselves and their heritage? I'm thinking it's probably the latter

>>218274427
Elliot wasn't rejected. He never tried to talk to girls, but expected them to approach him. For some reason that made him mad.

>>218279169
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218279181
>>218279170
>>218279160
>>218279024
>hours of spam
>the moment spam is called out "organic" posting continues
Bait used to be stronger than this

>>218279220
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218279229
I haven't spammed anywhere or posted any bait.

>>218279242
There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218279264
You are literally spamming with the other anon right now. Why lie?

>>218279264
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218279229
I'm the first anon you tagged. Why did you include me?

>>218279284
I’m one of the real spammers and you didn’t even notice or call out my posts. I’m winning.

>>218279284
Every thread has some weird pointless argument. Bot?

>>218279307
what spams are yours kek

>>218279310
>>218279307
>>218279306
>>218279304
I win incel faggot, have sex :)

>>218279350
You've already been proven to be an incel and you also volunteered that you've had sex with your dad's husband.

>>218279364
have sex :)

File: 1637687777348.jpg (29 KB, 512x422)

29 KB JPG

>>218279350
ok

>>218279375
Like you had sex with your dad's husband? No thanks.

>>218279376
>>218279364
it's just me and you in the thread faggot, no need to pretend. Sex might cure you of being a weeb incel though

>>218279398
have sex :)

File: 1760846527137200m.jpg (48 KB, 1024x743)

48 KB JPG

>>218279404
I just came in late to his party and got caught in the crossfire of an argument. I mean no ill will towards anyone. I am this anon: >>218279376
>>218279304
>>218279181

>>218279445
have sex :)

>>218279455
No.

>>218279481
have sex :)

>>218279496
No.

>>218279499
kek did your friend cop his 3 day ban already XD

>>218279499
>>218279481
>>218279445
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

No Hoe is worth ruining your life there are millions of vaginas in the world

>>218279552
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218279570
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218279600
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218279624
You argue like a women, fighting for the last say. I'm the bigger man who has sex unlike you, and other anons ridiculed you. I win :)

>>218279640
I argue like any rational person would, and I'm simply defending myself. If you claim to be so unconcerned about having the last word then feel free to leave.

>I'm the bigger man who has sex unlike you, and other anons ridiculed you. I win :)
Sex with your dad's husband. No anon here has managed to refute anything I've said or prove any of their accusations against me.

>>218279664
> No anon here has managed to refute anything I've said or prove any of their accusations against me.
Other than the fact that 4chan is filled with incels, therefore meaning you are one. Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218279743
"Full" refers to being completely filled to capacity, containing the maximum amount, or being whole and lacking nothing.
I win :) Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218279792
No, they dont parrot tranny. I win :)

>>218279798
Yes they do. And now you're a tranny as well? Tell me, do you think admitting to being a non-white tranny in a gay pseudo-incestuous relationship is some kind of flex on 4chan? On reddit it would be, but this isn't reddit.

File: 1634267206542.png (267 KB, 609x781)

267 KB PNG

>this entire debate
no wonder this thread remains on page 1

>>218279818
I win :)

>>218279798
You're still not getting laid or invited to parties

>>218279820
it's rather clear whos arguing in bad faith.

>>218279822
How? By losing the argument and admitting to being a gay non-white tranny?

>>218279825
I win :)

>>218279847
I win :)

>>218274192
The main problem is that you have to be evil to atract women.
Some guys completly lost themselves. It's not worth it.
Be a good person and give a fuck to the rest of the world.

>>218279860
Ok, why don't you humor everyone by explaining exactly how you think you did that.

If you actually watch the program it's;
>gets rejected by girl
>moves on
>she decides to harass and bully him
>he confronts her
>she hits him first
>he defends himself
Bitch got what was coming to her.

File: 1653211837862.png (197 KB, 900x722)

197 KB PNG

>>218279833
I'm sorry, I didn't read much of the reply chain. Just wanted to mention how awestruck I am at the attrition of those two(?) anons.

>>218279869
saar

>>218279873
I win :)

>>218279879
>>218277503

>>218279884
If you've won then it should be easy for you to demonstrate it. What's the problem?

>>218279898
I win :)

>>218274192
This seemed like fear mongering from the government & humble bragging from foids that the mere prospect of them turning down a man makes him become a knife wielding maniac cutting throats while screaming bloody murder

>triggereded by Netflix flavor of the week
remember when 4chan used to be funny

>>218279906
If you don't explain how you've supposedly won, then you concede the argument and admit that I was right about everything.

>>218279893
I suppose that post you've tagged is ground zero for this entire argument, yeah? Might read later once the thread's archived.

>>218279919
I win :)

230 posts in and nobody mentions the show isn't about the kid being an incel but rather internet culture convincing a normal kid that he is an incel

>>218279929
Alright then. You concede the argument and you admit that I was right about everything.

>>218279944
I win :)

File: croydon.gif (1.07 MB, 440x248)

1.07 MB GIF

>>218279935
The show is about illegal niggers mass stabbing native british and communist government coordinating with Netflix corporation to put revisionist propaganda in schools.

Isn't it interesting how there literally isn't even one instance of the crime this show is about actually happening in Bongland?

>>218279944
Great, now that your egos been checked. You claimed 4chans filled with incels. Therefor you are an incel. You cant post a single photo or video of you having a sexual encounter with a women due to the fact that you are a virgin incel. Glad to have educated you, dont forget your place. Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. I win :)

>>218280003
How was my ego checked? I gave you the opportunity to defend yourself, and you refused to take it. You then conceded the argument and admitted that I was right.

>You claimed 4chans filled with incels. Therefor you are an incel.
We've been over this several times and you've yet to provide any counter-argument. You can't demonstrate that my usage of "full" was wrong. Your own logic also dictates that you yourself are an incel.

>You cant post a single photo or video of you having a sexual encounter with a women due to the fact that you are a virgin incel.
1) This is a completely unreasonable standard of evidence.
2) The burden of proof is on you, not me.
3) Even if I did provide evidence of me having sex, it wouldn't actually prove that I'm not an incel because that's not what the word means.

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218280011
I win :)

>>218280017
You're so incapable of proving this that you won't even try.

File: 169.png (109 KB, 432x221)

109 KB PNG

>>218280003
>>218280011
>redditors arguing
4chan is right wing, right wingers have sex, leftwingers don't, that's why they have to kidnap children in schools.
It's not a rocket science.

>>218280028
No, you admitted I was correct with your war of attrition after me embarrassing you.
The meaning of the word full is %100, therefor you are an incel for using 4chan.
And no, its not unreasonable. It just doesn't exist in your case. Therefor I win :)
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218276931
>They CLAIMED they would, it became one of those media buzz things.
What about the Online Safety Act that is demanding every person's ID to use the internet because "think of the children"?

>>218280052
I'm not a redditor.

>>218280062
I didn't admit any such thing. You are the one who admitted that you lost. At no point have you come even close to embarassing me.

>The meaning of the word full is %100, therefor you are an incel for using 4chan.
False, and by this definition you're also an incel and thus it would be pointless for you to accuse me of being one.

>And no, its not unreasonable. It just doesn't exist in your case.
It's unreasonable because this is an anonymous site (you seem to be new here), and because it's not reasonable to expect someone to have recorded themselves having sex. It's also unnecessary since the burden of proof is on you.

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

Also, it's funny you accused me of trying to have the last word because as soon as I stopped replying you immediately panicked and restarted the argument even after admitting you lost.

>>218280092
of course you are a redditor. Imagine the amount of autism it takes to get called out for a broad statement that applies to also you and then debate non stop for hours on end in denial of that fact.
You did, you admitted to loosing. And other anons have embarrassed you.
No, its not pointless seeing as you are highly defensive about the fact you are an incel.
No, its not unreasonable to have a photo or video of a sexual encounter... you would know that if you werent an incel ( all the proof we need )
Crazy how many times youve lost and projected. Also, nice reddit spacing.. you new here? I win :)
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

>>218274747
DESU lots of kids have always been socialized fuckwads even before mass phone usage.

>uk govt tries to ban incest porn
>same govt pushed hard for people to watch this misleading politically correct slop show
They just have terrible taste

>>218280140
I'm not a redditor. You are projecting. You already admitted to being a gay non-white tranny and you're unfamiliar with 4chan culture.

>Imagine the amount of autism it takes to get called out for a broad statement that applies to also you and then debate non stop for hours on end in denial of that fact.
It didn't apply to me, as already explained. And if it did apply to me then it also applies to you.

>You did, you admitted to loosing. And other anons have embarrassed you.
I never admitted any such thing, but you did. No anon has been able to do anything to me.

>No, its not pointless seeing as you are highly defensive about the fact you are an incel.
It's pointless when you are an incel yourself.

>No, its not unreasonable to have a photo or video of a sexual encounter... you would know that if you werent an incel ( all the proof we need )
Perhaps it's reasonable to a gay non-white redditor tranny like you. I was speaking on the behalf of myself and most other people.

>Crazy how many times youve lost and projected.
This is itself projection.

>Also, nice reddit spacing.. you new here? I win :)
It's not reddit spacing, it's just normal spacing. People have been doing it since before the web existed. Interesting though that you would associate it with reddit...

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218276022
>People have been pointing out this shit for years and somehow it’s failed to penetrate Baizuo skulls
No one's fooled by it, it's just that the people it appeals to outnumber the people it's slandering. Browns love anything that shits on white people and women love anything that shits on men.

>>218280181
You are a redditor, hence the reddit spacing.
You did admit to loosing
So you admit you are an incel yourself
So you are a gay non-white redditor tranny, very telling. Makes sense why you are an incel in that case. Also most other people have had sex, you havent incel.
Projecting again
Yes its reddit spacing.
have sex
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun.

holy shit these chud threads are always cringe, but this one takes the cake.

>>218280218
There's no evidence of me being a redditor, but there is evidence of you being one.

>You did admit to loosing
You admitted to losing here: >>218279929
But where did I admit to it? You can't point to any such post.

>So you admit you are an incel yourself
I admitted no such thing anywhere. You however have insisted on logic that would make you an incel.

>So you are a gay non-white redditor tranny, very telling. Makes sense why you are an incel in that case. Also most other people have had sex, you havent incel.
You are the gay non-white redditor tranny. These are all things you've admitted to.

>Projecting again
No, only you are projecting.

>Yes its reddit spacing.
Again, it predates the web let alone reddit. You think it's reddit spacing because of how much time you spend there.

>have sex
No.

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218280244
Your trooncord raid didnt pan out the way you thought it would, did it incel?

>>218280266
There is evidence of you being a redditor
You admitted to losing here >>218275882
You admitted to being an incel.
You are the gay non-white redditor tranny.
Still projecting
its reddit spacing
Of course you say no to sex, it scares you. poor incel.
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. I win :)

>>218280244
(You)

>>218274192
cool

>>218274192
Rekt

>>218274192
crazy

>>218280307
>There is evidence of you being a redditor
No, but there is evidence of you being one. You're also the one who brought it up first.

>You admitted to losing here >>218275882
How?

>You admitted to being an incel.
Where?

>You are the gay non-white redditor tranny.
No, you are. This has been demonstrated already.

>Still projecting
No, you are.

>its reddit spacing
It's reddit spacing to you because of how much time you spend there.

>Of course you say no to sex, it scares you. poor incel.
I never said anything about it scaring me. Are you saying this because you actually got raped by your dad's husband? That would explain why you're a gay tranny.


There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218274192
bongland

>>218280345
No, there is evidence of you being a redditor and you brought up reddit first
You admitted to losing here >>218275882
You admitted to being an incel
No you are. You projected it
No, you are projecting
its reddit spacing, and you are projecting being on reddit
So you got raped by your dads husband and thats why you are a gay tranny. Makes sense why you are an incel now and are afraid of having sex
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. I win :)

>>218274192
england

>>218274192
chud

>>218280345
>reddit spacing
>blabla I'm not an incel
Incel and reddit

>>218274192
Rejection
>No thank you. I'm sorry but I don't feel that way about you
Reality
>OMG. Hey everyone guess who just tried asking me out? Eww you're a manlet and an incel. Didn't you once like a tweet by Tommy Robinson? Haha go back to your basement you fascist little virgin. As if I'd ever let you near me.

>>218280390
There's no evidence of me being a redditor. There is evidence of you being a redditor. You are the one who brought it up first: >>218277478

>You admitted to losing here >>218275882
Again, how?

>You admitted to being an incel
Again, where?

>No you are. You projected it
You admitted to being those things and can't provide any evidence of me doing the same.

>No, you are projecting
No, you are.

>its reddit spacing, and you are projecting being on reddit
It's not reddit spacing. You only think it is because you are a redditor.

>So you got raped by your dads husband and thats why you are a gay tranny.
You're the one who said you had "sex" with your dad's husband.

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218280415
He got big mad when I called him out for being retarded and claiming everyone on 4chan is an incel, and denied being an incel

>>218274192
>portrayed on screen by a white kid
>is actually a 60 iq muslim nigger irl
What did Netflix mean by this?

>>218280415
Projection. You are an incel redditor.

>>218280437
I never said at any point that literally everyone here is an incel. I said 4chan is full of incels in the same way someone might say a town is full of criminals. It's not a literal statement. This has been explained to you many times. I'm denying being an incel due to the simple fact that I am not one.

You're the one who got mad.

Theres no evidence of me being a redditor, there is of you. You brought it up first >>218277331
You admitted to losing here >>218275882 If you cant understand why in the next comment then you conceded and admit ive won
you admitted to being an incel
You admitted to being those things and deflected when called out
No, you are
its reddit spacing, you do it cus you are a redditor
You admitted to being a brown tranny who has sex with his dads husband
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. I win :)

>>218274192
many such incels and transies

>>218280461
It's british. Only white men can be evil

>>218276721
Pathetic bait.

>>218280520
That isn't my post, and yes plenty of evidence of you being a redditor has been presented already.

>You admitted to losing here >>218275882
You're unable to explain how.

>you admitted to being an incel
No, only you did.

>You admitted to being those things and deflected when called out
No, it was specifically you who admitted to being those things. You can't produce any evidence that I ever admitted to being any of those things.

>No, you are
No, you are.

>its reddit spacing, you do it cus you are a redditor
It predates reddit. It's just normal spacing. You associate it with reddit due to amount of time you spend there.

>You admitted to being a brown tranny who has sex with his dads husband
That was you.

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218280474
If you cant post the literal definition of the word full you concede and admit to being a virgin incel whos mad.

>>218274192
Why is it always wihe kids/people, and can we do something to stop it and protect minorities?

>>218280520
Digging through the post history is extremely r*ddit

>>218274280
>normal in middle school
>still normal
what a redundant thing to say

>>218274192
A very reasonable action for a prepubescent boy.

>>218274306
end up like what? The series is about a kid who gets bullied and lashes out.

>>218280543
You admitted to losing
you just admited to being an incel here >>218280520
You admited to being those things, You can't produce any evidence that I ever admitted to being any of those things.
no, you are.
its reddit spacing
no, that was you here >>218280520

Alright then. You concede the argument and you admit that I was right about everything. Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. I win :)

>>218274280
You know being a red/blackpilled FA loser and hating blacks are not mutually exclusive, right? Even antisemitism is normalised among normal people nowadays because of Gaza. The whole manosphere thing is just as bad as third wave feminism, because. You can tell (((someone))) is pushing both and it’s working so the next generation will reproduce less.

>>218280546
Since you're still refusing to consult a dictionary I guess I'll take pity on you and do it for you:
> possessing or containing a great number or amount
>a room full of pictures
>full of hope
>his claims are full of lies

>>218280598
>You admitted to losing
Where?

>you just admited to being an incel here >>218280520
That's your post, not mine. Oops?

>You admited to being those things, You can't produce any evidence that I ever admitted to being any of those things.
I never admitted to any such things, whereas you did.

>no, you are.
No, you are.

>its reddit spacing
To you. Because you're a redditor.

>no, that was you here >>218280520
That's also your post, not mine.

>Alright then. You concede the argument and you admit that I was right about everything.
You're just copying me without any understanding of the context. Very third world-coded.

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218280554
Being an incel in extremely reddit

>>218280651
Why are you panicking, you admitted you lost to me here >>218280520
wrong, heres the meaning : "Full" refers to being completely filled to capacity, holding the maximum amount possible, or containing all necessary parts/details
You admitted to losing here >>218280520
you admitted to being an incel here >>218275593
You admited to being those things, You can't produce any evidence that I ever admitted to being any of those things.
I never admitted to any such things, whereas you did.
no you are
its reddit spacing because you are a redditor
No that was you here >>218279919
Your just copying me without understanding the context. Very incel coded.
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. I win :)

>>218274192
wow that incel got btfo

>>218275593
>>218275683
reading this now i know why hes been seething for so long anon, you shouldnt waste your energy on retards

>>218274192
haha wow

File: 4chan reddit spacing in 2004.png (104 KB, 1010x1272)

104 KB PNG

>>218280723
>Why are you panicking, you admitted you lost to me here >>218280520
That's your post.

>wrong, heres the meaning
There are multiple meanings, which is normal for English words. Tell me again how you're supposed to be white.

>You admitted to losing here >>218280520
That's your post.

>you admitted to being an incel here >>218275593
How?

>You admited to being those things
No, but you did.

>You can't produce any evidence that I ever admitted to being any of those things.
I already have.

>I never admitted to any such things, whereas you did.
You did admit to those things, unlike me.

>no you are
No, you are.

>its reddit spacing because you are a redditor
You think it's reddit spacing because you are a redditor.

>No that was you here
No, that was in fact >>218280520 because that's the post you linked to.

>Your just copying me without understanding the context. Very incel coded.
You are the one who copied me, and now you're doing it again with zero understanding of what I'm saying.

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218274192
wasted

>>218280782
this is your post >>218279919
then why did you subvert posting : refers to being completely filled to capacity, holding the maximum amount possible. Silly incel
thats your post >>218279919
you admitted to being an incel here >>218275593
no, but you did
I already have
You did admit to those things, unlike me.
No, you are.
you dont think its reddit spacing due to trying to hide being a redditor
No, that was in fact >>218279919 because that's the post you linked to.
You are the one who copied me, and now you're doing it again with zero understanding of what I'm saying. very incel coded.
to top it off you post some gook. Of course you are an incel and a weeb.
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. I win :)

>>218274192
wild

>>218274192
crazy

>>218277503
gottem

>>218274192
what was the point of this thread, anon?

>>218280840
>this is your post >>218279919
Yes, that one is mine. And?

>then why did you subvert posting : refers to being completely filled to capacity, holding the maximum amount possible. Silly incel
Because, silly thirdworlder, words have multiple meanings. You seem genuinely intellectually incapable of grasping this.

>thats your post >>218279919
Yes, that is my post. What about it?

>you admitted to being an incel here >>218275593
How?

>no, but you did
No, you did.

>I already have
Have what?

>You did admit to those things, unlike me.
Ok then, show me where I admitted to those things and also refute all previous arguments where I've shown how you admitted to those things.

>No, you are.
No, you are.

>you dont think its reddit spacing due to trying to hide being a redditor
You think it's reddit spacing because you're a redditor. People were using paragraph breaks long before reddit was invented.

>No, that was in fact >>218279919 because that's the post you linked to.
Again you are just copying my text with no comprehension of context and meaning. Truly third world behavior.

>You are the one who copied me, and now you're doing it again with zero understanding of what I'm saying.
You are literally copy-pasting my text back at me and then claiming it's somehow your text.

>to top it off you post some gook. Of course you are an incel and a weeb.
It's a screenshot from 4chan. You know, the same site you're on right now?

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218280897
yup this ones mine, and? >>218280520 You conceded
Then why cover up those 2 main definitions silly thirdworlder, its almost as if you are trying to doctor information to appear correct. and lazily at that. typical shit skin.
yup this ones mine, and? >>218280520 You conceded
no, you did.
Won
>>218280520
no, you are.
you dont think its reddit spacing due to trying to hide being a redditor
if you purposufly argue in bad faith with no comprehension of context and meaning then you truly are an incel.
You are literally copy-pasting my text back at me and then claiming it's somehow your text.
a twenty two year old photo you understand this isnt the same place anymore, nor was reddit even a thing. retard.
You accepted my concession here >>218280520
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. I win :)

>>218274192
baka

>>218274192
noice

>>218274192
wow haha real

>>218274192
let the thread die

>>218274192
shit man thats crazy

>>218280969
>yup this ones mine, and? >>218280520
I know it's your post. Why are you telling me this?

>You conceded
Where?

>Then why cover up those 2 main definitions silly thirdworlder, its almost as if you are trying to doctor information to appear correct. and lazily at that. typical shit skin.
I didn't cover up anything, shitskin. I cited the definition I was using for the word. You're probably Indian because you think in the caste logic that the definition at the top must be the best one that supercedes all the other ones.

>yup this ones mine, and?
Again, why are you telling me this?

>You conceded
How?

>no, you did.
No, you did.

>Won
You haven't been able to do anything to prove this. You even admitted earlier that you completely lost the argument.

>no, you are.
No, you are.

>you dont think its reddit spacing due to trying to hide being a redditor
You think it's reddit spacing because you're a redditor.

>if you purposufly argue in bad faith with no comprehension of context and meaning then you truly are an incel.
You're the one copy-pasting my own text back at me and acting like it's your text. That's bad faith. You're also once again showing you don't even understand what incel means.

>You are literally copy-pasting my text back at me and then claiming it's somehow your text.
No, that's what you did.

>a twenty two year old photo you understand this isnt the same place anymore, nor was reddit even a thing. retard.
That's exactly the point my dear intellectually impaired Indian. "reddit spacing" predates the existence of reddit.

>You accepted my concession here >>218280520
That's your post, not mine.

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218274747
>take everyone's rights away because some people can't raise their kids
We just need to start seriously socially shaming parents who let their kids be iPad babies. That should be like raising your child solely on McDonalds and cola and liberally smoking around them. Everyone knows that's bad and shameful at this point.
If the media simply aired some honest programming that explained how Roblox is specifically engineered to be addictive, predispose your child toward gambling, and is filled with paedophiles, people would get the message.

>you are le incel!
How about this. I'm one. So what?
I'm not the one out there being violent, or encouraging violence. I have a disability, and have never been very appealing to women. I haven't *done* anything.

It's the deep-state sponsored religious extremists and the far left wackos who are out there explicitly calling for mass violence.

>>218278252
Honestly, if we're going to live with black people, we should be putting them through anti-racism courses, because they're bigger racists than white people are.

>>218281037
cus you conceded there. >>218280520
yes you did, hence the reason you hid 2 of the definitions, but like a tranny you try to pick and choose.
> You're probably Indian
projection
why are you telling me this incel?
here >>218280520
no, you did
>>218280520, and you admitted earlier that you completely lost the argument
no, you are
No, whats bad faith is acting like you misunderstand the definition of irony when you state a place you are in is full of incel. And claim victory when you don't get a catered response very incel like behavior
No, that's what you did, early in the chat saying im the incel when I called you it first. silly incel
Yet its called out for very good reason on this sit, feel free to point out on that photo any block of text with that much reddit spacing
That's your post, not mine. >>218279919

Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. I win :)

>>218281037
Whats crazy is youve taken this amount of time out of your life on a silly post you made, and went on a temper tantrum like a child over being called out for irony... ive got a pretty clear idea in my mind what you look like and how much your life sucks. Your dad and mum probably hate you, and wonder if you are a faggot due to never having a gf. To think YOU needed to bitch out like a women ( despite never having one ) and make a fool of yourself is truly laughable. Hope things get better for you turd worlder, but youll just end up seething about never getting pussy for your entire life. and making excuses like ( how can you expect me to have a photo or video of a sexual partner ) Either a virgin, child or incel. All cases are pathetic, but you already know what you are.

Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. I win :)

>>218274192
smoked

>>218274192
rejected

>>218281165
>cus you conceded there. >>218280520
That's your post, not mine. Why do you have such a hard time figuring out which are your posts and which are mine?

>yes you did, hence the reason you hid 2 of the definitions, but like a tranny you try to pick and choose.
Words have multiple definitions, tranny. The first definition at the top of the page is not the singular, definitive definition of the word. If that's how it worked then all other definitions would be deleted.

>projection
No. I provided reasoning for why you're probably Indian, and I have not said anything that would indicate that I am Indian.

>why are you telling me this incel?
I was asking you a question, incel. I was not telling you anything.

>here >>218280520
Here what?

>no, you did
No, you did.

>>>218280520, and you admitted earlier that you completely lost the argument
That was you. You're the one who admitted that. Are you senile as well?

>no, you are
No, you are.

>No, whats bad faith is acting like you misunderstand the definition of irony when you state a place you are in is full of incel. And claim victory when you don't get a catered response very incel like behavior
I never acted like I misunderstood the definition of irony. I've proven with a dictionary that I used "full" correctly, and you have not been able to argue why my statement would have necessarily included me in and literally everyone on the site.

I claimed victory after you refused to defend yourself and agreed to concede the argument.

>No, that's what you did, early in the chat saying im the incel when I called you it first. silly incel
You're an incel because you got weirdly defensive when I said 4chan is full of incels, like you felt that you were being targeted by the statement. Silly incel.

>>218281165
>Yet its called out for very good reason on this sit, feel free to point out on that photo any block of text with that much reddit spacing
reddit spacing is just paragraph breaks that people were doing years and decades before redditors like you started claiming it for yourselves.

>That's your post, not mine.
No, >>218280520 is indeed your post. Not mine.

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218278132
>settle down class, today we're learning about trans-
>GROANS* omg not more fag shit

>>218281190
I haven't had any temper tantrum and you didn't "call me out." There was no irony. You're the one who's been keeping this thread going. The rest of your post is projection and pointlessly rehashing stuf that's already been conclusively answered in the thread.

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.

>>218278132
Just saying, the teachers know they can lose their jobs for not going along with this. They'll be as pissed off as anyone.

>>218281230
This is your post, not mine >>218279919. Same logic weeb incel.
yes you did incel, hence the reason you hid 2 of the definitions, but like a tranny you try to pick and choose.
as ive provided reasoning for why youre most definitely a weeb incel
you conceded there, read retard, same logic as yours, dumb fuckin jeet.
no, you did.
Oh so by that logic you admitted the same thing here >>218280520
no, you are
You have and you did. Irony : a literary and rhetorical device defined by a contradiction. Il give you time to think, but you will misconstrue and claim to be outside of your generalized comment. weeb incel.

And I claim victory when you failed to understand the irony of the situation and concede the argument.
No, calling you out for an ironic statement is not being defensive weeb incel. Nice try though.
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. I win :)

You can just refer to this comment from now on. Ive won >>218281190

>>218281236
" you started claiming it for yourselves " you have to go back. yes that post has you conceding.
Yes, youve had a temper tantrum for almost 10 straight hours. You are an incel, you got called out for an ironic ( just in case you forgot. Irony :a literary and rhetorical device defined by a contradiction ) generalized statement. No, im not the one whos kept it going. Both of us have you dumb fucking sexlexx incel nigger child. No, youve projected hard.
Your concession is accepted, incel weeb-kun. I win :)

>>218281302
Yes, that post is mine. What about it?

>Same logic weeb incel.
What logic, weeb incel? What "logic" are you seeing here? I'm just pointing out which posts are yours.

>yes you did incel, hence the reason you hid 2 of the definitions, but like a tranny you try to pick and choose.
I didn't hide anything. I cited the definition that corresponds to my usage of the word. The first definition in the dictionary is not the only definition. If it were the only definition then the other ones wouldn't exist. Like an Indian tranny you are unable to understand simple things like this.

>as ive provided reasoning for why youre most definitely a weeb incel
All refuted.

>you conceded there, read retard, same logic as yours, dumb fuckin jeet.
I didn't concede anywhere, jeet.

>no, you did.
No, you did.

>Oh so by that logic you admitted the same thing here >>218280520
That is YOUR post, not mine. How are you so bad at this?

>no, you are
No, you are.

>You have and you did. Irony : a literary and rhetorical device defined by a contradiction. Il give you time to think, but you will misconstrue and claim to be outside of your generalized comment. weeb incel.
The real irony here is you acting like you're the authority on definitions when you don't know the definitions of words and can't work out how to read a dictionary. Weeb incel.

>And I claim victory when you failed to understand the irony of the situation and concede the argument.
There was no irony, other than your own behavior. You conceded the argument when you refused to defend yourself.

There was no concession. You have no proof for any of your accusations against me.