Did uncs really believe this?
>>218605549Indulge us OP, what are the bare minimum essentials of a non-loser?
>>218605614A bonesmashed face.
>>218605549With how many lonely people there are days let’s with yes
>>218605549even people at the time didn't believe thisthere's a reason the movie flopped and fell into obscurity and didn't become popular until it went into the public domain and channels started airing it during dead time at Christmas
>only underlined words are “no” and “friends”what did Clarence mean by this
>>218605549No man is a failure who has friends and who gets pussy
If the idea you're trying to convey is that having friends keeps a man from being a failure, then the statement should have been worded as "no man who has friends is a failure". The way it was worded instead sounds like you're describing the concept of "a failure who has friends" and stating that no man is that. Which isn't senseless but it's a bit odd.
>>218605549why is>no>friendsunderlined?
>>218609174>>218606228they were not his friends
>>218609205Get them on board, I'll call it in
>>218607057do you think OP wrote that or is this just AI?
>>218605549What does that say? Google Lens isn't translating it.
>>218606228>>218609174imagine being this dumb
>>218609205That’s fine, they don’t get to come along anyway
>>218611412>Dear Georges:->Remember no man>is a failure who has>friends.>Thanks for the wings!>Love>Clarence
>>218611412Beat HeatgesRemembers no man iu a tailune vyho havtriende.hanks fon the urinqhoodIianenw
>>218605549explain to the folks at home what an "unc" is, zoomer-kun
>>218612093George took Clarence to Bdubs??
