>The clear good-vs-evil approach leaves little room for moral complexityAnd it's enough because it's just like the real world. There is no moral ambiguity, it's good guys (white people) versus evil guys (jews and shitskins), as simple as that
>>218421564OP's article is bot clickbait but you're an actual retard, there is a fuckton of moral ambiguity and characters whose intentions are unknown
>>218421531So modern audiences a short attention spanned retards who want all dialogue to be sassy marvel quips.
Ban all slop spamnot even talking about ai, just slop in generalban it
>>218421564If it’s that simple, why are most white nations queuing up to defend Israel?
>>218421757Because modern Israelis aren't true Semites but Ashkenazi, which have Eastern European origins.
>>218421757because instead of 1 grima wormtongue there are 20 million that spend billions on elections and run s*x tr*fficking rings to bl*ckm*il people.
>>218421757only the leaders (which are jews) are, average citizen is anti israel
>>218421668Modern movies are designed as second screen watching Matt Damon has talked about it they have to repeat the plot lines out loud several times so people on their phones know what's going on.
>>218421870‘Smart’phones really have ruined society as a whole.
>>218421564How can I know which I am?
>>218421531>the old style dialogue can feel hard to connectThis was written for shitskins and Disney adults.
>>218421870If your film can't compete with an 8 second TikTok of a cat fixing a motorcycle then that's a skill issue
>>218421613No, you're retarded. There is no moral ambiguity with Sauron or the orcs and there doesn't need to be. Millenials and Zoomers obsession with everything being shades of gray so women don't feel bad about flicking their beans to the "bad guys" is ruining movies.
If moral ambiguity is a good thing then why is The Bible so popular?
>>218422299It’s not the same group complaining.
>>218421564>good vs evil is enough
>>218421531on the first point, I often break the movie into parts myself due to migraines, and nothing is lost. Absolutely nothing. I often watch things during multiple days. It's not a negative unless it's a skill issue..
4 is an absurd critique of a movie. If we were talking about traversal mechanics in a video game, that would be one thing, but this "person" is really complaining about a few walking montages in a 12 hour trilogy.
>>218422262Aren’t Zoomer tradcath larpers the ones who usually think moral ambiguity is le bad.
>>218421531There's nothing fucking overly formal about the dialogue in those movie, bombastic sure but formal?
>>218421531this is just one of those clickbait articles that cbr or screenrant put out to pay the monthly bills, its like when they made that lotr is racist articles
>>218421975check your skin color, denounce the talmud
>>218421531>chatgpt text
>>218421531For God's sake, kill all zoomers.
>>218421531Not a single complaint if validAlmost all of them are "I can't fathom something that doesn't sound exactly like me" and "I don't have any attention span"The most offensive being no moral complexity Not everything needs that. Fuck you. It's refreshing that it isn't shades of grey
>>218421531so evil pedo goblins have vague generic criticism of lotr. I'm shocked....
>>218421531>3, today's audiences are unable to identify with honor, righteousness, duty, loyalty, comradery, or the beauty of the natural worldthats what happens when they have a crippling addiction to shortform content on their phones and no real social structure.
>>218421531>#8there is no such thing as a spoiler. knowing some simple information and having an experience are two separate things unrelated to each other. if your brain cant differentiate that, then you have a flawed, subhuman brain. if you think that knowing something "ruins" it, then you're retarded. also if knowing something "ruins" it, then it was never good in the first place, because any replay of it would be "ruined". anyone who complains about spoilers is a drooling retard with inferior mental faculties.
>>218422262>cherrypicks only two typesAnd even then in the books the orcs do have moments of ambiguity
>>218421564When the other guy is a giant flaming eyeball I dont think you need moral ambiguity
>>218421564I am tired of modern storytelling of misunderstanding villains and gray morals.
>>218421681The board would cease to exist
>>218422299You don't think there's ambiguity in the bible? There's many characters whose actions I'd definitely describe as evil, and yet they're favored by God, so they're meant to be good.
>>218421564
>>218421564>>218424979/tv/ loved the Joker.
>>218426855Name one.
>>218427116Well, for example Jacob was a total asshole. His elder brother once came to him starving, begging him to share some food with him, and Jacob only gave him some soup in exchange for his birthright. Seems pretty evil to exploit a moment of weakness in your own brother for you own gain like that. And later when their father Izaak was dying and wanted to give his blessing to Esau, Jacob and his mother tricked him, they sent Esau out to hunt, while Jacob disguised himself as his older brother in order to fool the father into giving him the blessing.Or another one would be his son - Joseph. He was sold into Egyptian slavery by his own siblings - a whole other carfuffle. But anyway, he later got God to help him interpret people's dreams. After interpreting the Pharaoh's dream, he saw 7 years of bountiful harvest followed by 7 years of draught and starvation. So the Pharaoh took his advice and made him responsible for preparing for the famine. So for 7 years Joseph gathered the food from Egyptian farmers, and when the famine came what did he do? Well he certainly didn't redistribute it back to the people. Instead he sold it back to them for high prices, and the famished farmers had to sell him his land not to die of starvation, so they all ended up losing their farms and going directly into Pharaoh's slavery. Cuntish move if you ask me.His siblings were even worse. A king (ruler of a city) fell in love with one of them, Joseph's sister if I recall correctly. The brothers eventually agreed to give the king her hand, but ONLY if everyone in the city got circumcized. The king agreed, and got everyone circumcized. When all the men were recoving from the painful procedure, the siblings raided the city and killed all of them. Nice thinking there!
>>218421564This is the kind of review we need more of
>>218427907Or another one - Abraham himself. His wife caught the Pharaoh's eye. So Abraham told her to go along with him, and to tell him that she was just Abraham's sister. After Pharaoh courted her, Abraham came to him accusing him of taking a married woman and demanding compensation. So Pharaoh paid him. They repeated the same exact trick on someone else later, if I remember correctly.So anyway, many people in the Bible lied, cheated, murdered and did all sorts of vile things, and yet they always succeeded because they had the favor of God. They were the chosen people, revered prophets and otherwise important people.btw these are all examples from exodus, because I couldn't stand to read further.
>>218421531Where's the top right image fromFor some reason I don't remember it from the movies
I put this article in an AI checker. It was 90% generated.
>>218421531>clear good-vs-evil approach leaves little room for moral complexityI think the internal Gollum vs Smeagol subplot covered that.
>>218421531Wow this is some dumbass pedantic zoomer nitpicking
>>218427038That was morally ambiguous to you?
